Table 3

Logistic models predicting met the US preventive service task force cancer screening guidelines for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer (CRC) by low health literacy (LHL) and limited English proficiency (LEP) combinations in 2007 California Health Interview Survey among Chinese respondents

 Breast cancer screeningCervical cancer screeningCRC screening
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
LHL and LEP combinations
 LHL and LEP0.21 (0.08 to 0.54)*0.41 (0.15 to 1.13)0.49 (0.25 to 0.97)*
 LEP only0.85 (0.27 to 2.72)0.60 (0.15 to 2.34)0.50 (0.21 to 1.17)
 LHL only0.92 (0.24 to 3.57)0.37 (0.15 to 0.92)*0.50 (0.23 to 1.08)
 NeitherRefRefRef
Education
 Less than HS1.34 (0.32 to 5.73)0.92 (0.23 to 3.73)0.50 (0.14 to 1.82)
 High school graduation1.10 (0.34 to 3.45)1.28 (0.40 to 4.10)1.01 (0.46 to 2.26)
 College graduation0.46 (0.16 to 1.37)1.14 (0.40 to 3.28)0.77 (0.33 to 1.77)
 More than college degreeRefRefRef
Control variables
 Born in USA0.72 (0.16 to 3.26)0.91 (0.30 to 2.75)0.85 (0.41 to 1.80)
 Age1.02 (0.96 to 1.07)1.06 (1.03 to 1.10)*1.04 (0.99 to 1.08)
 Female0.89 (0.49 to 1.61)
 ≤100% Fed poverty level1.50 (0.44 to 5.13)0.95 (0.29 to 3.08)0.96 (0.35 to 2.64)
 Rural residency1.01 (0.17 to 6.06)0.45 (0.09 to 2.20)1.23 (0.25 to 6.07)
 Married0.66 (0.23 to 1.89)2.29 (1.06 to 4.94)*0.76 (0.27 to 2.10)
 Insured0.92 (0.23 to 3.66)1.31 (0.44 to 3.91)2.32 (0.81 to 6.64)
 Visited doctor in past year4.90 (1.67 to 14.36)*2.57 (1.31 to 5.05)*2.04 (1.06 to 3.93)*
 Language discordant provider0.59 (0.21 to 1.63)
  • *Factors significant p<0.05.

  • LEP, limited English proficiency; LHL, lowhealth literacy; HS, high school.