You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 11, Issue 7
  • Transitional care of adolescents with Multiple Osteochondromas: a convergent mixed-method study ‘Patients’, parents’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives on the transfer process’

Article Text

Article menu
XML
Health services research
Original research
Transitional care of adolescents with Multiple Osteochondromas: a convergent mixed-method study ‘Patients’, parents’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives on the transfer process’
  1. Ihsane Amajjar1,
  2. Romana Malik2,
  3. Marieke van Wier1,
  4. Rob Smeets3,4,
  5. S John Ham1
  1. 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Education, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Research School Functioning, Participation & Rehabilitation, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, CIR Revalidatie, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Ihsane Amajjar; i.amajjar{at}olvg.nl

Abstract

Objectives Multiple osteochondromas (MO) is a rare hereditary disease characterised by numerous benign bone tumours. Its chronic aspect requires a well-organised transition from paediatric care to adult care; however, little is known on organising this care specific for patients with MO. This study aims to gain insight on this topic.

Design Convergent mixed-method study.

Setting This study was conducted at the orthopaedic and paediatrics department of an MO-expertise centre in the Netherlands.

Participants 12 patients, 10 parents and 10 healthcare professionals were interviewed. An additional survey was completed by 20 young adults.

Primary and secondary outcomes The (1) themes on transition, identified through template analysis and (2) transfer experience and satisfaction assessed by an 18-item On Your Own Feet-Transfer Experience Scale (OYOF-TES, range: 18–90) and by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, range: 1–10).

Results The following three key themes were identified in the qualitative analysis: (1) patient and parent in the lead can be encouraged by self-management tools, (2) successful transfers need interprofessional collaboration and communication and (3) how can we prepare patients for the transitional process? Stakeholders’ insights to improve transition were listed and divided into these three themes.

Several important aspects were underlined, particularly within the first theme; speaking-up was difficult for patients especially when parents were not directly involved. Moreover, the high psychological impact of the disease requires coaching of self-management and psychological counselling to facilitate stakeholders in their changing roles.

Twenty patients completed the quantitative survey. Mean satisfaction score with the transfer process was poor, which was assessed with the NRS (mean=5.7±2.1; range: 1–9) and the OYOF-TES (mean=56.3±14.2; range: 32–85). The OYOF-TES only showed a negative correlation (R2=0.25; p=0.026) with the number of surgical interventions in the past.

Conclusion Overall, the transfer process was found unsatisfactory. Improvement can be achieved by supporting and guiding the patients to be in the lead of their care. Moreover, preparation for transfer and a multidisciplinary approach may enhance successful transition.

  • qualitative research
  • paediatric orthopaedics
  • quality in health care
  • adult orthopaedics
  • bone diseases
  • organisation of health services

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi-org.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049418

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate transitional care of patients with multiple osteochondromas.

    • This study provides a broad range of perspectives from different stakeholders in different settings.

    • The convergent parallel mixed-method design provided us with different but complementary data on the same topic, and allowed us to bypass any social desirability bias from semi-structured interviews.

    • This study is first limited by a small number of survey respondents due to the rare aspect of the disease.

    • Second, not all patients could be reached, therefore, it is not known whether they have dropped out of care or whether these patients experienced no problems during transition. Therefore, selection bias cannot be excluded.

    Introduction

    Transitional care is ‘the purposeful, planned movement of adolescents and young adults with chronic physical and medical conditions from child-centred to adult-oriented healthcare systems’.1 Several studies have shown that adolescents (ADs) with chronic disease are potentially vulnerable when transitioning to adult care, and that inadequate guidance of the transition process is associated with deterioration in health of ADs with chronic diseases.2–9 Research to date has not yet explored effective transitional care services for ADs and young adults (YAs) with multiple osteochondromas (MO).

    MO is a rare autosomal dominant inherited skeletal disorder with an incidence of approximately 1:50 000 in the general population.10 MO is characterised by the presence of numerous benign bone tumours, osteochondromas, that develop at the metaphysis of long bones. Surgical removal of symptomatic osteochondromas and limb reconstruction procedures in children and adults with MO is necessary in 66%–74% of the entire population.10–12 Goud et al11 reported that 48% of children with MO already underwent one or more surgical procedures.

    ADs with chronic diseases such as MO face a lot of challenges; they do not only have to deal with becoming an adult and with their disease, they also have to cope with transferring from paediatric care to adult care. If the transitional care is well managed, this could be an opportunity to influence and promote healthy behaviour during this specific period as well as later in life.13 14 If not, patients could withdraw from healthcare, which could have major consequences. More specific, ADs and YAs with MO are at risk of developing severe growth disorders (80%),11 nerve compressions, impairment of joint function and development of chondrosarcomas (3%–6%).15–18 Malignant degeneration of osteochondroma to chondrosarcoma in MO usually occurs at a relatively early age, with a peak incidence between 20 and 40 years. If these patients consult their physician regularly, the risk of pour outcome can be reduced.

    In the transitional literature, an extensive amount of studies reported on specific patient groups such as ADs with rheumatic musculoskeletal disease (RMD) or childhood cancer survivors.19–21 Although patients with MO might have certain disease-related problems in common with these group of patients, there are also specific MO-related problems and complications that could affect the study outcome. Important factors in this are the life-long risk of malignant degeneration in MO, the multiple surgical procedures that are often necessary throughout life and the fact that in most cases, one parent has the same disease. Therefore, the current literature on other chronic disease should not be extrapolated to this patient group without any further research.

    This study aims to elicit patients’, parents’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on the transfer to adult care to understand perceived barriers and facilitators, and to make recommendations for future transition pathways.

