Sensitivity analyses of the impact of a ‘more effective’ PATPH working environment on job satisfaction of healthcare professionals
| Model | Design | A ‘more effective’ PATPH working environment | ||
| Coefficient | 95% CI† | P value | ||
| Model 1 | Primary analysis | 9.57 | 8.99 to 10.16 | *** |
| Model 5* | Different threshold: 50th percentile (≥14) Sample size=8417 | 8.14 | 7.62 to 8.66 | *** |
| Model 6* | Different threshold: mean+SD (≥18.45) Sample size=8417 | 9.83 | 9.21 to 10.45 | *** |
| Model 7 | Different outcome models with the random effect of province Sample size=8417 | 9.30 | 7.36 to 11.24 | *** |
| Model 8*‡ | Different population including whole medical personnel of all position Sample size=11 138 | 9.51 | 9.00 to 10.01 | *** |
***p<0.001.
*Weights in model 5, model 6 and model 8 were constructed in line with the primary analysis (ie, the same equilibrium of weighted population had been achieved and the weights were also truncated at the 99th percentile.
†CIs of model 5, model 6 and model 8 were estimated by the robust variance estimator ‘sandwich’.
‡After coding the variables, 11 138 fully answered responses (84.31% in 13211) from participants in all position were included in the model 8.
PATPH, Performance Appraisal for Tertiary Public Hospitals.