Responses

Download PDFPDF

Understanding patient preference for physician attire: a cross-sectional observational study of 10 academic medical centres in the USA
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    The state of affairs in United Kingdom

    After reading the study thoroughly it comes as a surprise that patients would be actually assessing about there treating physicians and surgeon's knowledge and competence also on basis of there attire rather than handling of affairs, discussions and discourse. The high percentage of preference for White Coats was also indeed refreshing to see in US. Even though in United Kingdom, NHS has embraced the concept of bare elbow for many years now and almost completely let go of the white coat culture, which once used to be a sense of identification and source of pride for doctors everywhere. I believe if such a study is carried out across trusts in United Kingdom the results would be convincingly different. Especially because use of Caucasian models would result in significant bias for the study since NHS is multicultural and not just consisting of Caucasian doctors.. It would be interesting if the same study model is repeated with doctors representing the BAME(Black Asian Minority Ethnicity) as patients preferences regarding there attire would be a stark difference from Caucasian fellow doctors. Also effect of attire would have much greater influence on patients perceiving there doctor as being knowledgeable or not.

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Advice that has stood the Test of Time

    In their manuscript, Petrilli et al. reference an abundance of literature showing that bacteria and other pathogens can be isolated from physician attire, including items that are typically not laundered after a single use, such as white coats and neckties. Despite this, they claim an absence of literature linking said contamination to source or transmission of disease. I caution the authors not to dismiss lower levels of evidence for clinical studies, such as case series. In his essay, which was later published in The New England Quarterly Journal of Medicine and Surgery, Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. describes what can be interpreted as a clinical demonstration of early germ theory related to the contagiousness of postpartum infections and subsequent maternal death.(1) Holmes references multiple cases where physicians performing obstetrical duties in clothes worn in the care of (or performance of autopsy on) patients who succumbed to puerperal fever, would have similar outcomes on future patients with whom they came in contact. He references a similar case report published by Brodie in the Lancet where a provider, after destroying his entire wardrobe, had no recurrent cases of puerperal peritonitis.(2) He finishes with a list of recommendations, which instructs physicians to change “every article of dress” after post-mortem contact with patients who died of puerperal fever. In the absence of convincing evidence refuting the now common sense nature of Holmes’ recommendat...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    President & Medical Director - Golden State MD Health & Wellness A Professional Corporation
    • Ahimsa P Sumchai MD, Sports Medicine/Emergency Medicine/Fitness & Nutrition Golden State MD Health & Wellness

    As an African American female physician and practice owner with a 37 year professional history I fully concur with the findings of this article. I have commented on other writings on Doximity around the issues of professional attire and efforts to restrict wearing white coats. As a practice owner with locations in San Francisco and Sacramento I travel weekly by Amtrak and this experiences reinforces my opinion that professional attire for a physician can improve patient and public interactions. In the course of my career I have experienced numerous incidents in which I was demeaned, harassed or disrespected as a physician because of my race and gender in areas dominated traditionally by white males. I have authored numerous writings about my experience as the first African American female to train in neurological surgery in the University of California system and my experiences as a flight physician and post doctoral fellow for Stanford Life Flight. I have been mistaken for a custodian, a "girl" and on a good day a pediatrician in my years of training. My white coat and my professional attire make all the difference in the world in how patients relate to me. When I appear without it I am called Miss or Ms. When I have it on I am called Doctor.I will never give up wearing my white coat!

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.