You are here

Article Text

Article menu
XML
Complementary medicine
Protocol
Acupuncture for postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review protocol
  1. Jae-Young Jung,
  2. Jae-Heung Cho,
  3. Seok-hee Chung
  1. Department of Korean Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  1. Correspondence to Professor Seok-hee Chung; omdchung{at}khu.ac.kr

Abstract

Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical method in orthopaedics; however, pain management after TKA remains a significant challenge. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of acupuncture for postoperative pain after TKA.

Methods and analysis The following 10 databases will be searched until August 2015: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, AMED, CINAHL, three Chinese databases (the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, and Wanfang Database) and five Korean databases (the Korean Medical Database, the Korean Studies Information Service System, the National Discovery for Science Leaders, the Database Periodical Information Academic, and the Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System). All eligible randomised controlled trials related to the use of acupuncture for postoperative pain after TKA will be included. Assessment of risk of bias will be performed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias method. Mean differences or standardised mean differences will be calculated with 95% CIs for continuous data; the risk ratio will be used with 95% CIs for dichotomous data.

Dissemination This systematic review will be presented in a peer-reviewed journal. The result of this review will also be disseminated at a relevant conference presentation.

Trial registration number PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015020924.

  • PAIN MANAGEMENT
  • COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
  • REHABILITATION MEDICINE

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

https://doi-org.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009573

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • Selection of the studies, assessment of risk of bias, data extraction and data pooling will be carried out by two researchers independently to perform an objective and systematic evaluation of acupuncture on postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

    • The results of the systematic review should be useful to practitioners for making better-informed decisions about pain control and rehabilitation after TKA.

    • There may be considerable heterogeneity as a result of the various forms of acupuncture therapies.

    Introduction

    Description of the condition

    Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the most common surgical technique to treat severe knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, is a highly successful procedure to improve knee function and pain.1 ,2 However, pain after TKA remains a major symptom, and rehabilitation, which is commonly performed following the procedure, is closely associated with pain management.3 ,4 Moreover, since opioid analgesics are in wide use for acute postoperative pain regulation, severe adverse effects relating to their use are frequently reported.5 ,6 Therefore, the gold standard for postoperative pain management remains unclear.7

    Description of the intervention

    Acupuncture is a complex and interactive intervention that can be used in the treatment, rehabilitation and/or management of various diseases and conditions (eg, acute and chronic pain disorders, cerebrovascular disease, chemotherapy for cancer, and post-traumatic stress disorder). Acupuncture is the most common treatment for various musculoskeletal pains.8 According to several recent systematic reviews (SRs), acupuncture exerts pain-relieving effects after various types of surgeries.9 ,10 Various studies have reported that the use of acupuncture can relieve postoperative pain and reduce the dosage of opioid analgesics and their related adverse effects in the postsurgical period.11 ,12

    How the intervention may work

    Many studies have reported that acupuncture can be helpful for relieving pain.8 However, the precise mechanism by which acupuncture provides postoperative analgesia remains unclear. Some studies explain the pain-relieving effects of acupuncture in terms of a spinal mechanism (eg, gate control theory), hormonal effects and peripheral events (eg, local circulation, vasodilation and tissue healing).13 ,14 The pain-relieving effects after TKA are thought to occur via the same mechanisms. Recent studies have supported the belief that acupuncture can be a useful option for pain regulation for patients undergoing TKA;15 ,16 however, there have been few studies that demonstrate the mechanism(s).

    Why it is important to perform this review

    TKA is commonly used for the treatment of severe advanced osteoarthritis in aged patients, and its use is continuously increasing.1 ,2 When pain management and rehabilitation are performed in an appropriate manner after the operation, TKA can be considered a highly effective procedure. However, inadequate use of analgesics for postoperative pain impairs recovery from the operation and rehabilitation.7 Moreover, since most patients undergoing TKA are elderly, the use of analgesics, including opioids, requires careful consideration.17 As a result, multimodal approaches for postoperative pain control have been proposed, and the postoperative pain-relieving effects of acupuncture have been reported in a number of studies. In addition, acupuncture, which can be considered a type of therapeutic formula, has been systematised in comparison to other kinds of alternative therapies, such as herbal therapies, which are too heterogeneous to evaluate systematically.18 Furthermore, the safety of acupuncture has been reported by numerous studies, whereas the risks of other alternative therapies remain unclear.19 Thus, postoperative pain control using acupuncture therapies has more potential as a practical approach than other alternative therapies. However, the effects of acupuncture after TKA remain controversial.15 ,16 ,20 Moreover, no systematic review on the use of acupuncture for postoperative pain relief after TKA exists in the literature. Hence, a comprehensive review of the effects of acupuncture on postoperative pain following TKA may contribute to the rehabilitation of patients undergoing TKA surgery.

