You are here

Article info

Article menu
Evidence based practice
Protocol
Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews’ methods: protocol for an eDelphi study

Authors

  • Ariany M Vieira Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, CanadaMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Geneviève Szczepanik Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Chiara de Waure Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Andrea C Tricco Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Sandy Oliver University College London Institute of Education, London, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Jovana Stojanovic Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, CanadaMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Paula A B Ribeiro Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Danielle Pollock Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact, School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Elie A Akl Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • John Lavis McMaster Health Forum and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaAffiliate Scientist, Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Tanja Kuchenmuller Research for Health Department,Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Peter Bragge Monash Sustainable Development Institute Evidence Review Service, BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Laurenz Langer South Africa Centre for Evidence, Johannesburg, South Africa PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Simon Bacon Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, CanadaMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Simon Bacon; simon.bacon{at}concordia.ca
View Full Text

Citation

Vieira AM, Szczepanik G, de Waure C, et al
Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews’ methods: protocol for an eDelphi study
BMJ Open 2023;13:e069856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069856

Publication history

  • Received November 4, 2022
  • Accepted June 22, 2023
  • First published July 7, 2023.
Online issue publication 
July 07, 2023
Previous versions
Review history

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.