Article Text
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the association between primary dysmenorrhoea and quality of life, mental health and academic performance among medical students in Indonesia.
Design A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted among Indonesian medical students. Primary dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity, as well as their associations with quality of life, mental health and academic performance, were assessed using validated questionnaires. The associations of dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity were analysed alongside other potential independent variables, including age, region, stage of study and parental income. Statistical analyses included χ2 tests, t-tests and multiple regression models to adjust for confounders (p<0.05).
Setting and participants Indonesia (June–July 2021: n=630 medical students).
Outcomes The primary outcomes were quality of life, mental health and academic performance, assessed as dependent variables. Quality of life was measured using the Quality of Life Scale, mental health was assessed through depression and stress scores from the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-42; and academic performance was evaluated through concentration and activity disruption, absenteeism and cum laude grade point average (GPA). The independent variables were primary dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity, categorised as mild or moderate-to-severe using the Verbal Multidimensional Scoring System.
Results Primary dysmenorrhoea was significantly associated with reduced quality of life, mental health challenges and academic disruptions. Students with dysmenorrhoea had significantly lower Quality of Life scores (–1.82, 95% CI: –2.63 to –1.02; p<0.001), with moderate-to-severe pain linked to an even more significant reduction (–2.09, 95% CI: –2.54 to –1.63; p<0.001). Dysmenorrhoea occurrence was significantly associated with depression (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.23 to 3.81; p=0.007), while severity was associated with both depression (OR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.47 to 2.92; p<0.001) and stress (OR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.62; p<0.001). Dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity significantly disrupted concentration (OR 12.92, 95% CI: 6.14 to 27.22; p<0.001 and OR 7.24, 95% CI: 4.68 to 11.19; p<0.001, respectively), activities (OR 34.95, 95% CI: 4.77 to 256.16; p<0.001 and OR 6.92, 95% CI: 4.63 to 10.36; p<0.001) and absenteeism (OR 12.10, 95% CI: 1.65 to 88.83; p=0.014 and OR 5.65, 95% CI: 3.32 to 9.63; p<0.001). Cum laude GPA was not significantly associated.
Conclusions Primary dysmenorrhoea is significantly associated with the quality of life, mental health and academic performance of medical students in Indonesia. Addressing its implications can enhance student well-being and academic outcomes.
- Quality of Life
- MENTAL HEALTH
- Dysmenorrhea
- MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING
- Health Surveys
- Reproductive medicine
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available on reasonable request. The original raw data analysed are available from the corresponding author and can be presented on reasonable request.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- Quality of Life
- MENTAL HEALTH
- Dysmenorrhea
- MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING
- Health Surveys
- Reproductive medicine
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
Primary dysmenorrhoea is significantly associated with the quality of life, mental health and academic performance of Indonesian medical students.
Multiple binary logistic regression analysis enables the control of potential confounders, such as age, region, stage of study and parental income.
The cross-sectional nature of the study does not allow for the establishment of causality between dysmenorrhoea and the observed outcomes.
The reliance on self-reported data may introduce bias due to possible variations among participants' perceptions of dysmenorrhoea severity.
The results might not be generalisable beyond this specific population of Indonesian medical students.
Introduction
Dysmenorrhoea is a condition characterised by recurring lower abdominal pain associated with uterine contractions during menstruation.1 2 It is the most common gynaecological problem among women across all age ranges and races worldwide. A meta-analysis estimates that 71.1% of all women experience dysmenorrhoea, irrespective of the economic status of their country of origin.3 4 Based on its pathophysiology, dysmenorrhoea is divided into two types: primary dysmenorrhoea, where there is no identifiable underlying organic disease and secondary dysmenorrhoea, which is caused by other identifiable diseases. Primary dysmenorrhoea is particularly prevalent among young females, often starting within 6 to 24 months after menarche. The pain often follows a clear cyclic pattern, being most intense on the first day of menstruation and lasting up to 72 hours.2 5 Despite its high prevalence, primary dysmenorrhoea is often inadequately managed, as many women perceive it as a normal part of menstruation and hesitate to seek medical advice due to social taboos and embarrassment. This stigma and reluctance to seek proper care for menstrual issues, hinders early detection of underlying diseases and the diagnosis of secondary dysmenorrhoea, which further complicates differentiation between primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea, particularly in settings with limited diagnostic resources.2 6
Dysmenorrhoea has well-documented consequences throughout a woman’s life. A study involving 21 573 women found that dysmenorrhoea significantly contributes to absenteeism from school or university (20.1%), reduced concentration and academic performance during episodes (40.6%) and decreased participation in school activities (29.6%).3 Moreover, it creates a notable disparity in healthcare burdens, where women with either primary (2.2 times) or secondary dysmenorrhoea (2.9 times) incurring higher healthcare service costs compared with the general female population.7 Another study also mentioned the higher prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress-related disorders among women with dysmenorrhoea.8 Primary dysmenorrhoea, in particular, raises the likelihood of major depressive disorder by over 70%.9 Despite these extensive findings, public awareness of dysmenorrhea, either primary or secondary, remains relatively low.
