Table 2

Results about the agreement level in the top tertile (7–9) for primary and secondary competency indicators

Competency indicatorsRound 1Round 2
ImportanceFeasibilityImportanceFeasibility
1. Medical services100%100%100%100%
 1.1 Clinical knowledge and skills100%100%100%100%
 1.2 Diagnosis and treatment100%100%100%100%
 1.3 Chronic disease management94.7%94.7%100%100%
 1.4 Communication100%100%100%100%
2. Teaching94.7%100%100%100%
 2.1 Theoretical lectures100%100%100%100%
 2.2 Practical teaching100%100%100%100%
 2.3 Joint teaching with primary care*100%100%
 2.4 Self-directed learning94.7%84.2%94.7%84.2%
3. Research78.9%63.2%89.5%84.2%
 3.1 Project design and declaration73.7%73.7%89.5%89.5%
 3.2 Scientific research73.7%78.9%89.5%89.5%
 3.3 Data processing†63.2%63.2%
 3.4 Write paper and submission73.7%78.9%84.2%84.2%
4. Prevention100%94.7%100%94.7%
 4.1 Disease prevention100%100%100%94.7%
 4.2 Screening100%100%100%84.2%
  • Note that indicators in the table are modified versions before two rounds of consultation; experts rated the importance and feasibility of each indicator on a 1–9 Likert scale (1=not important/feasible and 9=very important/feasible).

  • *Secondary indicator ‘2.3 Joint teaching with primary care’ was merged into the secondary indicator ‘2.2 Practical teaching’ after round 1.

  • †Secondary indicator ‘3.3 Data processing’ was deleted due to not achieving consensus level after round 1.