You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Public health
Research
A cross-sectional study on socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among elderly Chinese
  1. Xiaoguang Ma1,
  2. Sarah M McGhee2
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
  2. 2Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  1. Correspondence to Xiaoguang Ma; ma26{at}email.sc.edu

Abstract

Objectives To examine the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a sample of elderly Chinese people in Hong Kong.

Study Design Cross-sectional study.

Setting 18 elderly health centers in Hong Kong.

Participants This study was based on a cohort aged 65 years or above who were enrolled in the Elderly Health Services from 1998 to 2005 in Hong Kong. Initially, 3324 individuals were randomly sampled from the baseline database. In the end, 2441 successful cases were obtained for the telephone survey. After excluding cases with missing SES or HRQOL information and the cases whose questionnaires were answered by their family members, 2347 individuals were included in the final analysis.

Results Elderly Chinese with less subjective economic hardship reported much better self-rated health (SRH) (OR 1.57–4.70, all p<0.01)< and higher Medical Outcomes Study short form (SF)12 scores (β 2.56–10.26, all p<0.01) than those with economic hardship. Male individuals in the highest education and occupation subgroup reported better HRQOL comparing with the baseline subgroup (OR for SRH 1.91–3.26, p<0.01; β 2.63–4.96, p<0.05). Two economic indicators, income and expenditure, only showed significant positive associations with physical SF12 scores for men (β 2.91–5.42, all p<0.05). Housing tenure was associated with SRH (OR 1.34 for men and 1.27 for women, p<0.05) but not SF12 scores.

Conclusions Economic hardship showed the strongest association with HRQOL among all SES indicators. Educational level, occupational level and economic indicators tended to associate with physical HRQOL only among elderly Chinese men. More attention should be placed on subjective SES indicators when investigating influences on HRQOL among elderly Chinese people.

  • Public Health
  • Social Medicine

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

https://doi-org.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002418

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Article summary

    Article focus

    • The effect of socioeconomic status on health-related quality of life among the elderly Chinese population.

    Key messages

    • Most indicators of socioeconomic status were associated with health-related quality of life among the elderly Chinese.

    • Subjective socioeconomic status indicators showed a much stronger association with health-related quality of life than objective indicators among elderly Chinese population.

    • Educational level, occupational level and economic indicators such as income and expenditure tended to associate with physical dimension of health-related quality of life only among the elderly Chinese men.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • This is the first study to examine socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among the elderly Chinese population.

    • Survival bias may exist because the baseline survey was voluntary and we excluded all those who had died in the telephone survey.

    • A large number of the elderly Chinese in Hong Kong receive a welfare payment from the Hong Kong government and they may report this as their monthly income.

    • There may be floor or ceiling effects for self-reported health because we have only three categories for this variable.

    Background

    There is a well-established inverse relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and health according to which people with higher SES experience fewer health problems compared with people with lower SES.1–3 This association has been identified at both individual-level4–7 and neighbourhood-level SES indicators8 ,9 for almost all health outcomes including mortality,10–12 morbidity13 ,14 and disability.13–16

    With ageing populations and the increasing burden of chronic diseases, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has been paid more attention. SES has been linked to several measures of HRQOL in previous studies, including self-rated health (SRH),17–19 the Medical Outcomes Study short form (SF) 36/20/1220–25 and other measures.26 ,27 People with higher SES are more likely to report better HRQOL than those with lower SES. Using the most validated instrument of HRQOL, Thumboo et al found that there was a 0.5–0.6 point increase in the SF36 score per year's increase in education and 3.5–4.0 points increase in score with a better housing type.23 In a Norwegian study using SF12, researchers found that both physical and mental dimensions of HRQOL were correlated with education and occupation.28

    Although consistent results were reported in previous studies about SES and HRQOL, the evidence was still limited among Chinese populations, especially among elderly people. Lam et al examined the effect of HRQOL on health service utilities and validated SF12 in a Chinese sample; however, no studies were conducted on SES by them.29 ,30 Cheng et al used a subjective SES indicator (economic hardship) and found that Chinese who reported economic hardship were more likely to rate a lower SRH.31 Several recent studies examined SES and HRQOL among the Chinese, but all focused on special populations such as the elderly living alone,32 elderly with hearing impairment33 or patients with some diseases.34 To date, no studies have investigated the association between SES and HRQOL among healthy elderly Chinese.

