Table 4

Summary of accelerated failure time* regression (‘log-logistic’) for job type: paramedic

VariableEstimate95% CIP value†Direction interpretation‡
Age−0.0047(−0.013, 0.0039)
GenderMale (reference)
Female0.061(−0.038, 0.16)
NationalityBritish (reference)
Not declared−0.21(−0.54, 0.13)
Other0.018(−0.084, 0.12)
Marital statusSingle (reference)
Divorced/legally separated/widowed0.14(−0.24, 0.52)
Married/civil partnership0.031(−0.12, 0.18)
Not declared−0.16(−0.38, 0.05)
Pay scaleBand 5 (reference)
Band 6+−0.23(−0.44, −0.019)<0.05… that time to leaving role decreases as pay increases
Staff absence duration (ratio of month)0.04(0.03, 0.06)<0.005… that time to leaving role increases as time lost to short-term absences increases
Overtime (hours)Payment in lieu of breaks0.28(0.23, 0.34)<0.005… that time to leaving role increases for employees who work through breaks
Planned0.25(0.18, 0.32)<0.005… that time to leaving role increases for employees who work planned overtime
Unplanned0.14(−0.015, 0.3)<0.1… that time to leaving role increases where employees work unplanned overtime
Incidents (per shift worked)0.18(−0.13, 0.5)
Percentage of incidents attended in a month by IMD of incident location§IMD: 1 (%)0.0049(−0.013, 0.023)
IMD: 2 (%)0.0042(−0.0066, 0.015)
IMD: 3 (%) (excluded)¶
IMD: 4 (%)0.0083(−0.0031, 0.02)
IMD: 5 (%)0.0006(−0.01, 0.012)
IMD: 6 (%)−0.0037(−0.015, 0.0072)
IMD: 7 (%)−0.0084(−0.021, 0.004)
IMD: 8 (%)−0.028(−0.038, −0.017)< 0.005… that time to leaving role decreases for employees who respond to more incidents at IMD:8 locales
IMD: 9 (%)0.014(−0.00081, 0.03)<0.1… that time to leaving role increases for employees who respond to more incidents at IMD:9 locales
IMD: 10 (%)0.034(0.0079, 0.06)<0.05… that time to leaving role increases for employees who respond to more incidents at IMD:10 locales
Job cycle time
(hours per shift worked)
‘Mobilisation’1.4(−0.74, 3.6)
‘Running’0.29(−0.4, 0.98)
‘On scene’0.18(0.052, 0.31)< 0.01… that time to leaving role increases for employees who spend more time at the scene of incidents
‘To hospital‘−0.68(−1.10, −0.22)<0.005… that time to leaving role decreases for employees who spend more time conveying patients
‘Arrived at hospital to patient handover’0.17(−0.017, 0.36)<0.1…that time to leaving role increases for employees who spend more time waiting at hospitals
‘Patient handover to clear’0.2(−0.18, 0.58)
Non-JCT0.097(0.057, 0.14)<0.005… that time to leaving role increases for employees who spend more time outside JCT tasks
Incident category (per shift worked)Calls from people with life-threatening illnesses or injuries (Category 1)−0.33(−0.64, −0.018)<0.05… that time to leaving role decreases for employees who respond to more ‘Category 1’ incidents
Emergency calls (Category 2)−0.32(−0.63, −0.00)<0.05… that time to leaving role decreases for employees who respond to more ‘Category 2’ incidents
Urgent calls (Category 3)−0.068(−0.42, 0.28)
  • *The accelerated failure time model is operating as a survival model in the implementation reported and hence a significant positive coefficient is indicative of an increased average survival time as the covariate increases.

  • †P value limits have been drawn from ‘An Introduction to Medical Statistics (Bland 2015)’.29

  • ‡Coefficients with p value>0.1 are represented by ‘-’.

  • §IMDs are ordered from IMD:1 (highest levels of deprivation) to IMD: 10 (lowest levels of deprivations).

  • ¶IMD: 3 was removed from the analysis feature space to avoid over-specification of the model and was selected for removal as the most frequently attended IMD, and hence giving the most power as a reference category.

  • IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation; JCT, job cycle time.