Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Objective We examined the national prevalence as well as the individual and contextual factors associated with maternal healthcare utilisation in Mali.
Setting The study was conducted in Mali.
Participants We analysed data on 6335 women aged 15–49 years from Mali’s 2018 Demographic and Health Survey.
Outcome variable Maternal healthcare utilisation comprising antenatal care (ANC) attendant, skilled birth attendant (SBA), and postnatal care (PNC) attendant, was our outcome variable.
Results Prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation was 45.6% for ANC4+, 74.7% for SBA and 25.5% for PNC. At the individual level, ANC4 + and SBA utilisation increased with increasing maternal age, level of formal education and wealth status. Higher odds of ANC4 + was found among women who are cohabiting (adjusted OR (aOR)=2.25, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.37) and delivered by caesarean section (aOR=2.53, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.73), while women who considered getting money for treatment (aOR=0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.88) and distance to health facility (aOR=0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90) as a big problem had lower odds. Odds to use PNC was higher for those who were working (aOR=1.22, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.48) and those covered by health insurance (aOR=1.87, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.57). Lower odds of SBA use were associated with having two (aOR=0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.71), three (aOR=0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58), and four or more (aOR=0.38, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.59) children, and residing in a rural area (aOR=0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.69). Listening to the radio and watching TV were associated with increased maternal healthcare utilisation.
Conclusion The government should increase availability, affordability and accessibility to healthcare facilities by investing in health infrastructure and workforce to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.4 of reducing maternal morality to less than 70 deaths per 100 000 live births by 2030. It is important to ascertain empirically why PNC levels are astonishingly lower relative to ANC and SBA.
- maternal medicine
- public health
- health policy
- organisation of health services
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are freely available to the public on the DHS website.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Strengths and limitations of this study
The strength of the study is the use of national-level data and use of logistic regression models to analyse the associations between variables.
A major limitation of the study is the use of secondary data from the Demographic and Health Survey.
Even though we used national-level data and the results were strong enough, we did not have any control over cleaning and ensuring internal consistencies of the data.
The data relied on verbal reports from participants which could suffer from recall bias.
Introduction
More than 810 women die globally from pregnancy and childbirth-related complications every day.1 Complications during pregnancy and childbirth constitute the second leading cause of death among women.2–4 Approximately more than 94% of all daily maternal deaths occur in low-income and lower-middle-income countries.1 In 2017, nearly 196 000 women of reproductive age died during childbirth.4
The global agenda of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 (ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages) targets 3.1 and 3.2, to which all low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are major signatories, in general aims at reducing global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100 000 live births, and neonatal mortality to at least 12 per 1000 live births and under-five mortality to at least 25 per 1000 live births, respectively, by 2030.5 The Maternal and Child Health Index constitutes the foremost indicator for assessing the reliance and the performance of health systems of every country.6 Nevertheless, maternal and neonatal mortality remains a significant public health problem clogging the progress of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) towards having a stable health system and achieving SDGs.7 The WHO estimated that out of the 99% of all maternal deaths occurring in LMICs, more than half occur in SSA.8 9 The WHO also acknowledged that young women (10–14 years) face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.1
Limited financial capacity in paying for maternal health is one of the key barriers to utilisation of maternal and newborn healthcare services. The fear of paying for excessive expenses, for instance, deters or delays some women’s decision to seek care even while dealing with obstetric complications.10 Nevertheless, health insurance has been identified to limit or remove this barrier in many studies in developing countries.11–13
Mali remains among the many countries in the subregion where maternal mortality remains relatively high. Mali’s maternal mortality ratio is estimated to be as high as 562 deaths per 100 000 live births.4 14 More than 80% of these women’s deaths in Mali are preventable.15 This high maternal mortality ratio, however, comes at the backdrop of various interventions implemented by the government to ameliorate the status quo.16–19 For instance, in efforts to improve access to maternal healthcare service, Mali, on 1 January 2005, introduced a fee exemption policy for C-sections which covered the cost of all C-sections including the surgical procedure and preoperative assessments, the surgical kit and postoperative treatment, and hospitalisation in public and private health facilities.20 21 Also, since 2019, the Malian government has initiated a series of policies to reform national healthcare, expected to fully be in effect by 2022.22 23 Among these is the removal of point-of-service fees for healthcare for vulnerable populations namely pregnant women and children under 5 years.23
