You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 12, Issue 5
  • Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care

Article info

Article menu
Health economics
Protocol
Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care

Authors

  • Christine Marie Bækø Halling Department of Real-World Evidence, NHTA, Copenhagen, Denmark Danish Centre for Health Economics (DaCHE), Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Department of Health, The Danish Center for Social Science Research (VIVE), Copenhagen, Denmark PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Claire Gudex Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Open Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Anders Perner Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Cathrine Elgaard Jensen Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements (DaCHE), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Dorte Gyrd-Hansen Danish Centre for Health Economics (DaCHE), Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Christine Marie Bækø Halling; cha{at}nhta.com
View Full Text

Citation

Halling CMB, Gudex C, Perner A, et al
Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care
BMJ Open 2022;12:e058500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058500

Publication history

  • Received October 19, 2021
  • Accepted May 6, 2022
  • First published May 25, 2022.
Online issue publication 
May 25, 2022
Previous versions
Review history

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.