    Methods

    Setting

    This study was conducted at the orthopaedic and paediatrics department of an expertise centre for MO in the Netherlands. In this centre, consultations at the orthopaedic outpatient clinic, for both paediatric and adult patients take place at one location of the hospital. Clinical admissions and surgical procedures for children are carried out at the same location, adult patients, however, are referred for this to the other location. Patients transfer from the paediatric to the adult care services at the age of 18 years. The care of adult and paediatric patients is provided by the same orthopaedic surgeons, who are specialised in paediatric and adult orthopaedic surgery with a focus on MO. They are the only stable factor during and after the transfer to the adult orthopaedic ward. The outpatient care location does not change after transfer.

    Study design

    A parallel convergent mixed-method study was used combining a qualitative design with a cross-sectional quantitative design.22–24 The main focus relied on the qualitative data, which was designed to capture in-depth perspectives of stakeholders. The quantitative part was conducted to verify the qualitative findings without interpretive bias. Key findings from both methods were integrated in the discussion section. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the following stakeholders: ADs with MO (16–18 years), YAs with MO (18–25 years), parents and healthcare professionals (table 1). The ADs were yet to transfer to the adult care services. The YAs already transferred to the adult care services and were asked to fill out the validated On Your Own Feet-Transfer Experiences Scale (OYOF-TES) questionnaire.25 This questionnaire assesses transfer experience from paediatric care to adult care and consists of 18 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The computed score ranges from 18 to 90, with 90 being the highest possible satisfaction score. A specific cut-off point is not defined. In addition, a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 1 to 10 (1=completely unsatisfied and 10=completely satisfied) was used to find out how satisfied patients were with the overall process of transfer.25 Furthermore, demographics and clinical data were obtained, such as the number of hospital visits, surgeries and age at diagnosis (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Characteristics of patients, parents and health professionals taking part in the semi-structured interviews

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Characteristics of survey respondents

    Sampling and recruitment

    Patients aged 16–25 years who had been admitted to the paediatric orthopaedic ward for MO-related surgical procedures were recruited from the hospital database and the national patient association. A total of 75 patients (39 ADs and 36 YAs) met the inclusion criteria, of which 6 ADs and 6 YAs were randomly selected for the interviews. Ten of the parents of these patients agreed to participate in the interview, two declined due to lack of time. Seven of the participating parents were diagnosed with MO themselves. The following 10 healthcare professionals from both departments were selected using purposeful sampling and all participated: paediatric nurses (n=3), pedagogical workers (n=2), psychologist (n=1), orthopaedic nurses (n=3) and physician (n=1) (table 1). For the survey, 20 of the 36 eligible YAs participated.

    Data collection

    All semi-structured interviews were audiotaped and carried out by the first author. Patients and their parents could choose to be interviewed at the outpatient clinic or at home, and were interviewed separately with the exception of one YA who preferred to have their parent present. Healthcare professionals were interviewed at their working place. Mean duration of the interviews was 30 min (range, 20–64 min). The interview guide was based on the available literature and clinical experience of the research group (online supplemental appendix 1). Questions were mainly open-ended because of the exploratory goal of the interview. The questions addressed the expectations and experiences of transfer and the overall satisfaction of care.

    The quantitative data were collected through a web-based survey.

    Analysis

    The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a template analysis technique.26 The available literature on transitional processes in other chronic diseases was used to form a priori themes (online supplemental appendix 2).27–29 The first author coded the first three interviews with the a priori themes using a qualitative data analysis software programme (MAX.QDA 2007). The second author coded these three interviews separately and subsequently the two authors compared these coded fragments to verify the themes. Potential newly emerged themes and discrepancies between the two authors were discussed and this resulted in the final draft of the template. All interviews were analysed by the first author with the final template.

    The quantitative data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows V.22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were performed to describe the study sample and to present the results of OYOF-TES. The 5-point Likert scale of the OYOF-TES was recoded to reflect agreement more easily (5=strongly agree and 4=agree). Bivariate correlations (Pearson’s r or Spearman’s r) between the OYOF-TES and other variables were calculated. Overall significance was set at a p value of <0.05.

    Consent

    Written and verbally recorded informed consent was obtained for all participants.

    Patient and public involvement

    The study was supported by the national patient association ‘HME-MO vereniging Nederland’. The association recruited patients through placing calls on their website and newsletters. The association also cooperated in the assessment of the burden of the study. Once the study has been published, we intend to inform participants of the results through the website of the national patient association and will send details of the results in a study newsletter suitable for a non-specialist audience.

    Results

    Qualitative data

    The following three key themes were derived from the analysis of the stakeholders’ perspectives: (1) patient and parent in the lead can be encouraged by self-management tools, (2) successful transfers need interprofessional collaboration and communication and (3) how can we prepare patients for the transitional process? Several recommendations for transition were given by the stakeholders which could be divided into the above-mentioned three key themes. The recommendations are outlined in table 3.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Stakeholders’ recommendations

    Patient and parent in the lead can be encouraged by self-management tools

    Speaking-up

    Patients and parents mentioned that over the years they became increasingly outspoken towards their healthcare professionals. They gained knowledge through experience and developed ‘rituals’ on how everything should go before and after surgery, for example, what kind of medication should be administered and what kind of sutures should be used. Some of these routines did not comply with the protocols of the orthopaedic adult ward, which sometimes caused conflicts between nurses and patients or parents.