Poor maternal healthcare utilisation comprising late initiation/non-attendance of antenatal care (ANC) during pregnancy, births not being assisted by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) and poor postnatal care (PNC) are identified as major factors resulting in high maternal deaths.16 19 24 25 Skilled health service care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and their newborns.1
The ambitious SDG agenda may not be achieved in many SSA countries including Mali 5 if the utilisation of maternal healthcare components such as ANC, SBA and PNC is not accelerated.26 There is, however, a paucity of empirical literature on the state of maternal healthcare utilisation (ANC, SBA and PNC) at the national level in the country. Such data are needed for the acceleration of interventions to improve utilisation, reduce maternal mortality and accelerate progress towards achievement of the SDGs. Our study, therefore, examined the prevalence as well as the individual and contextual factors associated with maternal healthcare utilisation in Mali using the most recent (2018) and nationally representative Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data. The findings from this study could serve as the scientific basis on which policy makers and programme planners base interventions seeking to promote maternal healthcare utilisation towards reducing maternal mortality in Mali.
Methods
Data source and study design
We analysed a cross-sectional data from the 2018 DHS of Mali. The DHS is a nationally representative and comparative survey conducted in over 85 LMICs worldwide.27 A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from the respondents on health indicators such as maternal healthcare utilisation.27 The respondents were sampled using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. Detailed sampling technique has been highlighted in a study by Aliaga and Ruilin.28 In the present study, a total of 6335 women of reproductive age (15–49 years) were included in the analysis. The data set is freely available for download on the DHS platform.29 In drafting this manuscript, we relied on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement guidelines.30
Study setting
Mali is a West-African country with a population of 20 548 743.31 It has a pyramidal healthcare system, the community health system, requiring entry into the health system from community health centres.32 This decentralised system operates at five levels, namely national, regional, district, health area and community.32 The major healthcare financing mechanism is out-of-pocket payments for services including maternal healthcare services. Existing insecurities and internal displacement of people have also exacerbated inequalities in health infrastructure and access.33
Patient and public involvement
No patients were involved in this study as we used secondary data.
Variables
Outcome variables
ANC, SBA and PNC were the outcome variables in this study. To assess ANC, the respondents were asked about the number of antenatal visits they made during their recent pregnancy. The response options recoded into 0–3=0 (<4 ANC attendance) and ≥4=1 (≥4 ANC attendance). With SBA, the respondents were asked ‘Who assisted (NAME) during delivery?’. Those whose response options included any category of health professionals were classified as ‘having SBA’ while those who were assisted by traditional birth attendants and others were grouped as ‘not having SBA’. PNC on the other hand was assessed using the question, ‘Did (NAME) go for postnatal checks within 2 months?’. The response options were 0=no; 1=yes; and 8=don’t know. Those whose response option was ‘don’t know’ were dropped. We, therefore, used the dichotomised responses in the final analysis. The coding and classification were informed by literature that used the DHS data sets.34–37
Explanatory variables
We considered 17 explanatory variables in this study. These variables were selected based on their availability in the DHS data sets as well as their significant association with the outcome variables in the study.34 38 39 The variables were ground into individual level (age of the respondent, educational level, marital status, religion, current working status, parity, national health insurance coverage, delivery by caesarean section, frequency of listening to radio, frequency of watching television, frequency of reading newspaper or magazine, getting medical help for self: permission to go; getting medical help for self: distance to health facility, and getting medical help for self: getting money for treatment) and contextual level (wealth index, place of residence and region). We maintained the existing coding in the DHS data set for current working status, national health insurance, delivery by caesarean section, frequency of listening to radio, frequency of watching television, frequency of reading newspaper/magazine, getting medical help for self: permission to go; getting medical help for self: distance to health facility, and getting medical help for self: getting money for treatment, wealth index, place of residence and region. The age of the respondent was recoded into ‘15–19’, ‘20–24’, ’25–29’, ’30–34’ and ‘35 and above’. The level of education of the respondent was recoded into ‘no education’, ‘primary’ and ‘secondary or higher’. Marital status was coded as ‘never married’, ‘married’, ‘cohabiting’ and ‘widowed or divorced or separated’. Religious affiliation was coded as ‘Christianity’, ‘Islamic’, ‘African Traditional or no religion or others’. Parity was coded as ‘one birth’, ‘two births’, ‘three births’ and ‘four or more births’.