    Objectives

    This review protocol provides a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of acupuncture on postoperative pain following TKA. The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of postoperative pain after TKA. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of acupuncture on knee movement and quality of life (QOL), and to investigate the safety of acupuncture therapies.

    Methods

    Criteria for including studies in this review

    Types of studies

    Prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture therapy for postoperative pain after TKA will be included. Non­randomised studies (NRS), including case–control trials and case studies, will be excluded. No language restriction will be applied.

    Types of participants

    Patients undergoing TKA will be included. We will not exclude eligible patients based on the reason for TKA.

    Types of interventions

    Acupuncture therapy will be defined as various needling procedures that stimulate acupoints, such as manual acupuncture, auricular acupuncture or electroacupuncture. Non-penetrating stimulation on acupoints, such as acupressure or laser acupuncture, will be excluded. We will include traditional acupuncture, auricular acupuncture and electroacupuncture; therefore, we will be able to comprehensively evaluate the effects of acupuncture on postoperative pain after TKA. We will also include trials that compared acupuncture plus another typical treatment with other typical treatments alone. Control interventions will include sham/placebo acupuncture, no treatment, waiting list membership and conventional therapies (eg, usual care, analgesics, manual therapy).

    Types of outcome measures

    Primary outcomes

    1. Pain: a pain-associated scale will be included (eg, visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale).

    2. Functional evaluation of knee joint: the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC).

    Secondary outcomes

    1. The range of motion of the knee joint.

    2. QOL: a QOL-associated scale will be included (eg, Euro-QoL (EQ5D) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)).

    3. Adverse events related to acupuncture treatment.

    Search methods for identification of studies

    Electronic searches

    According to the core standard ideal (COSI) model,21 the following databases will be searched for the period from the time of their inception to August 2015 to identify relevant articles: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We will also search the following three Chinese medical databases: the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Wanfang Database. In addition, we will search the following five Korean medical databases: the Korean Medical Database (KMBASE), the Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), the National Discovery for Science Leaders (NDSL), the Database Periodical Information Academic (DBPIA), and the Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS).

    Searching other resources

    We will manually investigate ambiguous literature to avoid missing eligible trials. We will search reference lists of all eligible studies. In addition, the clinical trial registers (eg, Clinical trials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, Chinese Clinical Trial Register and Australian and New Zealand Clinical Registry) also will be searched for ongoing or unpublished trials.

    Search strategy

    The search strategies for MEDLINE/PubMed are described in online supplementary appendix 1, and we will modify these search strategies for other databases.

    Data collection and analysis

    Selection of studies

    Two independent review authors will screen the titles and abstracts of all searched studies, and studies will be selected through a full-text review if they meet the predefined eligibility criteria. When a consensus on the selection process cannot be obtained through consultations, the third author will ultimately decide. The selection process of this review will be presented in the PRISMA flow chart (figure 1).22

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    PRISMA flow chart of the trial selection process (NRS, non­randomised studies).

    Data extraction and management

    Data will be extracted from all eligible studies by two independent reviewers. When a consensus on the data extraction cannot be obtained through consultations, the third author will decide. When the collected data are incomplete or unclear, the arbiter will contact the corresponding authors of the original articles to request additional data or an explanation of the relevant issue. We will extract the characteristics of the participants (eg, average age, gender, hospitalisation day, analgesics consumption, and inclusion and exclusion criteria), type of intervention, type of control intervention, sample size of each intervention group, randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding method, outcome measures, duration of follow-up, type and source of financial support, and publication status from trial reports.

    Assessment of risk of bias and reporting quality in included studies

    Two independent review authors will evaluate the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias (ROB) assessment method.23 Assessment of the ROB will be performed according to the following seven domains: (1) random sequence generation, (2) allocation concealment, (3) blinding of participants and personnel, (4) blinding of outcome assessors, (5) incomplete outcome data, (6) selective reporting and (7) other sources of bias. The ROB of trials will be categorised as low, unclear or high risk of bias. When a consensus on assessment of the ROB cannot be achieved through consultations, the third author will decide.

    Measures of treatment effect

    Mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs will be used for the analysis of continuous data; standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs will be used if different scales were used to measure a certain outcome variable. Dichotomous data will be analysed using the relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs.