    The nurse said it was better to leave the intravenous catheter in because I might get more pain later. And I thought well that’s my own responsibility and if that happens, you can give me another intravenous catheter. (…) I know exactly what’s necessary and that’s removing the intravenous catheter. (YA)

    Most of the time the healthcare professionals supported this outspokenness and confirmed that these patients should manage their care themselves. Most patients seemed to know what is best for them; yet, not everybody spoke up as they were not always comfortable to discuss problems. Some patients still needed a little encouragement to speak-up their mind, in particular on the adult orthopaedic ward, since parents and pedagogical workers who usually recognise the smallest discomfort, are increasingly absent on the adult ward. ADs on the paediatric ward were coached by pedagogical workers to ask questions and discuss matters they do not agree on.

    You miss a counsellor or someone you can talk to so you can say you do not like something. (…) I get the feeling it is better to say nothing so you are not a burden. When I enter the hospital, (…) I become a small child who wants to hold his parent’s hands. (YA)

    Psychological impact

    The interviewed ADs and YAs reported many anxieties which had developed during their childhood. The most common fears were fear of needles, swallowing and hospitals. Extensive psychological and sometimes even psychiatric counselling were necessary for these patients. Two YAs were traumatised during transition and underwent eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing. These two YAs felt uncomfortable and unsafe by other patients having an early onset of delirium on the orthopaedic ward.

    Patients expressed different feelings about the transfer to adult care services. Some YAs perceived it as normal, while the majority felt lonely, anxious, afraid or nervous.

    It was nerve wrecking, (…) It is a different ambience but cosy, well, very different. (…) I had to get used to it. (YA)

    Pedagogical workers and paediatric nurses mentioned that they are more experienced with these types of fears and might use a different approach than the orthopaedic nursing staff. This was recognised by patients, parents and orthopaedic nurses.

    Some parents and patients reported about the lack of psychological support and would have appreciated more attention towards themselves. Parents felt overlooked and guilty for passing on this disease to their children and felt that healthcare professionals focused more on the medical part and less on the psychosocial impact of MO.

    A psychologist or something, to learn how to deal with it, (…) all those bells and whistles attached to my child. I found that very difficult in the beginning. And still, I do struggle with it, how much I have gone through. (Parent)

    Changing roles between parents, patients and healthcare professionals

    Patients had different views on what becoming an adult means and how the responsibility should gradually shift from the parents to the YAs. This shift did not always take place as expected.

    I think parents should be supportive, not leading. (…) My mother made a lot of the decisions on her own, not much was discussed. Of course, it is also my fault I just let it happen. (YA)

    The majority of the ADs and YAs did not mind their parents remaining responsible for their healthcare. They preferred their parents to be continuously present on the orthopaedic ward because they did not feel comfortable with the orthopaedic nurses. They were reluctant to ask nurses small favours, for example, asking for a glass of water or adjusting their legs in bed. Two YAs still let their parents arrange their doctor’s appointments and accompany them to the visits; it had always been that way and they did not feel any need for change.

    Healthcare professionals emphasised that many parents tried to mediate and assisted in explaining things to their child. The experience that parents had gained from having MO themselves is something healthcare professionals viewed as very useful when addressing MO-related problems with patients. However, healthcare professionals often perceived the interaction between child and parent as being overprotective, too much involved and very controlling.

    I usually do not discuss this, the family dynamics, I know it is a bit cowardly but I do not have enough time to address it. However, I do think if there was a transition protocol it would be a good topic and a great opportunity to discuss. (Physician)

    Physicians would discuss the young patient’s health with parents first, nevertheless the roles reversed at a certain age at which patients would be addressed first. Some parents encouraged this, while other parents had difficulties trusting their child to self-manage care. One parent mentioned that she has never been able to give full responsibility to her child.

    Successful transfers need interprofessional collaboration and communication

    Collaboration

    Patients and parents observed a different approach between paediatric and orthopaedic nurses. Some of the patients underwent as much as 30 surgical procedures before transfer to the adult ward took place. During this period, the paediatric nurses got to know these patients and their parents well and developed a good understanding on how to support them. However, this information was not transferred to the adult care, which was considered a missed opportunity. Healthcare professionals of the orthopaedic ward frequently reported their desire for better training of staff on the disease MO as well as how to care for this group of patients. All involved medical professionals encouraged more collaboration between the paediatric and orthopaedic departments; they encouraged exchange of knowledge and experience, and suggested to continue the accessibility of pedagogical workers and psychologist on the orthopaedic ward after transfer.

    Communication

    Communication and its challenges were often discussed while addressing transfer. Patients and their parents implied that adult and paediatric care providers communicate differently.

    According to some patients, paediatric nurses would elaborate on what is scheduled, while the orthopaedic nurses would not inform the patient and families well enough, nor give them time to acclimatise to the new environment.

    Orthopaedic nurses are so attached to their protocols that they do not look at you as a human, but as a protocol. (Parent)

    The style of communication of paediatric professionals was described as kind, caring, comforting, yet sometimes as too childish. The orthopaedic professionals were perceived as straightforward and clear, and sometimes described as curtly, but also as more mature which was considered a welcome change. The orthopaedic healthcare providers agreed on the sometimes childish way of communicating on the paediatric services. However, they also reported that this patient population generally acts more youthful compared with their peers which was maintained by the parents, consequently leading to a childish way of communicating. A gradual transition process based on the development of the child was suggested.

    How can we prepare patients for the transitional process?

    Expectations of transferring to adult care

    A frequently mentioned concern was that patients expected to receive less attention from nurses on the orthopaedic adult ward compared with the nurses on the paediatric ward. Another concern was the absence of parents by their bedside. Both parents and patients feared that the nurses of the orthopaedic ward would not arrive in time when they needed help, or that they would be forgotten.

