Process Evaluation

Rationale, development and feasibility of group antenatal care for immigrant women in Sweden: a study protocol for the Hooyo Project
Ulrika Byrskog, Malin Ahrne, Rhonda Small, Ewa Andersson, Birgitta Essen, Aisha Adan, Fardosa Hassen Ahmed, Karin Tesser, Yvonne Lidén, Monika Israelsson, Anna Åhman-Berndtsson, Erica Schytt

BMJ Open Jul 2019, 9 (7) e030314; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030314
Does ‘Time Together’ increase quality of interaction and decrease stress? A study protocol of a multisite nursing intervention in psychiatric inpatient care, using a mixed method approach
Jenny Molin, Britt-Marie Lindgren, Ulla Hällgren Graneheim, Anders Ringnér

BMJ Open Aug 2017, 7 (8) e015677; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015677
Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study
Sheila Turner, Abby Bull, Fay Chinnery, Jeremy Hinks, Nicola Mcardle, Rebecca Moran, Helen Payne, Eleanor Woodford Guegan, Louise Worswick, Jeremy C Wyatt

BMJ Open Dec 2018, 8 (12) e022548; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022548
Implementing an allied health team intervention to improve the care of older adults in the emergency department: protocol for a process evaluation
Marica Cassarino, Úna Cronin, Katie Robinson, Rosie Quinn, Fiona Boland, Marie E Ward, Rosa MacNamara, Margaret O’Connor, Gerard McCarthy, Damien Ryan, Rose Galvin

BMJ Open Jul 2019, 9 (7) e032645; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032645
The Health and Sport Engagement (HASE) Intervention and Evaluation Project: protocol for the design, outcome, process and economic evaluation of a complex community sport intervention to increase levels of physical activity
Louise Mansfield, Nana Anokye, Julia Fox-Rushby, Tess Kay

BMJ Open Oct 2015, 5 (10) e009276; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009276
Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
Mary Dixon-Woods, Chris Foy, Charlotte Hayden, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Stephen Tebbutt, Sara Schroter

BMJ Open Aug 2016, 6 (8) e011973; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011973
INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
Abdul Salam, Frances Stewart, Kavita Singh, Simon Thom, Hilarie Jane Williams, Anushka Patel, Stephen Jan, Tracey Laba, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Pallab Maulik, Sophie Day, Helen Ward

BMJ Open Jan 2013, 3 (5) e002313; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002313
Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve management of multimorbidity in general practice: the 3D study
Cindy Mann, Alison Shaw, Bruce Guthrie, Lesley Wye, Mei-See Man, Sandra Hollinghurst, Sara Brookes, Peter Bower, Stewart Mercer, Chris Salisbury

BMJ Open May 2016, 6 (5) e011260; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011260
Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
Mark J Edwards, Thomas May, Joanna M Kesten, Kate Banfield, Emma L Bird, Jane E Powell, Simon J Sebire, Russell Jago

BMJ Open Jan 2016, 6 (1) e010036; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010036
Process evaluation of the Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care (DQIP) trial: case study evaluation of adoption and maintenance of a complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribing
Aileen Grant, Tobias Dreischulte, Bruce Guthrie

BMJ Open Mar 2017, 7 (3) e015281; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015281

Main menu

Process Evaluation

Pages

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Process Evaluation

Pages