    Unit-of-analysis issues

    We will only focus on patient randomised studies. If crossover designed trials are included, we will only use data from the first session. Unit of analysis issues may arise from different follow-up times; we will group the data into three follow-up periods: (1) short term (less than 24 h), (2) medium term (1–7 days) and (3) long term (more than 1 week).

    Dealing with missing data

    If possible, we will contact the corresponding authors of the original trials to request missing data. If it is not possible to contact the original authors or obtain missing data, the analysis will rely on the available data.

    Assessment of heterogeneity

    According to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, heterogeneity will be assessed in the following three ways: (1) a visual check of the forest plot, (2) a heterogeneity χ2 test and (3) Higgins I2 statistic. In terms of the interpretation of the heterogeneity χ2 test, a significance level of p<0.10 will be considered meaningful heterogeneity. In terms of the interpretation of the Higgins I2 statistic, more than 50% will be considered meaningful heterogeneity.24 If meaningful heterogeneity among the included studies is identified, we will perform a subgroup analysis or a meta-regression analysis to determine the reason; if the heterogeneity cannot be resolved through additional analysis, we will not pool the data.

    Assessment of reporting biases

    If more than 10 studies are included, we will assess the reporting biases though funnel plots. When funnel plot asymmetry is detected, we will attempt to identify possible reasons (eg, publication bias, small study effect and true heterogeneity) through visual evaluation of the funnel plot and statistical analysis, such as Egger's test.25

    Data synthesis

    We will conduct a meta-analysis to estimate differences in primary and secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis will be performed using Review Manager Software (RevMan, V.5.3.5 for Windows; the Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark).26 Depending on the level of heterogeneity among included studies, we will apply a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model. When considerable heterogeneity is observed, a random-effects model with 95% CIs will be used in the analysis of pooled effect estimates. If meaningful heterogeneity, which cannot be explained by any additional assessment such as subgroup analysis, is identified among the included studies, we will not attempt to perform a meta-analysis. If necessary, subgroup analysis will be performed with careful consideration of each subgroup.

    Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity

    When it is necessary to interpret the heterogeneity of included studies and the data are sufficient, we will use subgroup analysis, according to the following:

    1. Type of control intervention (eg, no treatment, usual care or sham acupuncture);

    2. Type of acupuncture (eg, manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture or auricular acupuncture);

    3. Period of follow-up (<24 h, 1–7 days and more than 1 week).

    Sensitivity analysis

    We will implement a sensitivity analysis according to the following:

    1. Sample size: studies will be categorised into those with small or large samples according to whether they included fewer or more than 40 participants in each group.

    2. Analysis issues (eg, procedure for management of missing data).

    3. Methodological qualities.

    Summary of evidence

    The results of the primary outcomes will be presented in summary of findings tables (SOF Tables). The evidence level of the primary outcomes will be analysed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method.