    Once, I had to wait for one hour at the paediatric ward after I called for assistance. Yes, and that frightens me of the orthopaedic adult ward. Nor my mother nor my father will be there to see whether the nurses are coming, then you are lying in a bed and can’t do anything about it. (AD)

    Children of parents who expected the transfer to be a challenging and potentially traumatising period, perceived it in the same way as their parents. Conversely, two ADs who had not transferred yet perceived the transfer as being something normal, as did their parents.

    Preparation for transition

    All stakeholders stated a lack of guidance and preparation for transfer. All nurses indicated the need for a protocol to facilitate transition. Some paediatric nurses tried to inform patients and parents about the scheduled transfer; some nurses tried to coach these ADs to be more independent and addressed the patient more than their parents during this transition period. However, these paediatric nurses also knew that this was not common practice among their colleagues.

    Terms like ‘abrupt’, ‘sudden’, ‘lack of guidance/information’ were frequently used by parents and patients during the interviews to describe the transfer from the paediatric care to adult care.

    Personally, I think it is very sudden. Like yes, you are eighteen, you are officially an adult, but it is really too fast, like from suddenly seventeen and click you’re eighteen, adult and now you should be able to do everything. (YA)

    Good preparation is of key importance according to the stakeholders. To the YAs, this meant the possibility to visit the adult ward once or twice before transfer took place as well as receiving information about the adult ward, such as the ‘house rules’. YAs who visited the orthopaedic ward prior to transfer expressed that they were less anxious afterwards. The main difference between adult care and paediatric care services and also the most important bottleneck, is that parents will not be around as much as they used to. After being guided by their parents for years, the patients are supposed to have become independent at once, which was experienced as challenging. It was also challenging for parents to let their children go. Some ADs were thinking about gradually making steps towards independence by sleeping without their parents while being admitted on the paediatric ward. In addition, they expected to benefit from an interprofessional team that is able to provide guidance regarding the transition.

    A counsellor or special team who prepares you for the transfer, a conversation for both, parents and children. And maybe, it could be useful to have separate conversations for the patients, without their parents, because that might also help, so you won’t be suppressed by your parents. (YA)

    Timing of transfer

    The age limit for the paediatric care had been discussed with all stakeholders. The ADs had different opinions on what the optimal age for transferring would be. Half of the group would not change the age limit of 18 years old: ‘once you have reached the age of 18 years you should get the same service as any other adult’. The other half of the group would prefer to extend the age limit to 20–23 years. Two of these patients would rather withdraw from healthcare services than transferring when becoming 18 years of age.

    This would be a reason why I would rather delay my surgery. Even if the surgery would be necessary. (AD)

    The parents of the ADs, who had not transferred yet, seemed to have similar opinions as their children. The group of YAs was also divided on what would be the best age to make the transfer. Half of the YAs was not ready for transfer and therefore recommended to extend the age limit to 21–23 years of age, which was also the opinion of their parents. Furthermore, the timing of transfer should not be defined by age solely but by developed skills of the patient. Most of the healthcare professionals agreed on this matter; however, they also expressed that there should still be an age limit. If patients were not capable of taking care of themselves or if they were not ready to transfer, additional support should be provided. The majority of healthcare professionals would stick to the age limit of 18 years except for one paediatric psychologist who would raise the age limit to 23 years, since the mental healthcare system generally uses this age to distinguish between ADs and adults.

    Familiar to unknown ward culture

    Parents and their children were very concerned about the prospect of turning 18 years old and therefore being admitted to the other location of the hospital. They had familiarised themselves with the paediatric ward and sometimes even defined it as their second home, as the services were adjusted to all their needs and they doubted that it would be the same for the adult care services. This was particularly mentioned for the fact that parents’ visits were restricted to official visiting hours and the lack of facilities to stay and relax as well.

    It is a totally different building, so totally unknown, so that is a big shock. You do not know what to expect, what kind of ambiance, because here you know everything, you know the nurses and doctors and that is different for the other building where other people work with a different mindset perhaps. (YA)

    The views of the patients on the two different locations of the hospital mainly focused on material surroundings. The paediatric ward was described as colourful, with beautiful rooms which you did not have to share and filled with luxurious amenities like games, well-functioning internet, the newest television sets and modern hospital beds. These amenities were lacking at the adult ward. The patients would often be admitted in quadruple rooms and therefore felt they had less privacy. They felt less comfortable and even awkward to be admitted with elderly patients in one room. Although not having met the staff members of the adult care services before transfer, the contact afterwards was described as understanding and caring. With regard to the quality of care provided by the adult and paediatric healthcare professionals, not much difference was experienced.

    Quantitative data

    Twenty patients completed the survey. Three patients declined to fill out the survey due to lack of time. Figure 1 illustrates the participant flow and table 2 outlines the characteristics of the respondents.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Study sample and response.

    The mean score of the OYOF-TES was 56.3 (SD 14.2; range: 32–85). The most appreciated items were: ‘I can manage well on my own during hospital consultations, also without my parents’ (85% agreed), ‘I am happy with the care I receive in the adult care setting’ (85% agreed). The least appreciated items were: ‘I had a say in the timing of the transfer’ (5% agreed), ‘Before the transfer, I had already met my new healthcare providers’ (15% agreed), ‘There was good collaboration between paediatric and adult care’ (25% agreed). The transfer to adult care was prepared well according to only 30% of the patients. Online supplemental appendix 3 lists all OYOF-TES items, mean values and percentage of agreement.

