Table 2

Comparisons of stone anatomical localisation in patients with different stone compositions

VariableOverall,
n=858
Bladder stone, n=25Urethra stones, n=18Kidney stone, n=207Ureter stone, n=608 P value
CaOx686 (80.0)13 (52.0)12 (66.7)164 (79.2)497 (81.7) 0.003
 COD156 (18.2)4 (16.0)4 (22.2)24 (11.6)124 (20.4) 0.027
 COM530 (61.8)9 (36.0)8 (44.4)140 (67.6)373 (61.3) 0.006
CA79 (9.2)1 (4.0)2 (11.1)17 (8.2)59 (9.7)0.757
UA42 (4.9)10 (40.0)2 (11.1)9 (4.4)21 (3.5) <0.001
Mixed42 (4.9)0 (0)2 (11.1)13 (6.3)27 (4.4)0.224
MAP7 (0.8)1 (4.0)0 (0)3 (1.5)3 (0.5)0.117
SA1 (0.1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.2)>0.999
Brushite1 (0.1)0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.5)0 (0)0.291
  • Note: n (%); P value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s χ2 test.

  • CaOx was categorised as either CaOx dihydrate (COD) or CaOx monohydrate (COM).

  • CA, carbonate apatite; CaOx, calcium oxalate; MAP, magnesium ammonium phosphate; SA, sodium acid urate monohydrate; UA, uric acid.