    This study was designed to measure SES and HRQOL in a representative sample of elderly Chinese people in Hong Kong, and to identify the potential relationship between SES indicators and HRQOL. Findings from the present study will enhance our understanding of the effect of SES on HRQOL, and provide recommendations on the improvement of HRQOL among elderly Chinese.

    Methods

    Study design and study population

    This was a cross-sectional study with a combination of baseline data and a subsequent telephone survey several years later. The individuals in the baseline database were recruited by the Elderly Health Services (EHS) of the Department of Health, Hong Kong Government, in their Elderly Health Centers (EHC), from May 1998 to December 2005. The individuals were ambulatory, aged at least 65 at enrolment and likely to be representative of the healthy elderly Chinese in Hong Kong. When the participants first registered, a detailed face-to-face interview was performed by trained nurses of EHC using a standardised questionnaire developed by EHS comprising information on demographic (age, sex, marital status, height and weight), lifestyle (smoking, alcohol use and exercise), socioeconomic (educational level, living alone or not, social contact and finance), health-related and disease-related information (hospitalisation, active diseases, number of falls, medication, SRH and family history of chronic diseases). In order to collect information about SES and HRQOL, a telephone survey was performed that was aimed at 3324 individuals randomly sampled from the baseline database after stratification by age and gender from October 2006 to January 2007. The mean time of gap from baseline interview to telephone survey was 1985±765 days (ranging from 302 to 3137 days). In order to obtain the most updated data, information on marriage, smoking, alcohol use, exercise, hospitalisation and living-alone-or-not was also collected during the telephone interview, even though we had such information from the baseline survey. In the end, 2441 successful cases were obtained for the telephone survey with a crude response rate of 67.4% (2441/3324) and an adjusted response rate of 92.6% (2441/(2441+49 refused+147 unreached)). After excluding cases with missing SES or HRQOL information (N=78) and cases whose questionnaires were answered by their family members (N=16), 2347 individuals were included in the final analysis. The telephone interview was performed in Cantonese. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the University of Hong Kong and of the Department of Health.

    Measures

    Six SES indicators were included in this study: education, housing tenure, previous occupation, monthly income, monthly expenditure and economic hardship. Education was coded into five categories from the highest postsecondary, through secondary, primary, uneducated but can read and write, to the lowest, illiterate. Housing tenure was defined as self-owned or non-self-owned. Since most individuals were now retired from work, the question about occupation sought information on the job with the longest duration in the past. For occupation, three categories for men (professional, technical and elementary workers) and four categories for women (professional, technical, unemployed and elementary workers) were coded, because only a few men were unemployed for long periods. Monthly income was coded into six categories, <1000, 1000–1999, 2000–2999, 3000–5999, 6000–9999 and ≥10 000 HK$, and monthly expenditure was coded into five categories, <2000, 2000–2999, 3000–5999, 6000–9999 and ≥10 000 HK$. A simple question was used to evaluate self-rated economic hardship: ‘Do you think you have sufficient money to cover your daily expenses?’, and the answers were ‘more than enough’, ‘enough’, ‘just right’ and ‘insufficient’.31

    HRQOL information was collected in the telephone survey based on SRH and SF12. SRH was measured by a simple question in which individuals were asked to rate their health status compared to their peers, and the possible answers were ‘better’, ‘normal’ or ‘worse’. The SF12, an abbreviated version of the SF36 health questionnaire, covers 8 domains with 12 items and measures HRQOL in a physical component score (PCS12) and a mental component score (MCS12).35 The instrument has been validated in Hong Kong and, by using the same scoring system as the standard SF12 but weighting using the Chinese (HK)-specific PCS and MCS regression coefficients for each item response,36 the PCS12 and MCS12 scores could range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicated a better HRQOL and vice versa.29–30

    Covariates in this study included age, marriage (married, single, ex-married including widowed and divorced), living alone or not (yes, no)<add and>, smoking history (never smoking, currently smoking or quit smoking), alcohol use (drink at least 1 day/week in the past 1 month or not), exercise (times/week), body mass index (BMI), hospitalisation (yes, no), diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart diseases, musculoskeletal disease, chronic pulmonary disease and hearing loss (yes, no).