Statistical analyses
Stata software V.16.0 was used to perform the statistical analysis. All the analyses were weighted. We used percentages to summarise the prevalence of ANC, SBA and PNC as shown in figure 1. Later, cross-tabulation and χ2 tests were performed to examine the distribution of the outcome variables across the explanatory variables. Corresponding p values from the χ2 test were used to determine the statistically significant association between the outcome variables and the explanatory variables. All the variables that showed significance were placed in the regression model. We built four models under multilevel regression analysis to examine the association between each of the outcome variables and the explanatory variables. The first model (Model O) was fitted to show the variance in the outcome variables attributed to the clustering of the primary sampling units and the explanatory variables. Model I was fitted to include the individual-level variables against each of the outcome variables. Model II contained the contextual-level variables. Model III was fitted to include all the explanatory variables against each of the outcome variables. We used Akaike’s Information Criterion to test for model fitness and model comparison. The result of the regression analysis was presented using adjusted ORs (aORs) with their 95% CIs. We applied the women’s sample weights (v005/1000 000) to obtain unbiased estimates, according to the DHS guidelines and the Stata survey command ‘svy’ was used to adjust for the complex sampling structure of the data in all the analyses.
Prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation among women in Mali. ANC, antenatal care; PNC, postnatal care; SBA, skilled birth attendant.
Ethical considerations
Since our analysis was based on publicly available data, no further ethical permission was necessary. Ethical guidelines regarding the usage of secondary data for publication were adhered to. Further information about DHS data usage and ethical standards are available at http://googl/ny8T6X.
Results
Prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation among women in Mali
Results from the descriptive analysis in figure 1 show that the prevalence of various maternal healthcare components among women in Mali were 45.6% (95% CI 44.4% to 46.8%) for ANC, 74.7% (95% CI 73.6% to 75.8%) for SBA and 25.5% (95% CI 24.4% to 26.6%) for PNC.
Bivariable relationship between maternal healthcare utilisation and the explanatory variables
Table 1 presents bivariable analyses of predictors of ANC, SBA and PNC among women in Mali. We found that educational level, ownership of health insurance, delivery by caesarean section, exposure to mass media, wealth, place of residence and region of women were significantly related to ANC, SBA and PNC utilisation. Parity and getting medical help for self (permission to go, getting money for treatment and distance to the health facility) were significantly related to ANC and SBA utilisation among women. Religion was significantly related to ANC and PNC. Marital status and maternal current working status were only significantly related to SBA and PNC utilisation, respectively.
Bivariate analysis of predictors of ANC, SBA and PNC among women in Mali (n=6335)
Multilevel logistic regression analyses on the individual and contextual factors associated maternal healthcare utilisation among women in Mali
Online supplemental table 1 presents the mixed-effect analysis of predictors of ANC4 + (having four or more ANC visits) among women in Mali. We found that ANC4 + utilisation increased with increasing maternal age, level of formal education, parity and wealth status. Women aged 30–34 years (aOR=1.63, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.69) and those aged 35+ years (aOR=1.78, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.43) had higher odds of using ANC4 + compared with those aged 15–19 years. Also, women with primary education and those with secondary or higher level of formal education were, for instance, 1.37 times (95% CI 1.1.12 to 1.69) and 1.86 times (95% CI 1.48 to 2.33), respectively, more likely to use ANC4 + than those with no formal education. Women who were cohabiting had 2.25 (95% CI 1.16 to 4.37) higher odds of using ANC4 + than those who were never married. Those who had four or more children had lower odds of using ANC4+ (aOR=0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.00) than those who were primiparous, and women in the richer and richest wealth quintile were 1.63 times (95% CI 1.23 to 2.16) and 2.3 times (95% CI 1.57 to 3.35), respectively, more likely to use ANC4 + than the poorest women. Women who were delivered by caesarean section (aOR=2.53, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.73) were more likely to use ANC4 + than those who did not deliver by caesarean section. Respondents who were exposed to newspaper/magazine less than once a week (aOR=1.49, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.21), radio (aOR=1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48) and television (aOR=1.37, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.68) also had higher odds of using ANC4 + than those who were not exposed. With regard to getting medical help for self, women who considered getting money for treatment (aOR=0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.88) and the distance to health facility (aOR=0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90) as a big problem were less likely to use ANC4 +, respectively. Concerning region of residence, women in Sikasso (aOR=0.58, 95% CI 0.42,0.81), Toumbouctou (aOR=0.61, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.99) and Kidal (aOR=0.10, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.22) were less likely to use ANC4 + than those in Kayes. However, women in Bamako (aOR=1.56, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.35) had higher odds of using ANC4 + than those in Kayes.
