Table 5

Factor associations with PIM prescriptions based on all five Beers criteria categories (n=1600)

Crude OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)P value (Wald’s test)
Health coverage (ref.=universal coverage)0.298
 Government1.69 (0.63 to 4.55)0.96 (0.75 to 1.23)0.727
 Cash0.82 (0.44 to 1.51)0.70 (0.34 to 1.45)0.336
 State enterprise officer1.90 (0.72 to 4.98)2.59 (0.88 to 7.57)0.083
 Social security scheme1.69 (0.63 to 4.55)1.56 (0.51 to 4.76)0.434
Gender: female1.14 (0.92 to 1.4)1.22 (0.98 to 1.52)0.069
Age1.02 (1.01 to 1.04)1.02 (1.00 to 1.03)0.053
Doctor: staff (compare with trainee doctor)1.77 (1.30 to 2.41)1.84 (1.33 to 2.54)<0.001
Number of underlying diseases1.55 (1.38 to 1.73)1.59 (1.42 to 1.79)<0.001
Number of clinic visits for follow-up0.98 (0.85 to 1.11)0.88 (0.76 to 1.01)0.067
Diagnosis: presenting with acute illness (compare with follow-up only)1.54 (1.25 to 1.88)1.58 (1.28 to 1.94)<0.001
  • PIM, potentially inappropriate medications.