Illustration of pros and cons of different measures of relational continuity of care
Continuity index | |||||||
Clinician group | Patient group | Criterion | SLICC | UPC | BB | Hi | SECON |
Consultation with GP only | Age ages | Understandable | Good | Good | Fair | Fair | Fair |
Unaffected by consultation rate | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | Fair | ||
Patient conception | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | Poor | ||
Clinician conception | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | ||
Aged 65+ only | Understandable | ||||||
Unaffected by consultation rate | |||||||
Patient conception | |||||||
Clinician conception | |||||||
Consultation with all clinical staff | All ages | Understandable | |||||
Unaffected by consultation rate | |||||||
Patient conception | |||||||
Clinician conception | |||||||
Aged 65+ only | Understandable | ||||||
Unaffected by consultation rate | |||||||
Patient conception | |||||||
Clinician conception |
BB, Bice–Boxerman index; HI, Herfindahl index; SECON, Sequential Continuity; SLICC, St Leonard’s Index of Continuity of Care; UPC, Usual Provider of Care index.