Supplemental material
Online supplemental table 2 presents the mixed-effect analyses on the predictors of SBA among women in Mali. We found that SBA utilisation increased with maternal age, level of formal education and wealth status. Compared with women aged 15–19 years, those aged 25–29 years (aOR=1.73, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.64), 30–34 years (aOR=1.10.67, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.70) and 35+ years (aOR=1.95, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.08) have higher odds of using SBA. Women with primary (aOR=1.82, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.44) and secondary or higher formal (aOR=2.17, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.35) education were more likely to use SBA than those with no formal education. Women in the middle (aOR=1.33, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.70), richer (aOR=3.01, 95% CI 1.91 to 4.76), and richest (aOR=7.79, 95% CI 3.20 to 18.95) wealth quintiles had a higher probability of using SBA than the poorest women. Additionally, compared with primiparous women, those with two (aOR=0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.71), three (aOR=0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58) and four or more (aOR=0.38, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.59) children had lower odds of using SBA. The probability of using SBA declined with parity. The odds of SBA utilisation was higher for women who delivered by caesarean section (aOR=85.83, 95% CI 8.93 to 824.86) compared with those who did not. Women who watched television at least once a week were 1.43 times (95% CI 1.12 to 1.81) more likely to use SBA than those who never watched. Rural dwellers (women) also had lower odds of using SBA (aOR=0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.69) than urban women. Compared with women in Kayes region, those in Koulikoro (aOR=5.30, 95% CI 2.51 to 11.17), Sikasso (aOR=5.34, 95% CI 2.75 to 10.36) and Bamako (aOR=4.75, 95% CI 1.82 to 12.41) regions had higher odds of using SBA while those in Toumbouctou (aOR=0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.88) and Kidal (aOR=0.03, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.08) regions had lower odds of using SBA.
Online supplemental table 3 presents the mixed-effect analyses of predictors of PNC among women in Mali. We found that women who were working were 1.22 times (95% CI 1.01 to 1.48) more likely to use PNC compared with those who were not working whereas those who were covered by health insurance were more likely to use PNC (aOR=1.87, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.57) than those who were not covered. Regarding mass media exposure, we found that women who reported listening to radio less than once a week (aOR=1.42, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.82) and at least once a week (aOR=1.41, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.78) were more likely to use PNC than those who were not exposed. Again, those who watched television less than once a week (aOR=1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.80) had higher odds of using PNC than those who did not watch. We also found that women from Mopti (aOR=4.14, 95% CI 2.33 to 7.38), Kidal (aOR=2.32, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.38) and Bamako (aOR=1.98, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.40) regions had higher odds of using PNC while those from Sikasso (aOR=0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.64) had lower odds of using PNC compared women in Kayes.