Part of the reason behind the limited public awareness surrounding dysmenorrhoea may be the absence of large-scale, comprehensive research highlighting its burden in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in Indonesia. While studies from countries such as India, Malaysia, Iran and Nigeria have provided some insights into the issue, these investigations have been limited in scale and regional in focus.3 Comprehensive national data on the associations between dysmenorrhoea, especially primary dysmenorrhoea, due to its common prevalence and disruptions to the daily lives of many women are urgently needed to inform stakeholders and raise public awareness about this condition.
Medical students were chosen as the study population because they represent younger, productive-aged women, a demographic where disruptions to daily life caused by dysmenorrhoea can significantly impact academic performance and future career prospects. This group is also most affected by primary dysmenorrhoea, which tends to be most prevalent during adolescence and early adulthood.2 3 Additionally, their medical background allows for more accurate self-reporting of symptoms, potentially improving the quality of data collection. Furthermore, our focus aligns with similar studies10–13 conducted in other countries, enabling more direct comparisons between studies. Finally, involving medical students in dysmenorrhoea research might enhance their awareness of the condition as prospective physicians.
This study aims to investigate the associations between primary dysmenorrhoea and quality of life, mental health and academic performance among medical students across Indonesia.
Methods
As part of the research project ‘Primary Dysmenorrhoea: Prevalence, Perception, Behaviour and Quality of Life among Medical Students in Indonesia’ conducted by the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, this study aimed to investigate the association between primary dysmenorrhoea and quality of life, mental health and academic performance among medical students in Indonesia. The research protocol was approved by the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia and the Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee in accordance with good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki (Reference No. 344/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2021).
Study design and participants
This study employed a cross-sectional design. Data were collected using an online questionnaire via Google Forms (docs.google.com/forms) from 17 June to 31 July 2021. The survey link was distributed through social media platforms (eg, WhatsApp, Instagram and LINE) and shared within medical student organisations. Representatives from all 89 medical schools in Indonesia, including both public and private institutions, were contacted and asked to distribute the survey to their peers. While the exact number of students who received the survey is unknown, 676 responses were collected and 630 valid responses were included in the analysis. The inclusion criteria were female medical students who consented, menstruated, were of Indonesian nationality, resided in Indonesia at the time of answering the survey and had no previous pelvic pathology diagnosis. Consent to participate was obtained by answering a yes-no question on the first page of the online form.
We acknowledge that aspects such as school type (public vs private) and geographic location may represent potential confounding factors. However, our sample reflects the national distribution of medical schools across Indonesia. The minimum sample size was established using the online Raosoft, Inc. (Seattle, WA) sample size calculator.14 We used a prior study to estimate the population of female undergraduate medical students in Indonesia (±31 250).15 The calculation assumed a 5% margin of error, a 95% confidence level and a response distribution of 50% to maximise variability. Using these parameters, the minimum required sample size was determined to be 380 participants. Ultimately, 676 responses were collected, with 630 valid responses included in the analysis.
Measurement tool and data management
Participants’ academic performance—including concentration and activity disruption, absenteeism and cum laude grade point average (GPA) (≥3.50/4.00)—was measured using a validated questionnaire in Bahasa Indonesia, employed in a similar yet small-scale research on dysemenorrhoea among Jakartan students by Derdameisya and Affandi (2014).16 We also adapted their translation of Quality of Life Scale17 to measure participants’ quality of life, as well as the Verbal Multidimensional Scoring System18 to assess the severity of dysmenorrhoea. Severity was then categorised into dichotomous pain levels of mild and moderate-to-severe. Mental health conditions were measured using the Damanik Bahasa Indonesia translation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-4219 and included the conditions of depression and stress. We also gathered sociodemographic information on age, body mass index, region of domicile, stage of study and parental income, as well as information on participants’ menstrual history, including age of menarche, cycle regularity and length and menstrual duration (table 1).