    The mean satisfaction score for the transfer process assessed by the NRS was 5.7 (SD 2.1; range: 1–9) and 65% of the patients scored ≥6. The association between OYOF-TES score and patients’ characteristics such as admissions rate, total amount of surgery and clinic visits, only showed a negative correlation (R2=0.25; p=0.026) between the OYOF-TES and the number of surgical interventions in the past.

    Discussion

    This mixed-methods study explored stakeholders’ perspectives on the transfer from adolescent to adult care for patients with MO. Several bottlenecks and recommendations have been identified for this transitional process. The majority of the quantitative data confirmed the qualitative data and revealed that the overall transfer process was unsatisfactory. Three key themes emerged from the qualitative data collected. Although all themes were consistent with the literature on organising transitional care for other chronic diseases, the theme ‘patient and parent in the lead’ is slightly different as in MO there often seems to be a more complex relationship between parent and child due to the autosomal dominant inheritance of the disorder, potentially resulting in a parent feeling guilty about transferring MO to his/her child.

    Unlike in other chronic diseases (eg, cystic fibrosis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, sickle cell disease and type 1 diabetes), almost 90% of the patients has a parent that suffers from MO themselves.10 Consequently, these parents already have a certain expertise, experience and leadership of their child’s care process. This can have both advantages and disadvantages. The majority of parents and patients with MO had little difficulty speaking-up regarding their care. However, some patients felt burdened to ask for help and therefore were too afraid to speak-up without the help of their parents or a pedagogical worker. In the transition literature, the concerns of ADs about becoming independent are often addressed but the fear of speaking-up has not been mentioned. Although only a few patients had difficulty speaking up, attention is warranted as this is an important aspect of self-management.

    The development of self-management skills necessary for transition is not facilitated in daily practice,30 which was confirmed by the healthcare professionals in our study. The group comprising of patients with MO needs more support and guidance in developing self-management skills. About 85% of the survey respondents reported they could manage well on their own during hospital consultations without parents, however, in the interviews one-third of YAs mentioned difficulties with self-management once transferred; they were used to their parents managing their care and did not feel the need to be in the lead themselves. At the same time, this behaviour seemed to be stimulated by the parents as they did not expect their child to be capable of managing his own care. This finding is consistent with the literature on transitional care of patients with other chronic diseases.18 29 31 32 The lack of responsibility and the difficulty to detach from parents has been reported in several studies.27 29 33 Nevertheless, in MO, the experience of the parent with the disease himself/herself, might have a high impact on the self-management skills of the patient. More research is necessary to investigate this potentially complicating factor.

    In contrast with previous findings in the literature, the majority of our patients did not perceive transferring as something normal.27 29 34 The transition of adolescence to adulthood is already a challenging period.35 Little to no attention has been payed to the psychological impact of transition in healthcare of these vulnerable youngsters with MO. One-third of YAs had suffered from a traumatising experience during transfer and needed psychiatric or psychological counselling, which was striking since such extreme experiences have not yet been reported in the transition literature. It would be of further interest to investigate which patient and disease characteristics in this specific patient group makes them more susceptible for such psychological distress. It seems that transfer might be a tipping point for these vulnerable patients who are already dealing with many changes. In our study population, several fears already existed at childhood, but the most traumatic experiences occurred during admissions on the adult orthopaedic ward. Within our study design, we have not investigated this phenomenon further and merely identified it. Future research with a larger population should focus on this psychological impact of transfer to confirm that this is an issue and to create awareness to provide proper counselling.

    In this study, patients and parents had similar views on transfer, whereas in several other studies, ADs with other chronic diseases were less satisfied and more critical about the adult care setting than their parents.33 36–38 A possible explanation for this could be that the majority of our patients had a parent suffering from MO as well, and hence might have similar perceptions.

    Patient satisfaction is associated with quality of delivered healthcare and can be of added value in evaluating and improving healthcare.39 Van Staa et al explored the satisfaction of transfer for a broad range of chronic diseases using the OYOF-TES and NRS (mean 61.8, SD 13.21 and 6.63, SD 1.79, respectively).25 They reported that almost 20% of the patients were unsatisfied with their transfer (NRS <6). Our study showed that 35% of the patients rated the transfer process as unsatisfactory. About 45% of respondents felt that they were ready for transfer which is less than reported by Staa et al25 (64%) and in other literature.40 41 Of the respondents in our series, 30% reported that they were well-prepared, which was consistent with the qualitative data but again less when compared with Staa et al (49%). Furthermore, Staa et al reported that the male gender perceived transfer more positively than their female counterparts, while we found no gender differences. The only association found was a negative correlation (R2=0.25; p=0.026) between the OYOF-TES and the number of surgical interventions in the past. We hypothesise that the more surgical procedures patients have had in the past, the more hospitalised they become and the more difficult it could be for them to leave the familiar surroundings of the paediatric ward. Patients reported that the paediatric ward became more of a second home the more often they were admitted there.

    The timing and preparation for transfer is an issue in most studies.27 42 43 The healthcare providers would not extend the age limit but prefer to assist patients in developing skills to prepare them for transfer. They also emphasised the need for improvement of interprofessional collaboration to make transition successful. Only 25% of the survey respondents perceived the collaboration between paediatric and adult healthcare services as good, which supports the findings from the interviews. Early and sufficient preparation, getting familiar with the adult care services prior to transfer, discussing the possible pitfalls and improving self-management of the patient could all be helpful in closing the gap of transfer.44

    The transitional care has a tri-phasic nature with the first phase being preparation, the second phase being the event of transfer and the third phase following after transfer. Previous studies on transitional care have tended to focus on the event of transfer rather than this third phase.20 In MO, this last phase might be even of more importance because of the chronic aspect of the disease, the many surgical procedures generally performed in adulthood and the life-long burden of possible malignant degeneration. Considering these aspects, further research is needed on how these youngsters are affected in the third phase and whether providing developmentally appropriate healthcare and tools to obtain transitional skills can affect this phase.

