Participants’ preferences for risk assessments and the relative importance of each attribute in asymptomatic and symptomatic context cohorts (conditional logistic regression analysis)
Asymptomatic context cohort | Symptomatic context cohort | P value for difference between cohorts | |
N participants | 601 | 601 | <0.001 (between models as a whole) |
N observations | 16 227 | 16 227 | |
Pseudo R2 | 0.0975 | 0.2118 | |
Constant | |||
No risk assessment | −0.679 (−0.823 to −0.536) | −0.829 (−0.986 to −0.672) | 0.165 |
Method of risk assessment | |||
Questionnaire or data access | Reference | Reference | |
Blood test | 0.321 (0.194 to 0.448) | 0.956 (0.822 to 1.090) | <0.001 |
Non-invasive test | 0.316 (0.207 to 0.425) | 0.717 (0.602 to 0.832) | <0.001 |
Wearable device | −0.184 (−0.353 to −0.014) | 0.273 (0.101 to 0.444) | <0.001 |
Type of risk assessment | |||
Non-genetic | Reference | Reference | |
Genetic | −0.007 (−0.153 to 0.138) | 0.147 (−0.011 to 0.305) | 0.163 |
Location of risk assessment | |||
Home | Reference | Reference | |
Community clinic/pharmacy | −0.029 (−0.141 to 0.084) | 0.106 (−0.011 to 0.223) | 0.107 |
General practice | −0.097 (−0.213 to 0.018) | −0.009 (−0.133 to 0.114) | 0.311 |
Hospital | −0.221 (−0.330 to −0.113) | −0.029 (−0.136 to 0.078) | 0.014 |
Frequency of risk assessment | |||
One-off single event | Reference | Reference | |
Once every 5 years | −0.002 (−0.137 to 0.133) | 0.006 (−0.139 to 0.150) | 0.941 |
Once every year | −0.056 (−0.172 to 0.059) | −0.001 (−0.122 to 0.120) | 0.512 |
Continuously for 2 weeks | 0.205 (−0.043 to 0.454) | −0.032 (−0.283 to 0.219) | 0.185 |
Constantly | −0.034 (−0.198 to 0.130) | 0.099 (−0.073 to 0.270) | 0.269 |
Accuracy | |||
Specificity | 0.042 (0.035 to 0.049) | 0.048 (0.040 to 0.055) | 0.262 |
Sensitivity | 0.059 (0.053 to 0.066) | 0.081 (0.074 to 0.088) | <0.001 |
Results where p<0.05 are highlighted in bold.
Accuracy levels were presented as number of people out of every 100 people who have a risk assessment whose risk will be overestimated [specificity]/underestimated [sensitivity].
Positive coefficients indicate a preference for the specified level compared to the reference; negative coefficients indicate a preference for the reference compared to the specified level.