Sociodemographic and menstrual status
Statistical analysis
Responses from Google Forms were imported into MS Excel for Office 365 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) for data cleaning and coding. The data cleaning process involved the following steps: First, incomplete responses were identified and excluded (eg, participants who did not complete the questionnaire). Next, duplicate entries were checked and removed to ensure that each participant was represented only once. Finally, categorical variables were reviewed for consistency (eg, ensuring uniformity in coding for demographic categories), and continuous variables were checked for outliers or implausible values using descriptive statistics.
The cleaned dataset was then analysed using STATA V.18.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX). Dichotomous data were presented as frequencies and proportions, while continuous data were presented as mean ± SD. The associations between independent variables—primary dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity—and affected areas of daily life—quality of life, mental health and academic performance—were examined using χ2 and t-tests, depending on the variable measurement (table 2). Variables with significant p values (<0.05) were then included as dependent variables in multiple linear or logistic regression models, where appropriate (table 3). The independent variables of primary dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity were assessed in conjunction with other potential confounders, namely age, region, stage of study and parental income.20
Proportion of primary dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity on areas of life with unadjusted estimates
Multiple logistic and linear regression analyses with confounder adjusted estimates
Patient and public involvement
Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research.
Results
Descriptive attributes of study participants
A total of 676 participants completed the questionnaire, with 630 valid respondents included in the analysis due to incomplete data from 46 participants. Most respondents were in their preclinical years (85.87%) and aged 20 to 24 years (66.35%). A significant proportion resided in Java (57.78%), Indonesia’s most populous and developed island, which is home to more than half of the national population. Detailed sociodemographic and menstrual characteristics are presented in table 1.
Associations between primary dysmenorrhoea and quality of life, mental health and academic performance among Indonesian medical students
Quality of life
Quality of life was found to have a significant association with primary dysmenorrhea occurrence and severity. After adjusting for confounders (table 3), it was found that students with primary dysmenorrhoea had a –1.82 (95% CI: –2.63, –1.02, p<0.001) lowered Quality of Life score compared with students without primary dysmenorrhoea. Moreover, in students with primary dysmenorrhoea, having moderate-to-severe pain was associated with a reduction of –2.09 (95% CI: –2.54, –1.63, p<0.001).
Mental health
Out of all the participants, 373 (59.21%) were found to exhibit symptoms of depression of varying degrees, while stress was found among 436 (69.21%) participants, where it was more predominant (table 2). Multiple logistic regression (table 3) found significant associations of both primary dysmenorrhea occurrence (OR 2.16 (95% CI: 1.23 to 3.81), p=0.007) and severity (OR 2.07 (95% CI: 1.47 to 2.92), p<0.001) with depression. However, only dysmenorrhoea severity was significantly associated with the occurrence of stress (OR 1.82 (95% CI: 1.26 to 2.62), p<0.001).
Academic performance
Four different measures of academic performance were used in our study: disruption of concentration, activities, absenteeism and cum laude GPA. Primary dysmenorrhoea occurrence and severity were found to have significant associations (table 2) with three of the variables—disruption of concentration, activities and absenteeism—with the exception of cum laude GPA (p values 0.941 and 0.606, respectively). These associations were also found even after adjusting for confounders (table 3).
Discussion
Our study found evidence that primary dysmenorrhoea is associated with disturbance in the quality of life, mental health and academic performance of medical students. Quality of life was significantly associated with both the presence and severity of primary dysmenorrhoea. Since pain is a disturbing event that causes numerous distractions in daily activities, quality of life impairment is expected. Quality of life comprises several aspects (physical, psychological, social, etc.) and is assessed differently across studies, either qualitatively21 or quantitatively, as in our study. We used the Quality of Life scale developed by the American Chronic Pain Association,17 due to its simplicity (a maximum score of 10 without segmentation into several domains) and its prior use in a similar study in Indonesia,16 while other studies used more complex scoring systems, such as the WHO QoL scale (four domains) or the EuroQoL-5D (five domains), both with a maximum score of 100. Nonetheless, our study corresponds to prior findings which use different scores. For example, a study in Japan showed significantly lower quality of life (WHO QoL) with more severe dysmenorrhoea.22 Meanwhile, a study of the Spanish population revealed a slightly different trend where, although the overall quality of life (EuroQoL-5D) was significantly lower in women with dysmenorrhoea, no differences across degrees of dysmenorrhoea severity were observed (overall and within the five domains).23 These previous studies revealed that not all aspects of quality of life are impaired similarly by dysmenorrhoea. Furthermore, cultural background and subjective perceptions of pain play essential roles in determining the degree of quality-of-life impairment.8