    To our knowledge, no studies have been performed on transitional care of patients with MO.

    However, several other studies with a variety of chronic diseases, such as RMD and childhood cancer, have been performed and have actually promoted similar approaches for transitional care across these different diseases.20 45 Patients with MO may experience a lot of problems that are also encountered by patients with RMD and childhood cancer, such as chronic pain, functional impairment, chronic use of medication and the fear of relapse. On the contrary, patients with MO differ on several aspects, with MO being a chronic disease with a life-long risk of malignant degeneration, the necessity of multiple surgical procedures throughout life, but also on having a parent with the disease. Therefore, a different approach might be warranted and the disease-specific conditions should be an important part of the transition protocol.

    Even though the majority of studies in literature addressed a variety of chronic diseases, different chronic illnesses seem to require specific approaches; a ‘one size fits all’ transition programme’ will be insufficient.33 46 47

    Moreover, the majority of studies have focused on the paediatric setting and single perspectives of patients.28 48–53 Only a few studies investigated the views of healthcare providers in the adult care setting.29 54 55 This study provides a broad range of perspectives from different stakeholders in different settings. With the convergent parallel mixed-method design, we were able to provide different but complementary data on the same topic. Moreover, this design allowed us to bypass any social desirability bias from semi-structured interviews.

    This study is limited first by the small number of survey respondents due to the rare aspect of the disease. Second, not all patients could be reached, therefore it is not known whether they have dropped out of care or whether these patients experienced no problems during transition. Therefore, selection bias cannot be excluded. Finally, the hospital setting in this study is not generalisable. Studies showed that patients with other chronic diseases who had been transferred to the same hospital and same building were more satisfied with their transitional care.3 Although our patients were transferred within the same hospital but to a different building for their clinical admissions and surgical procedures, they still viewed it as a different hospital.

    Conclusions

    Overall, the transfer process for patients with MO was unsatisfactory. Patients should be more in the lead of their care and need to become independent from their parents. Self-management skills are underdeveloped in this group of patients and warrant more attention and support from healthcare providers. If not guided properly, transition can be a traumatising period especially for these patients.

    Therefore, an early and good preparation using an individualised transition plan, improving self-management skills and interprofessional collaboration are key elements for a successful transition process. Future research should point out whether translation of these recommendations to a transition protocol are effective in improving the quality of the transfer process in transitional care.

    Data availability statement

    The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board ACWO-MEC (OLVG, NL Reference No. WO 15.081).