Discussion
This study examined the individual and contextual factors associated with maternal healthcare utilisation in Mali using DHS data. The overall prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation was 45.6% for ANC4+, 74.7% for SBA and 25.5% for PNC which are higher than (30% ANC4 + and 38% SBA) those reported in the 2001 DHS.40 The prevalence of ANC4 + reported in this study is relatively lower than the 95.6%, 52.44%, 58.53% and 90.4% ANC4 + reported in other SSA countries.41–44 Again, the prevalence of PNC observed in this study is comparatively lower than that in studies in Ghana (74%),45 Ethiopia (51.2%)46 and the pooled prevalence in SSA (52.48%).47 The prevalence of SBA is higher than that of a previous study reporting 39.9% of SBA in Mali.48 The lower prevalence of ANC4 + reported in this study is worrying as the majority of maternal complications during delivery and deaths that occur in SSA are linked to poor utilisation of quality ANC as recommended.34 The observations regarding ANC and PNC utilisation come at the backdrop of expectation and the WHO recommendation that women should ideally attend ANC about four times (focused ANC) before delivery which is supervised by a skilled attendant, and then receive adequate PNC within 42 days after delivery.49 50 Focused ANC facilitates early detection of risk factors/potential complications and implementation of timely interventions.51 52
This observation calls for imperative measures to be implemented by the health authorities in Mali to promote and improve women’s utilisation of ANC four times before delivery. Successful maternal health programmes and interventions such as the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Maternal and Child Survival Program implemented by the government of Mali and its partners with the intent of achieving the global SDG 3.4 target considerably reducing maternal mortality to less than 70 deaths per 100 000 live births by 2030 could explain the higher prevalence of SBA observed in this study.5 48 53 54
Regarding the individual factors that influence maternal healthcare utilisation, we found in the current study that women with higher formal education have a higher probability of using maternal healthcare (ANC, SBA and PNC). This finding is consistent with the observations made by previous studies.55–57 The observation made in the study could be ascribed to the fact that educated women become more informed, conscious and knowledgeable about the importance of ANC4+, SBA and PNC for their health and that of their children.48 58–60 This implies that more education needs to be given to young girls and women, especially those from rural settings, by providing them with essential information on maternal healthcare, hence empowering them to make informed reproductive health decisions.
We realised in this study that women who are covered by national health insurance have higher odds of using at least four times ANC when pregnant, have their child delivery supervised by a SBA and then receive adequate PNC within 42 days after delivery. This finding is congruent with the findings of many previous studies which noted similar observations that health insurance use among pregnant women increases their use of ANC, skilled birth and postnatal care.61–63
The observation where health insurance coverage increases the probability of women using maternal healthcare could be explained by the fact that the possession of valid health insurance serves as a financial protection factor for women, hence relieving them of the predicament of out-of-pocket payment at the health facilities. Lack of health insurance prevents women, especially those from poor households, from seeking or accessing appropriate and adequate maternal healthcare especially during pregnancy and childbirth which is recognised as a major promoting factor of a significant proportion of the mortality in SSA.64–67 Owing to the importance of health coverage, many governments in SSA have implemented national health insurance policies as a way of increasing maternal healthcare and reducing maternal mortality.68
Individual factors revealed significant association between mass media exposure (radio, TV and newspapers) and maternal healthcare utilisation among women in Mali. We noted that women who use any form of social media as a source of information have higher likelihood of seeking maternal healthcare during pregnancy, delivery and after delivery. This outcome of our results is consistent with findings of previous studies that reported a significant association between maternal healthcare utilisation and mass media.69–72 This observation points to the importance and the crucial role mass media plays in creating health-seeking and utilisation awareness among women .73–75 In Mali, like in many SSA countries, media—especially television and radio—are used in public health education and dissemination of health policy interventions.
