Results about the agreement level in the top tertile (7–9) for primary and secondary competency indicators
| Competency indicators | Round 1 | Round 2 | ||
| Importance | Feasibility | Importance | Feasibility | |
| 1. Medical services | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 1.1 Clinical knowledge and skills | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 1.2 Diagnosis and treatment | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 1.3 Chronic disease management | 94.7% | 94.7% | 100% | 100% |
| 1.4 Communication | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2. Teaching | 94.7% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2.1 Theoretical lectures | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2.2 Practical teaching | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2.3 Joint teaching with primary care* | 100% | 100% | ||
| 2.4 Self-directed learning | 94.7% | 84.2% | 94.7% | 84.2% |
| 3. Research | 78.9% | 63.2% | 89.5% | 84.2% |
| 3.1 Project design and declaration | 73.7% | 73.7% | 89.5% | 89.5% |
| 3.2 Scientific research | 73.7% | 78.9% | 89.5% | 89.5% |
| 3.3 Data processing† | 63.2% | 63.2% | – | – |
| 3.4 Write paper and submission | 73.7% | 78.9% | 84.2% | 84.2% |
| 4. Prevention | 100% | 94.7% | 100% | 94.7% |
| 4.1 Disease prevention | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94.7% |
| 4.2 Screening | 100% | 100% | 100% | 84.2% |
Note that indicators in the table are modified versions before two rounds of consultation; experts rated the importance and feasibility of each indicator on a 1–9 Likert scale (1=not important/feasible and 9=very important/feasible).
*Secondary indicator ‘2.3 Joint teaching with primary care’ was merged into the secondary indicator ‘2.2 Practical teaching’ after round 1.
†Secondary indicator ‘3.3 Data processing’ was deleted due to not achieving consensus level after round 1.