    Acknowledgments

    We thank the Dutch HME-MO patient association and their chairman, J de Lange, MSc, for initial evaluation of the survey and assistance with recruiting participants via the association’s network. We also thank the orthopaedic and paediatric ward of the OLVG hospital for facilitating the interviews.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Blum RW,
      2. Garell D,
      3. Hodgman CH, et al
      . Transition from child-centered to adult health-care systems for adolescents with chronic conditions. A position paper of the Society for adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health 1993;14:570–6.doi:10.1016/1054-139x(93)90143-dpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/8312295
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Busse FP,
      2. Hiermann P,
      3. Galler A, et al
      . Evaluation of patients' opinion and metabolic control after transfer of young adults with type 1 diabetes from a pediatric diabetes clinic to adult care. Horm Res 2007;67:132–8.doi:10.1159/000096583pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/17065819
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Kipps S,
      2. Bahu T,
      3. Ong K, et al
      . Current methods of transfer of young people with type 1 diabetes to adult services. Diabet Med 2002;19:649–54.doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00757.xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/12147145
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Lotstein DS,
      2. Seid M,
      3. Klingensmith G, et al
      . Transition from pediatric to adult care for youth diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in adolescence. Pediatrics 2013;131:e1062–70.doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1450pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/23530167
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      1. Moons P,
      2. Hilderson D,
      3. Van Deyk K
      . Congenital cardiovascular nursing: preparing for the next decade. Cardiol Young 2009;19 Suppl 2:106–11.doi:10.1017/S1047951109991703pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/19857358
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Nakhla M,
      2. Daneman D,
      3. To T, et al
      . Transition to adult care for youths with diabetes mellitus: findings from a universal health care system. Pediatrics 2009;124:e1134–41.doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0041pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/19933731
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Reid GJ,
      2. Irvine MJ,
      3. McCrindle BW, et al
      . Prevalence and correlates of successful transfer from pediatric to adult health care among a cohort of young adults with complex congenital heart defects. Pediatrics 2004;113:e197–205.doi:10.1542/peds.113.3.e197pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/14993577
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Watson AR
      . Problems and pitfalls of transition from paediatric to adult renal care. Pediatr Nephrol 2005;20:113–7.doi:10.1007/s00467-004-1763-ypmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/15627164
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Yeung E,
      2. Kay J,
      3. Roosevelt GE, et al
      . Lapse of care as a predictor for morbidity in adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2008;125:62–5.doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.023pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/17442438
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Schmale GA,
      2. Conrad EU,
      3. Raskind WH
      . The natural history of hereditary multiple exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:986–92.doi:10.2106/00004623-199407000-00005pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/8027127
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Goud AL,
      2. de Lange J,
      3. Scholtes VAB, et al
      . Pain, physical and social functioning, and quality of life in individuals with multiple hereditary exostoses in the Netherlands: a national cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1013–20.doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00406pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/22637207
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Wicklund CL,
      2. Pauli RM,
      3. Johnston D, et al
      . Natural history study of hereditary multiple exostoses. Am J Med Genet 1995;55:43–6.doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320550113pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/7702095
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Sawyer SM,
      2. Afifi RA,
      3. Bearinger LH, et al
      . Adolescence: a foundation for future health. Lancet 2012;379:1630–40.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60072-5pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/22538178
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Great B,
      2. Child H,
      3. Maternity Services B
      . Transition : getting it right for young people : improving the transition of young people with long term conditions from children’s to adult health services. London: Department of Health, 2006.
    15. ↵
      1. Czajka CM,
      2. DiCaprio MR
      . What is the proportion of patients with multiple hereditary exostoses who undergo malignant degeneration? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:2355–61.doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4134-zpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/25582066
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Jäger M,
      2. Westhoff B,
      3. Portier S, et al
      . Clinical outcome and genotype in patients with hereditary multiple exostoses. J Orthop Res 2007;25:1541–51.doi:10.1002/jor.20479pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/17676624
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Pedrini E,
      2. Jennes I,
      3. Tremosini M, et al
      . Genotype-phenotype correlation study in 529 patients with multiple hereditary exostoses: identification of "protective" and "risk" factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:2294–302.doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00949pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/22258776
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Porter JS,
      2. Graff JC,
      3. Lopez AD, et al
      . Transition from pediatric to adult care in sickle cell disease: perspectives on the family role. J Pediatr Nurs 2014;29:158–67.doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2013.10.002pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/24188784
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. McDonagh JE,
      2. Farre A
      . Are we there yet? an update on transitional care in rheumatology. Arthritis Res Ther 2018;20:5.doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1502-ypmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/29325599
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. McDonagh JE,
      2. Farre A
      . Transitional Care in Rheumatology: a Review of the Literature from the Past 5 Years. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2019;21:57.doi:10.1007/s11926-019-0855-4pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/31492991
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Sadak KT,
      2. Gemeda MT,
      3. Grafelman M, et al
      . Identifying metrics of success for transitional care practices in childhood cancer survivorship: a qualitative interview study of survivors. BMC Cancer 2020;20:898.doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07360-9pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/32957976
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Creswell JW
      . A Concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE, 2015: 1–121.
    23. ↵
      1. Green J,
      2. Thorogood N
      . Qualitative methods for health research. SAGE, 2018: 1–410.
    24. ↵
      1. Mortelmans D
      . Manual qualitative research methods (in Dutch: Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden): Acco Leuven / den Haag, 2018: 1–557.
    25. ↵
      1. van Staa A,
      2. Sattoe JNT
      . Young adults' experiences and satisfaction with the transfer of care. J Adolesc Health 2014;55:796–803.doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.008pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/25149686
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. King N
      . Doing Template Analysis. In: Qualitative organizational research : core methods and current challenges. SAGE, 2012: 426–50.
    27. ↵
      1. Moons P,
      2. Pinxten S,
      3. Dedroog D, et al
      . Expectations and experiences of adolescents with congenital heart disease on being transferred from pediatric cardiology to an adult congenital heart disease program. J Adolesc Health 2009;44:316–22.doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.11.007pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/19306789
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Tuchman LK,
      2. Slap GB,
      3. Britto MT
      . Transition to adult care: experiences and expectations of adolescents with a chronic illness. Child Care Health Dev 2008;34:557–63.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00844.xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/18796047
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. van Staa AL,
      2. Jedeloo S,
      3. van Meeteren J, et al
      . Crossing the transition chasm: experiences and recommendations for improving transitional care of young adults, parents and providers. Child Care Health Dev 2011;37:821–32.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01261.xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/22007982
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      1. McLaughlin SE,
      2. Diener-West M,
      3. Indurkhya A, et al
      . Improving transition from pediatric to adult cystic fibrosis care: lessons from a national survey of current practices. Pediatrics 2008;121:e1160–6.doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2217pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/18450860
