Table 6

Primary Outcomes

Bisphosphonate useDenosumab use
Intervention baseline CAC (modified AU) ∆ CAC from baseline (modified AU)Control baseline CAC (modified AU) ∆ CAC from baseline (modified AU)P valueEffect sizeIntervention baseline CAC (modified AU) ∆ CAC from baseline (modified AU)Control baseline CAC (modified AU) ∆ CAC from baseline (Modified AU)P valueEffect size
Ariyoshi et al, 200674100±2440+880/12 months8990±15 180+2220/12 monthsNot reported
Chen et al, 202016 2271±511−133±124/6 months2034±653+188±72/6 months0.03Not reported
Hill et al, 200214 108±290 (0–1650)+2.4/month102±264 (0–1467)+3.1 /month0.46Not reported
Nitta et al, 200481489 (168–8768)−372/12 months1303 (231–3133)+159/12 months0.01Not reported
Pawade et al, 202122*1268 (672–2065)+326 (138–813)/24 months1127 (617–2059)+354 (76–675)/24 months0.49Difference in means: 196 AU (95% CI −286 to 679 AU),
p=0.42
Effect size powered at 40%
1163 (598–2151)+343 (198–804)/24 months1127 (617 to 2059)+354 (76–675)/24 months0.41Difference in means: 169 AU (95% CI
−304 to 643 AU),
p=0.48
Effect size powered at 40%
  • Data are either given as means±SD, with ranges in parentheses, or as means with ranges in parentheses.

  • *The study conducted by Pawade et al 22 reported specifically on the aortic valve calcium score (modified AU).

  • †The studies conducted by Ariyoshi et al 7 and Nitta et al 8 reported CAC in mm3 rather than modified AU.

  • AU, Agatston unit; CAC, coronary artery calcification.