    Statistical analysis

    The sample size calculation was based on being able to identify a difference of ±0.1 in the weight measure, which ranged from 0 to 1.0. With an α of 5%, power of 90% and a two-sided test, a minimum of 1680 individuals was needed. The calculation was conducted by G-power software. To allow for incomplete and inconsistent data, we planned to aim for 2400 individuals to be interviewed. In addition, considering the dead cases, missing cases and non-response cases during the interview, according to the experiences of former studies based on this EHS database (response rate was about 71.1%) and the outcome of a pilot study (response rate was 88.5%), 3400 cases were initially sampled to meet the target of 2400 cases. The data were entered into Excel (Microsoft) and, by matching individuals’ unique Hong Kong ID numbers, the data from the telephone survey were merged with the baseline database. Means and proportions were compared between men and women for continuous and categorical variables by t test or χ2 test, respectively. Because a significant difference was found among most of the variables between the two genders, all of the multivariate analyses were performed with stratification on gender. Ordinal Logistic regression models were used to examine the effect of SES on SRH, since there were three ordered scales for SRH. General Linear Models were used to identify the association between SF12 score (PCS12 and MCS12) and SES. Colinearity and interactions were examined in all models. Only one variable was kept in the model if colinearity was detected between the variables. Significant interaction terms were included in the models if detected. All of the above covariates were included in the models unless colinearity was found. When examining the association between an SES indicator with HRQOL outcomes, all other SES indicators were included in the adjusted models as covariates. Because correlation was found between education and occupation, income and expenditure, only one indicator of each pair was included in the adjusted models. For example, if education was the independent variable in the model, occupation was excluded due to the correlation with education, and income but not expenditure was included in the model due to the correlation between the two. If expenditure was the independent variable, income was excluded due to the correlation with occupation, and education but not occupation was included in the model due to the correlation between the two. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS V.9.2 (Cary, North Carolina, USA).

    Results

    Characteristics of the sample for the telephone survey were summarised by gender in table 1. The average age of the male and female individuals was the same because we sampled the individuals by age and gender. Male respondents were more inclined to be married, to be current smokers and alcohol users, and to have lower BMI than female respondents. Elderly Chinese men were more likely to have a higher educational level, live in a self-owned house, have a lower monthly income and a higher monthly expenditure, report less economic hardship, and have a higher level of occupation than similarly aged women. For the outcomes of HRQOL, men were more likely to report better SRH than women in this study. Both physical and mental component SF12 scores were higher in men than in women in this sample.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Characteristics of the sample for telephone survey by gender

    Table 2 showed the results of adjusted ordinal logistic regression for SRH and each SES indicator. Subjects with higher educational levels reported better SRH than those with lower educational levels, especially for men with postsecondary and secondary level education. Elderly people living in their own houses were more likely to report better SRH than those living in rented or public housing. Compared to the lowest income group, men with 6000–9999 HK$ monthly income reported better SRH; however, no difference was found between the other groups. Male professional or technical workers and female professional or unemployed workers were more likely to report better SRH than elementary workers. Economic hardship showed the strongest relationship with SRH among all the SES indicators. For men, current smoking, hospitalisation in the past 12 months and diagnosis of chronic diseases were associated with worse SRH. For women, only hospitalisation and diagnosis of chronic diseases were associated with worse SRH.

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Results of adjusted ordinal logistic regression models for SRH and SES indicators

    The results on associations between SES indicators and PCS12 as well as MCS12 scores were presented in tables 3 and 4, respectively. For men, a significant association was found between PCS12 score and SES for all SES indicators except housing tenure, which indicated that men with higher SES were more likely to report a higher PCS12 score. Only education and economic hardship were found to be related to PCS12 scores for elderly women. Significant associations were found for education (postsecondary vs illiterate), occupation (professional and technical vs elementary for men, professional vs elementary for women) and economic hardship with MCS12. Economic hardship was identified as the strongest predictor for both mental and physical SF12 scores among the six SES indicators. For the covariates, elderly Chinese with older age, hospitalisation in the past months and diagnosis of chronic diseases experienced a lower PCS12 score. Exercise was positively associated with MCS12, but BMI was negatively associated with MCS12 in men. Women with younger age, ex-married marriage status, hospitalisation, and a diagnosis of chronic diseases experienced lower MCS12.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Results of the adjusted general linear model for PCS12 and SES indicators

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Results of the adjusted general linear model for MCS12 and SES indicators

    Discussion

    Most of the elderly people reported SRH not worse than their peers. The average PCS12 score was 40.3 and MCS12 score was 51.5 among this elderly Chinese sample. Men tended to report better HRQOL than women. Educational level and occupation were positively associated with HRQOL. Housing tenure was significantly associated with SRH only. Economic SES indicators (monthly income and expenditure) only showed a weak association with physical SF12 scores in men. Economic hardship showed the strongest association with HRQOL among all SES indicators in both men and women.

