Responses

Download PDFPDF

Trends in the socioeconomic patterning of overweight/obesity in India: a repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative data
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Trends in the socioeconomic patterning of overweight/obesity in India: a repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative data
    • Sintha Dewi Purnamasari, Nutritionist/ Master Student Taipei Medical University
    • Other Contributors:
      • Usman Iqbal, Lecturer

    1. From this study, the Authors had the aim to examine trends in prevalence of overweight/obesity among adults in India by socioeconomic position (SEP) between 1998 and 2016 but the data that they collected the range was not the same for example they collected the data 1998/1999, 6 years later 2005/2006, then 9 years later 2015/2016. The data from women they collected start from 1998 and for men start from 2005. From this data, maybe many of researchers will ask about this, it is not clear to describe about the prevalence, around 6 or 9 years it had uniqe graphic that we cannot see from this research.

    2. BMI is commonly used by the researcher to classify overweight and obesity in adults. Whereas, BMI is not good enough to describe about nutritional status because BMI does not measure about fat, based on World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Consultation in 2002 to review and assess the issues related to whether population-specific BMI cut-off points are needed in Asian populations. Overweight and obesity are not the same, they have different cut-off. As the Authors mentioned for the overweight the cut-off ≥24,99 kg/m2. Maybe we can distinguish between overweight (≥24,99 kg/m2) and obesity (≥30,00 kg/m2) to see the different of prevalence both of them like the research that Sánchez-Cruz (2018) and Muttarak, Raya (2018) were undertaken from their research. So, Policy makers can know how many adults got overweight and obesity, and this result to be more informative a...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.