In terms of mental health, our study revealed that increasing primary dysmenorrhoea severity is associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms. This finding aligns with the results of a Saudi Arabian study that examined the association between dysmenorrhoea and depressive symptoms among female university students.24 The study reported a significant positive correlation between quantified dysmenorrhoea severity scores (the WaLIDD score) and Patient Health Questionnaire scores, a depression screening scale.24 A 2021 meta-analysis of 10 studies incorporating 4691 participants with primary dysmenorrhoea also reported similar significant results.9 Our study also found that stress levels, another critical aspect of mental health, were positively associated with primary dysmenorrhoea severity. Maryam et al reported that severe menstrual cramps were significantly associated with moderate-to-severe psychological stress among fourth-year medical students.25 Similarly, a multiple regression analysis conducted in Tokyo revealed a significant relationship between dysmenorrhoea severity and psychological distress.26 In addition, Wang et al demonstrated that women with higher perceived stress had an increased risk of dysmenorrhoea compared with those with lower perceived stress in the preceding menstrual cycle.27
The aetiology of the association between primary dysmenorrhoea and mental health issues is not yet fully established, but several mechanisms have been proposed. Chronic and recurrent menstrual pain, as with other chronic pain conditions, acts as a persistent stressor that exacerbates depressive symptoms and stress levels.9 28 Furthermore, hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle may also play a role. Primary dysmenorrhoea is associated with the production of uterine prostaglandins, which are influenced by both oestrogen and progesterone. Both hormones have been implicated in depressive symptomatology through their effects on serotonin pathways and neurotransmitter regulation.24 29 Pro-inflammatory cytokines during menstruation may also contribute to serotonin deficits and depressive symptoms.9 Finally, social and academic disruptions, such as absenteeism and decreased productivity, could add to the stress and raise the risk for depression.30
Academic performance is another aspect of daily life that is significantly associated with primary dysmenorrhoea. This finding should raise concerns, as class performance may affect grades. Medicine is a stressful and competitive field and losing top positions or receiving lower grades due to disruptive pain can increase stress levels, thus exacerbating the previously discussed associations between primary dysmenorrhoea, mental health and quality of life.31 Students’ concentration was found to be more disrupted among those with primary dysmenorrhoea, especially with moderate-to-severe pain. Our finding is consistent with results from a systematic review involving 83 studies with more than 36 000 participants, which showed that at least 44.2% of participants experienced impaired concentration.32 A previous meta-analysis involving 21 000 participants reported a slightly lower percentage of impaired concentration (40.9%).3 Concentration in class is also related to active participation during classes. While many factors contribute to concentration during classes, whether external (lecturer or environmental aspects) or internal (students’ conditions), there is a lack of studies specifically addressing menstrual pain in female students.12 33 Compared with the significantly higher odds of reduced concentration found in our study, a study in Riyadh found much lower odds.34
Students with primary dysmenorrhoea were also found to experience more disruptions in their school-related activities. This finding is in accordance with a 2005 study that determined 98.6% of women with severe menstrual pain were unable to attend social activities.35 Later studies also found that higher pain severity is associated with impaired social relationships.34 A study in Ethiopia found that 31.7% of college students with primary dysmenorrhoea experienced limitations in going out with friends.13 Besides social activities, physical activities were also found to be impaired by primary dysmenorrhoea, according to previous studies. Physical activity and primary dysmenorrhoea are interrelated and complexly influence one another. A study at a university in Iran showed a 1% reduction in the incidence of primary dysmenorrhoea per unit increase in physical activity score.36 Similarly, another study among Ethiopian college students reported that 37.8% experienced limitations in sports participation due to primary dysmenorrhoea.13
Another factor that is highly influenced by primary dysmenorrhoea is absenteeism from university classes. Our study found that 99.11% of Indonesian medical students with primary dysmenorrhoea needed to take at least one day off from medical school because of their condition. This is the highest number of absenteeism compared with previous studies, which was estimated to be 20.1%, as compiled in a meta-analysis by Armour et al.3 There are three possible explanations for this phenomenon. First, differences in the questions asked might lead to different results. A Swedish study showed that absenteeism, when considered to be at least 1 day off in life, affects more people (59%) compared with absenteeism, when considered to be a monthly disturbance (14%).4 As our question was framed in the former way, this might explain the significantly higher result. Second, our population of medical students might experience different types of stress than other populations. Other studies conducted on medical students in Saudi Arabia10 (28.3%) and Nepal11 (29.45%) also show a higher percentage of absenteeism compared with the average of 20.1%, albeit lower than ours. Finally, Armour et al found that low- and middle-income countries, such as Indonesia, have a higher percentage of absenteeism (26%) compared with high-income countries (12.1%). Women in low- and middle-income countries might lack necessary access to or knowledge of sanitary products and treatments during menstruation, which can affect their morbidity and increase absenteeism.3
