You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 11, Issue 2
  • Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research

Article info

Article menu
XML
Dermatology
Original research
Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research

Authors

  • Athena Ip School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Ingrid Muller School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Adam W A Geraghty School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Duncan Platt School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Paul Little School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Miriam Santer School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Athena Ip; a.ip{at}soton.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Ip A, Muller I, Geraghty AWA, et al
Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
BMJ Open 2021;11:e041794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041794

Publication history

  • Received June 18, 2020
  • Revised January 5, 2021
  • Accepted January 14, 2021
  • First published February 1, 2021.
Online issue publication 
February 01, 2021
Previous versions
Review history

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.