Parity was realised to determine maternal healthcare utilisation by women in Mali. We found that women with four or more children have a lower probability of having their subsequent child through institutional delivery or by a qualified health attendant than women who were having their first birth. This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting that parity significantly influences women’s decision to used skilled/supervised delivery.39 76–79 This may be due to the fact that women who have ever delivered in the past may have developed the self-confidence to deliver at home and may not be interested in using a health professional due to their experience and knowledge of earlier pregnancies. Also, women with many children who have used health facilities during the delivery of those children in the health facilities and are dissatisfied with the care and negative attitude experienced may not be motivated to use approved maternal healthcare again.39 76–80 The reason that could increase maternal healthcare utilisation among the primiparous women could be that they are giving birth for the first time and may lack experience from a prior delivery, and hence may be afraid, are more cautious and concerned about pregnancy complications and outcomes.39 79 81
Regarding the contextual factors influencing maternal healthcare utilisation, we realised that the wealth status of women positively influences the use of maternal healthcare in Mali; this implies that wealthier women have more chance of attending ANC during their pregnancies, deliver in a health facility and continue with PNC after delivery, than poorer women. This finding corroborates suggestions made in previous studies which also indicated that as compared with women in the poorer households, women in the middle or higher wealth quintile have higher odds of using maternal healthcare (ANC, SBA and PNC).61 82–85 This comes at the backdrop that an estimated 60% of Mali’s population live in rural areas with limited socioeconomic status and infrastructure and 49% of the population live below the national poverty line.86 Yet, majority of healthcare financing is out-of-pocket payments.87 User fee is a major barrier to healthcare access, especially for vulnerable populations like pregnant women88 and has implications for maternal health.89 The findings showed that the higher the wealth of the woman, the more likely she is to use maternal healthcare. This could be accredited to the fact that women with higher income may have the purchasing power to afford the cost and other expenses that come with consultation, purchasing of recommended medication and transportation cost to the health facility, while women with limited financial resources may have difficulties paying for the cost of healthcare.61 90
We found that the place and region of residence of women is significantly related to ANC, SBA and PNC utilisation. This implies that physical proximity to a health facility is an important factor in maternal healthcare utilisation in Mali. This finding is consistent with previous studies that also reported an association between place of residence and maternal healthcare utilisation.91–93 The finding could be explained by the fact that women residing in urban areas have physical accessibility to health facilities that are predominantly available than women in the rural setting where health facilities are scarce, hence accessibility to healthcare may be much easier for the urban dwellers than the rural dwellers, thereby increasing the probability of women in the urban settings using maternal health compared with her rural counterparts. The remote distance together with bad road networks from rural settings to the health facility alongside transportation problems could discourage rural dwellers from using maternal healthcare. In Mali, the majority of government-owned health facilities are located in the urban areas or cities and far away from rural settlements, making maternal healthcare utilisation difficult for rural residents due to the cost and time of getting to the facility.94–99 There is, thus, inequity in distribution of development and infrastructure, including in healthcare facilities. For instance, being the national capital, Bamako has access to more development and healthcare infrastructure compared with the rest of the country. Thus, it is expected that barriers such as distance to health facilities, unavailability of care and long time in getting to facilities would be limited.
A major limitation of this study is the use of the secondary data from DHS which relied on verbal reports from participants. This has the tendency of recall bias and under-reporting or over-reporting of some behaviours. Nevertheless, efforts were made during the data collection process to encourage participants to provide honest responses. Again, we did not have any control over cleaning and ensuring internal consistency in the data.
Conclusion
Maternal healthcare utilisation by women plays a momentous role in reducing maternal complications which lead to maternal mortality. However, the overall prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation among women in reproductive age in Mali was low, specifically ANC4 + and PNC. Various individual and contextual factors predict maternal service utilisation in Mali. Predominant among these is availability or proximity to a health facility, as well as ownership of healthcare insurance. Therefore, it is imperative for the government of Mali to increase the availability and accessibility to healthcare facilities across the country through improved health infrastructure and workforce strengthening to help achieve the target of SDG 3.4 of reducing maternal morality to less than 70 deaths per 100 000 live births by 2030.
Despite the important findings made in this research, the study was not able to assess other user factors such as cost and quality of care at the health facility as they are not covered in the DHS despite their importance. Further studies could also focus on complications of pregnancy and delivery using another methodology as these are also not covered by DHS.
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are freely available to the public on the DHS website.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the DHS for permission to access and use Mali’s 2018 DHS data set.
References
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Twitter @hubert_amu
Contributors LEB: Guarantor, Conception and design, interpretation of data and revision; RGA: Data acquisition and analysis and interpretation; GM: Conception and design, drafting; HA: Conception and design, interpretation of data, drafting and revision; RKD: Design, drafting and revision; FIS: Design, drafting and revision; EJK: Conception and design, and interpretation of data.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.