Table 2

Relationship of QLF extent (%) and volume (mL) with the anchor-based MCID of SGRQ and FVC using Jaeschke’s method

AnchorAdjusted corresponding QLF values of thresholds compared with stable condition*
Week 24Week 48
SGRQ change
SGRQWhole lungImproved† (N=48)Worsened† (N=41)Improved† (N=41)Worsened† (N=42)
QLF, %≤0.5≥4.4‡≤ –2.8‡≥2.3
95% CI(−1.5, 2.5)(2.3, 6.5)(−5.4, −0.2)(−0.3, 4.9)
QLF, mL≤10≥91‡≤ –54 ≥81‡
95% CI(−38, 58)(41, 141)(−118, 9)(18, 144)
ppFVC change
Improved† (N=20)Worsened† (N=49)Improved† (N=20)Worsened† (N=53)
ppFVCQLF, %≤–2.0≥3.6‡≤–2.1≥4.3‡
95% CI(−4.5, 0.6)(1.7, 5.4)(−5.1, 0.8)(2.1, 6.4)
QLF, mL≤–56≥65‡≤–65≥108‡
95% CI(−118, 7)(20, 110)(−143, 13)(51, 164)
  • *Shifted by the mean changes at ±5 points SGRQ and ±3.4% ppFVC; stated with two significant figures.

  • †Worsened: SGRQ change ≥5 points or ppFVC change ≤3.4%; stable: SGRQ change between –5 and 5 points or ppFVC change between –3.4% and 3.4%; improved: SGRQ change ≤–5 points or ppFVC change ≥3.4%.

  • ‡Two 95% CIs of the difference between the improved and stable groups and the difference between worse and stable groups are not overwrapped. 95% CIs were obtained from a one-way ANOVA model in the model. Comparisons are obtained from the same model using the least squares means (LSMEANS) statement.

  • ANOVA, analysis of variance; FVC, forced vital capacity; MCID, minimum clinically important difference; ppFVC, percent-predicted forced vital capacity; QLF, Quantitative Lung Fibrosis score; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.