    Discussion

    Numerous recent SRs and clinical trials have supported the effects of acupuncture for various types of postoperative pain;9 ,10 however, no reviews have assessed the evidence for the effects of acupuncture for postoperative pain following TKA. Furthermore, the types of acupuncture examined by most of the RCTs that evaluated the effects of this treatment for pain after knee surgery have been too diverse to assess the overall effects.15 ,16 ,20 Thus, we will comprehensively analyse the effects of acupuncture for postoperative pain after TKA; for this purpose, subgroup analysis will be conducted according to the type of acupuncture treatment, the type of control intervention and follow-up period. With respect to duration of follow-up, the condition of patients can be significantly influenced by various factors, such as psychological characteristics and presurgical conditions in the subacute or chronic postoperative period;27 therefore, we will divide our assessment into three different sessions (eg, short term, medium term and long term), and evaluate the results of each session separately. This review will provide current evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture therapy for postoperative pain after TKA and will clarify the benefits experienced by patients undergoing TKA to increase the knowledge base of practitioners of both traditional and complementary medicine.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Dye SF
      . Knee arthroplasty to maximize the envelope of function. In: Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor JMK, eds. Total knee arthroplasty. Springer, 2005:14–17.
    2. ↵
      1. Kurtz S,
      2. Ong K,
      3. Lau E, et al
      . Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:780. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00222
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Capdevila X,
      2. Barthelet Y,
      3. Biboulet P, et al
      . Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology 1999;91:8–15. doi:10.1097/00000542-199907000-00006
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Aveline C,
      2. Roux AL,
      3. Hetet HL, et al
      . Pain and recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a 12-month follow-up after a prospective randomized study evaluating Nefopam and Ketamine for early rehabilitation. Clin J Pain 2014;30:749–54. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000033
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Oderda G
      . Challenges in the management of acute postsurgical pain. Pharmacotherapy 2012;32(9 Suppl):6S–11S. doi:10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01177.x
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Katz J,
      2. Buis T,
      3. Cohen L
      . Locked out and still knocking: predictors of excessive demands for postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Can J Anaesth 2008;55:88–99. doi:10.1007/BF03016320
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Elmallah RK,
      2. Cherian JJ,
      3. Pierce TP, et al
      . New and common perioperative pain management techniques in total knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2015. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1549027 doi:10.1055/s-0035-1549027
    8. ↵
      1. Vickers AJ,
      2. Cronin AM,
      3. Maschino AC, et al
      . Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1444–53. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Sun Y,
      2. Gan TJ,
      3. Dubose JW, et al
      . Acupuncture and related techniques for postoperative pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:151–60. doi:10.1093/bja/aen146
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Cho Y-H,
      2. Kim C-K,
      3. Heo K-H, et al
      . Acupuncture for acute postoperative pain after back surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Pract 2015;15:279–91. doi:10.1111/papr.12208
      OpenUrl
    11. ↵
      1. Lu Z,
      2. Dong H,
      3. Wang Q, et al
      . Perioperative acupuncture modulation: more than anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2015;115:183–93. doi:10.1093/bja/aev227
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Wang H,
      2. Xie Y,
      3. Zhang Q, et al
      . Transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation reduces intra-operative remifentanil consumption and alleviates postoperative side-effects in patients undergoing sinusotomy: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2014;112:1075–82. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu001
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      1. Carlsson C
      . Acupuncture mechanisms for clinically relevant long-term effects—reconsideration and a hypothesis. Acupunct Med 2002;20:82–99. doi:10.1136/aim.20.2-3.82
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Napadow V,
      2. Ahn A,
      3. Longhurst J, et al
      . The status and future of acupuncture mechanism research. J Altern Complement Med 2008;14:861–9. doi:10.1089/acm.2008.SAR-3
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Chen C-C,
      2. Yang C-C,
      3. Hu C-C, et al
      . Acupuncture for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2015;40:31–6. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000138
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Mikashima Y,
      2. Takagi T,
      3. Tomatsu T, et al
      . Efficacy of acupuncture during post-acute phase of rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. J Tradit Chin Med 2012;32:545–8. doi:10.1016/S0254-6272(13)60068-0
      OpenUrl
    17. ↵
      1. Benyamin R,
      2. Trescot AM,
      3. Datta S, et al
      . Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician 2008;11(2 Suppl):S105–20.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. MacPherson H,
      2. Altman DG,
      3. Hammerschlag R, et al
      . Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. J Evid Based Med 2010;3:140–55. doi:10.1111/j.1756-5391.2010.01086.x
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Lao L,
      2. Hamilton GR,
      3. Fu J, et al
      . Is acupuncture safe? A systematic review of case reports. Altern Ther Health Med 2003;9:72–83.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. Gejervall AL,
      2. Stener-Victorin E,
      3. Möller A, et al
      . Electro-acupuncture versus conventional analgesia: a comparison of pain levels during oocyte aspiration and patients’ experiences of well-being after surgery. Hum Reprod 2005;20:728–35 doi:10.1093/humrep/deh665
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Bidwell S,
      2. Jensen MF
      . Etext on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Information Resources: Chapter 3: Using a Search Protocol to Identify Sources of Information: The COSI Model. [updated November 2005]. National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology. https://www-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/archive/20060905/nichsr/ehta/chapter3.html
    22. ↵
      1. Moher D,
      2. Liberati A,
      3. Tetzlaff J, et al
      . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–41. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Higgins JPT,
      2. Altman DG
      . Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008:187–241.
    24. ↵
      1. Higgins JPT,
      2. Thompson SG
      . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–58. doi:10.1002/sim.1186
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Sterne JAC,
      2. Egger M,
      3. Moher D
      . Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008:297–333.
    26. ↵
      1. Deeks JJ,
      2. Higgins JPT,
      3. Altman DG
      . Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008:243–96.
    27. ↵
      1. Singh JA,
      2. Lewallen DG
      . Medical and psychological comorbidity predicts poor pain outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:916–23. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes402
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Footnotes

    • Contributors S-hC contributed to the conception of this review. The review protocol was drafted by J-YJ, and was revised by S-hC. The search strategy was established by all authors. J-YJ and J-HC will independently screen the searched studies, extract the data from the eligible studies, assess the risk of bias and conduct the meta-analysis. All authors approved the publication of this review protocol.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.