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Waldboth V,
      2. Patch C,
      3. Mahrer-Imhof R, et al
      . Living a normal life in an extraordinary way: a systematic review investigating experiences of families of young people's transition into adulthood when affected by a genetic and chronic childhood condition. Int J Nurs Stud 2016;62:44–59.doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.007pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/27450665
      OpenUrlPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Telfair J,
      2. Myers J,
      3. Drezner S
      . Transfer as a component of the transition of adolescents with sickle cell disease to adult care: adolescent, adult, and parent perspectives. J Adolesc Health 1994;15:558–65.doi:10.1016/1054-139X(94)90139-Tpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/7857954
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    33. ↵
      1. Sonneveld HM,
      2. Strating MMH,
      3. van Staa AL, et al
      . Gaps in transitional care: what are the perceptions of adolescents, parents and providers? Child Care Health Dev 2013;39:69–80.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01354.xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/22329453
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Anthony SJ,
      2. Martin K,
      3. Drabble A, et al
      . Perceptions of transitional care needs and experiences in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2009;9:614–9.doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02515.xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/19260839
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Leebens PK,
      2. Williamson ED
      . Developmental psychopathology: risk and resilience in the transition to young adulthood. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2017;26:143–56.doi:10.1016/j.chc.2016.12.001pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/28314447
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Farrant B,
      2. Watson PD
      . Health care delivery: perspectives of young people with chronic illness and their parents. J Paediatr Child Health 2004;40:175–9.doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00333.xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/15009544
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Chesney M,
      2. Lindeke L,
      3. Johnson L, et al
      . Comparison of child and parent satisfaction ratings of ambulatory pediatric subspecialty care. J Pediatr Health Care 2005;19:221–9.doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.02.003pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/16010261
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Mah JK,
      2. Tough S,
      3. Fung T, et al
      . Adolescent quality of life and satisfaction with care. J Adolesc Health 2006;38:607.e1–607.e7.doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.08.004pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/16635774
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    39. ↵
      1. Batbaatar E,
      2. Dorjdagva J,
      3. Luvsannyam A, et al
      . Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Perspect Public Health 2017;137:89–101.doi:10.1177/1757913916634136pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/27004489
      OpenUrlPubMed
    40. ↵
      1. Dabadie A,
      2. Troadec F,
      3. Heresbach D, et al
      . Transition of patients with inflammatory bowel disease from pediatric to adult care. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008;32:451–9.doi:10.1016/j.gcb.2008.01.044pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/18472377
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    41. ↵
      1. Garvey KC,
      2. Wolpert HA,
      3. Laffel LM, et al
      . Health care transition in young adults with type 1 diabetes: barriers to timely establishment of adult diabetes care. Endocr Pract 2013;19:946–52.doi:10.4158/EP13109.ORpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/23807526
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    42. ↵
      1. Fegran L,
      2. Hall EOC,
      3. Uhrenfeldt L, et al
      . Adolescents' and young adults' transition experiences when transferring from paediatric to adult care: a qualitative metasynthesis. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:123–35.doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.02.001pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/23490470
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. ↵
      1. Lugasi T,
      2. Achille M,
      3. Stevenson M
      . Patients' perspective on factors that facilitate transition from child-centered to adult-centered health care: a theory integrated metasummary of quantitative and qualitative studies. J Adolesc Health 2011;48:429–40.doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.10.016pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/21501800
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    44. ↵
      1. Colver A,
      2. McConachie H,
      3. Le Couteur A, et al
      . A longitudinal, observational study of the features of transitional healthcare associated with better outcomes for young people with long-term conditions. BMC Med 2018;16:111.doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1102-ypmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/30032726
      OpenUrlPubMed
    45. ↵
      1. Nguyen T,
      2. Stewart D,
      3. Gorter JW
      . Looking back to move forward: reflections and lessons learned about transitions to adulthood for youth with disabilities. Child Care Health Dev 2018;44:83–8.doi:10.1111/cch.12534pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/29082531
      OpenUrlPubMed
    46. ↵
      1. Boyle MP,
      2. Farukhi Z,
      3. Nosky ML
      . Strategies for improving transition to adult cystic fibrosis care, based on patient and parent views. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001;32:428–36.doi:10.1002/ppul.1154pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/11747245
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    47. ↵
      1. Dogba MJ,
      2. Rauch F,
      3. Wong T, et al
      . From pediatric to adult care: strategic evaluation of a transition program for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:489.doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0489-1pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/25366588
      OpenUrlPubMed
    48. ↵
      1. Kirk S
      . Transitions in the lives of young people with complex healthcare needs. Child Care Health Dev 2008;34:567–75.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00862.xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/18796049
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    49. ↵
      1. Soanes C,
      2. Timmons S
      . Improving transition: a qualitative study examining the attitudes of young people with chronic illness transferring to adult care. J Child Health Care 2004;8:102–12.doi:10.1177/1367493504041868pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/15157366
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    50. ↵
      1. Stabile L,
      2. Rosser L,
      3. Porterfield KM, et al
      . Transfer versus transition: success in pediatric transplantation brings the welcome challenge of transition. Prog Transplant 2005;15:363–70.doi:10.1177/152692480501500408pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/16477819
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    51. ↵
      1. Wiener LS,
      2. Kohrt B-A,
      3. Battles HB, et al
      . The HIV experience: youth identified barriers for transitioning from pediatric to adult care. J Pediatr Psychol 2011;36:141–54.doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp129pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/20040607
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    52. ↵
      1. Wray J,
      2. Maynard L
      . Specialist cardiac services: what do young people want? Cardiol Young 2008;18:569–74.doi:10.1017/S104795110800317Xpmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/18940027
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    53. ↵
      1. Valenzuela JM,
      2. Buchanan CL,
      3. Radcliffe J, et al
      . Transition to adult services among behaviorally infected adolescents with HIV--a qualitative study. J Pediatr Psychol 2011;36:134–40.doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp051pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/19542198
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    54. ↵
      1. Ostlie IL,
      2. Dale O,
      3. Möller A
      . From childhood to adult life with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:445–52.doi:10.1080/09638280600835994pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/17364799
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    55. ↵
      1. Shaw KL,
      2. Southwood TR,
      3. McDonagh JE, et al
      . Transitional care for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a Delphi study. Rheumatology 2004;43:1000–6.doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh216pmid:http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.u-pec.fr/pubmed/15150431
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Footnotes

    • Correction notice The article has been corrected since it was published online. In the abstract the amount of patients to fill in an additional survey has been updated to 20 young adults.

    • Contributors IA was responsible for the study design, data acquisition, analyses and interpretation, as well as for drafting the manuscript, revision and final approval. RM was involved in the study design and responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the data, revision of the manuscript and final approval. MvW, RS and SJH were involved in the study design, data interpretation, revision and final approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    • Funding The study is supported by grants from the Innovation Fund OLVG and the research fund of the Dutch HME-MO association.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.