GPA is the only marker of academic performance that was found not to be associated with the presence or severity of dysmenorrhoea. We used GPA as a proxy for academic performance, similar to the approach of Tadese et al, who also found a similar result. However, we used a specific cut-off of 3.50/4.00 GPA to check for cum laude status, whereas Tadese et al used a continuous value of GPA. Tadese et al found a lower GPA in students who experienced dysmenorrhoea, without specifying primary or secondary dysmenorrhoea.37 Our contrasting findings may be explained by the reality that the association between dysmenorrhoea, both primary or secondary and GPA might be dynamic where GPA is a cumulative value affected by various variables. It should also be noted that there is a higher prevalence of primary dysmenorrhoea in our setting. Moreover, other studies that found significant associations between academic performance and primary dysmenorrhoea defined academic performance in terms of class absenteeism, reduced concentration and focus, falling asleep during lectures, reduced physical activities or incomplete homework submissions.3
Limitations and future directions
While this study is the first to investigate dysmenorrhoea and its associations with disruptions in the daily life of female medical students in Indonesia, it has some inherent limitations. The cross-sectional design restricts our capacity to determine causal effects of primary dysmenorrhoea on disturbances in various areas of life. Furthermore, although the sample size was large, we did not employ a randomised sampling technique. Instead, we used snowball sampling, which led to a higher concentration of participants from Java. However, this distribution remains representative of the spread of Indonesian medical schools (45 out of 89 schools are in Java). Our focus on medical students, who generally possess a higher baseline understanding and interest in the subject, also necessitates caution when generalising the findings to the broader Indonesian population.
This study was conducted in 2021, prior to the adoption of the updated FIGO criteria for normal menstrual cycle length (24–38 days). At the time, the questionnaire used the previously accepted range of 21 to 35 days.38 While this does not affect the study’s primary outcomes, it may influence comparability with future studies using the updated criteria. Furthermore, the use of self-reported questionnaires limits the ability to definitively classify respondents with primary or secondary dysmenorrhoea, as further diagnostic methods are required to identify underlying diseases. Many similar studies do not attempt this differentiation, which may make comparisons with their findings more complex. While we excluded participants with previously diagnosed pelvic pathology, it is important to consider that some individuals reporting persistent or severe dysmenorrhoea, even when classified as ‘primary,’ may harbour previously undiagnosed secondary conditions such as endometriosis. This is particularly relevant because primary dysmenorrhoea is generally expected to improve by the early 20s.6 Thus, its persistence among this age group shows the need for greater awareness and thorough evaluation to ensure early diagnosis of potential secondary causes.
Despite these limitations, this study is crucial in raising awareness about primary dysmenorrhoea and its associations with disruptions in daily life. As the first nationwide prevalence study on primary dysmenorrhoea among Indonesian medical students, it highlights a significant gynaecological issue and its considerable burden on this demographic. We recommend further health education initiatives to improve awareness of menstrual health and mitigate its potential impacts. Future research should also investigate the prevalence of undiagnosed secondary dysmenorrhoea within populations reporting primary dysmenorrhoea. Longitudinal studies using more accurate diagnostic measurements could thus provide a clearer understanding of the overlap between these conditions and provide a more comprehensive understanding of dysmenorrhoea in Indonesia. Finally, further studies are also needed to better elucidate the impact of primary dysmenorrhoea among wider populations across the country.
Conclusion
Our study highlights the significant associations of primary dysmenorrhoea with quality of life, mental health and academic performance of Indonesian medical students. Despite inherent limitations, such as the cross-sectional design, non-randomised sampling and reliance on self-reported data, our findings show the burden of primary dysmenorrhoea and the need for increased awareness and future research on the topic. By addressing the problem, we can better support medical students and improve their overall well-being and academic outcomes.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available on reasonable request. The original raw data analysed are available from the corresponding author and can be presented on reasonable request.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
This study involves human participants and was approved by Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia and Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital (Ref. No: 344/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2021). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
References
Footnotes
X @reynardisutanto
Contributors HS, RLS, KT and RR contributed to the article. HS conceived the proposal, designed the cross-sectional survey, interpret the analyses and prepared the manuscript. RLS contributed to data collection, performed analyses, assisted with drafting the manuscript and supervised the overall steps of the study. KT contributed to data collection, performed analyses and assisted with drafting the manuscript. RR contributed to data collection and assisted with drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The guarantor of the study is HS; accepts full responsibility for the finished work and the conduct of the study, had access to the data and controlled the decision to publish.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.