    Using SRH and SF12 as measurements of HRQOL, our results confirmed the association between HRQOL and education5 ,37–42 and occupation among a Chinese sample.6 ,43 ,44 Housing tenure was only found to be related to SRH for both men and women. This result confirmed the findings in Dunn's study that the people living in rented houses were approximately three times as likely to report worse SRH than those living in self-owned houses.4 In this study, we present results similar to previous studies which showed that HRQOL inequalities by SES are larger in the physical domain than in the mental domain of HRQOL.22 ,23

    Objective economic SES indicators (monthly income and expenditure) showed only a weak association with the physical domain of HRQOL in the present study, which conflicts with the findings from several previous studies.7 ,42 However, subjective economic SES indicators of economic hardship showed strong associations with all HRQOL measurements in both men and women. The findings of non-significant associations between HRQOL and economic SES indicators might be because many of our poorer elderly individuals received a welfare payment from the Hong Kong Government. Because income was not a good indicator for people after retirement, we included monthly expenditure in our telephone survey. However, expenditure showed no associations with any HRQOL measures. Because many elderly Chinese live with their children or other family members, we cannot tell whether the expenditure was for the whole family or themselves. Economic hardship showed the strongest association with HRQOL in the present study. Economic hardship was identified to have a much stronger association with SRH than educational level by Cheng et al31; however, few studies contained both economic hardship and other SES indicators. With respect to this strong association, there were some possible explanations. At first, obviously, economic hardship was more meaningful than income. Higher income does not mean more available money, if compared with higher expenditure, but economic hardship does. In addition, people with greater economic hardship endured much more pressures and depressions, which in turn affected health. In this study, economic hardship was found to be more strongly related to mental than physical HRQOL. This was mainly due to the subjectivity character of economic hardship (MCS was more subjective than PCS). According to the outcomes in the present study, economic hardship showed a stronger positive association in women than in men, in contrast to other SES indicators. This indicator may truly reflect the difference between these two sexes that women were more likely to care about their available money and avoid the occurrence of economic hardship than men. This potential explanation coincided with the different perceptions towards money management between the two sexes in Chinese.

    Men were more likely to report better HRQOL than women in the present study, which confirmed the findings based on western populations in previous studies.18 ,21 For objective SES indicators (education, housing tenure, occupation and income), men showed stronger associations with HRQOL than women. However, for subjective SES indicators of economic hardship, the association with HRQOL was a little stronger in women than in men. The difference by sex can be ascribed to a different structure of educational level and occupation between men and women. For instance, compared to men, 80% of the female elderly Chinese had primary or lower education. This concentration attenuated the difference of HRQOL with the baseline group in females, which resulted in the different association between the sexes. The difference between men and women for the relationship between HRQOL and economic SES indicators might be attributed to the fact that the income of the whole family is often managed by the wife in Chinese families.

    Several limitations need to be considered. First, as mentioned in many SES and health studies, the cross-sectional design was the most important limitation of this study. Even though we have baseline data and a follow-up telephone survey, our design was still cross-sectional because no longitudinal data were collected and used. Second, the baseline elderly sample may not represent the whole elderly population in Hong Kong. Because the individuals recruited in the baseline were all volunteers, they may be healthier and more careful with their health. In addition, we sampled the individuals stratified by age and sex for the telephone survey; thus, we included more older and male people in the telephone sample. We also excluded the aged with speaking and listening disabilities from the sample during the telephone survey. Thus, the results may not be generalised to the whole Hong Kong elderly population. Third, survival bias may exist because the attendance, which gave rise to enrolment, and the baseline surveys were voluntary and we excluded all those who had died in the telephone survey. Fourth, there were some flaws in the SES indicators. A large number of elderly Chinese in Hong Kong receive a welfare payment from the Hong Kong government and they may report this as their monthly income. We grouped housing tenure into self-owned house and others, so we did not know the size and quality of the houses. In the end, there may be floor or ceiling effects for SRH because we have only three categories for SRH.

    There were several advantages in this study. At first, this may be the first study to identify the association between all individual SES indicators and HRQOL based on SRH and SF-12 among the healthy elderly Chinese population. In addition, six individual-level SES indicators were contained in the present study, including expenditure and economic hardship, which scarcely occurred in these kinds of studies. Together with demographic, lifestyle and chronic disease factors, these SES indicators were also adjusted in multivariate models. Moreover, this study was conducted in a large sample and the response rate was good when compared with other similar designs. In the meantime, disease factors, which may have a big role in HRQOL in the elderly, were controlled in this study.

    In conclusion, elderly Chinese men reported better HRQOL than women. Economic hardship, education, housing tenure and occupation were identified to be associated with HRQOL among elderly Chinese. Subjective SES indicators might impact more on HRQOL among elderly people than more traditional objective measures. Future research is needed to interpret the strong association between subjective SES indicator and HRQOL among elderly Chinese. Only individual level measures of SES were included in the present study; thus, SES at the community and neighbourhood levels were needed. Considering the positive association between SES and HRQOL, improving the SES level seems to be the most direct way to gain HRQOL benefits among elderly Chinese.

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank Annie Cheung for her help on telephone survey and data management, and Lai Chin Wong, June Chau and Ada Ho for their suggestions on data analysis.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Adler NE,
      2. Boyce WT,
      3. Chesney MA,
      4. et al
      . Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution. JAMA 1993;269:3140–5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Feinstein JS
      . The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Milbank Q 1993;71:279–322.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Lee PR,
      2. Moss N,
      3. Krieger N
      . Measuring social inequalities in health. Report on the Conference of the National Institutes of Health. Public Health Rep 1995;110:302–5.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Dunn JR
      . Housing and inequalities in health: a study of socioeconomic dimensions of housing and self reported health from a survey of Vancouver residents. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:671–81.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Feldman JJ,
      2. Makuc DM,
      3. Kleinman JC,
      4. et al
      . National trends in educational differentials in mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:919–33.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Marmot MG,
      2. Shipley MJ
      . Do socioeconomic differences in mortality persist after retirement? 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study. BMJ 1996;313:1177–80.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. McDonough P,
      2. Duncan GJ,
      3. Williams D,
      4. et al
      . Income dynamics and adult mortality in the United States, 1972 through 1989. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1476–83.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Osler M,
      2. Prescott E
      . Educational level as a contextual and proximate determinant of all cause mortality in Danish adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:266–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Steenland K,
      2. Henley J,
      3. Calle E,
      4. et al
      . Individual- and area-level socioeconomic status variables as predictors of mortality in a cohort of 179,383 persons. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:1047–56.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Huisman M,
      2. Kunst AE,
      3. Andersen O,
      4. et al
      . Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality among elderly people in 11 European populations. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:468–75.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Kunst AE,
      2. Mackenbach JP
      . The size of mortality differences associated with educational level in nine industrialized countries. Am J Public Health 1994;84:932–7.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Mackenbach JP,
      2. Kunst AE,
      3. Cavelaars AE,
      4. et al
      . Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. The EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Lancet 1997;349:1655–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Cavelaars AE,
      2. Kunst AE,
      3. Geurts JJ,
      4. et al
      . Differences in self reported morbidity by educational level: a comparison of 11 western European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:219–27.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    14. ↵
      1. Huisman M,
      2. Kunst AE,
      3. Mackenbach JP
      . Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity among the elderly; a European overview. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:861–73.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      1. Matthews RJ,
      2. Jagger C,
      3. Hancock RM
      . Does socio-economic advantage lead to a longer, healthier old age? Soc Sci Med 2006;62:2489–99.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Matthews RJ,
      2. Smith LK,
      3. Hancock RM,
      4. et al
      . Socioeconomic factors associated with the onset of disability in older age: a longitudinal study of people aged 75 years and over. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:1567–75.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Bobak M,
      2. Pikhart H,
      3. Hertzman C,
      4. et al
      . Socioeconomic factors, perceived control and self-reported health in Russia. A cross-sectional survey. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:269–79.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Molarius A,
      2. Berglund K,
      3. Eriksson C,
      4. et al
      . Socioeconomic conditions, lifestyle factors, and self-rated health among men and women in Sweden. Eur J Public Health 2007;17:125–33.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Subramanian SV,
      2. Kim D,
      3. Kawachi I
      . Covariation in the socioeconomic determinants of self rated health and happiness: a multivariate multilevel analysis of individuals and communities in the USA. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:664–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. ↵
      1. Drukker M,
      2. van Os J
      . Mediators of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation and quality of life. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2003;38:698–706.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      1. Hemingway H,
      2. Nicholson A,
      3. Stafford M,
      4. et al
      . The impact of socioeconomic status on health functioning as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire: the Whitehall II Study. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1484–90.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Regidor E,
      2. Barrio G,
      3. de la Fuente L,
      4. et al
      . Association between educational level and health related quality of life in Spanish adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:75–82.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    23. ↵
      1. Thumboo J,
      2. Fong KY,
      3. Machin D,
      4. et al
      . Quality of life in an urban Asian population: the impact of ethnicity and socio-economic status. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:1761–72.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. Yamazaki S,
      2. Fukuhara S,
      3. Suzukamo Y
      . Household income is strongly associated with health-related quality of life among Japanese men but not women. Public Health 2005;119:561–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Pappa E,
      2. Kontodimopoulos N,
      3. Papadopoulos AA,
      4. et al
      . Assessing the socio-economic and demographic impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from Greece. Int J Public Health 2009;54:241–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      1. Drukker M,
      2. Feron FJ,
      3. van Os J
      . Income inequality at neighbourhood level and quality of life—a contextual analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004;39:457–63.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    27. ↵
      1. Wang H,
      2. Kindig DA,
      3. Mullahy J
      . Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: results from a EuroQol study in Beijing, China. Qual Life Res 2005;14:119–32.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Riise T,
      2. Moen BE,
      3. Nortvedt MW
      . Occupation, lifestyle factors and health-related quality of life: the Hordaland Health Study. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45:324–32.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. Lam CL,
      2. Fong DY,
      3. Lauder IJ,
      4. et al
      . The effect of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) on health service utilisation of a Chinese population. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:1635–46.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Lam CL,
      2. Gandek B,
      3. Ren XS,
      4. et al
      . Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1139–47.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Cheng YH,
      2. Chi I,
      3. Boey KW,
      4. et al
      . Self-rated economic condition and the health of elderly persons in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:1415–24.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Wang H,
      2. Chen K,
      3. Zhou B,
      4. et al
      . (Study on social determinants and health-related quality of life among the ‘empty nest’ (lonely) elderly Chinese people). Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2010;31:400–4.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Wong LL,
      2. Cheng LK
      . Quality of life in older Chinese-speaking adults with hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:655–64.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Jia TW,
      2. Utzinger J,
      3. Deng Y,
      4. et al
      . Quantifying quality of life and disability of patients with advanced schistosomiasis japonica. PLoS Neglected Trop Dis 2011;5:e966.
      OpenUrl
    35. ↵
      1. Ware JE,
      2. Kolinski M,
      3. Keller SD
      . How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summaries: a user's manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1995.
    36. ↵
      1. Lam CL,
      2. Tse EY,
      3. Gandek B
      . Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res 2005;14:539–47.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Bopp M,
      2. Minder CE
      . Mortality by education in German speaking Switzerland, 1990–1997: results from the Swiss National Cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:346–54.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    38. ↵
      1. Borrell C,
      2. Regidor E,
      3. Arias LC,
      4. et al
      . Inequalities in mortality according to educational level in two large Southern European cities. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:58–63.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Elo IT,
      2. Preston SH
      . Educational differentials in mortality: United States, 1979–85. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:47–57.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    40. ↵
      1. Huisman M,
      2. Kunst AE,
      3. Bopp M,
      4. et al
      . Educational inequalities in cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and older men and women in eight western European populations. Lancet 2005;365:493–500.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    41. ↵
      1. Lahelma E,
      2. Valkonen T
      . Health and social inequities in Finland and elsewhere. Soc Sci Med 1990;31:257–65.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    42. ↵
      1. Rognerud MA,
      2. Zahl PH
      . Social inequalities in mortality: changes in the relative importance of income, education and household size over a 27-year period. Eur J Public Health 2006;16:62–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    43. ↵
      1. Evans J,
      2. Repper J
      . Employment, social inclusion and mental health. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2000;7:15–24.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    44. ↵
      1. Kotler P,
      2. Wingard DL
      . The effect of occupational, marital and parental roles on mortality: the Alameda County Study. Am J Public Health 1989;79:607–12.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science

    Footnotes

    • Contributors XM and SMM carried out the study concept and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, as well as a critical revision of the manuscript and statistical analysis. XM drafted the manuscript. SMM obtained the funding and supervised the study.

    • Funding This study was supported by funding from the Research Grants Council University Grant Committee Competitive Earmarked Research Grants (HKU 7448/05H).

    • Competing interests None.

    • Ethics approval The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the University of Hong Kong and of the Department of Health.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data sharing statement There are no additional data available.