Baseline characteristics of the study population
Number (percent) | Mean (SD) Median (IQR) | Missing count (percent) | |
Patients characteristics | |||
Sex | 0 (0) | ||
1=Male | 206 (34.2) | ||
2=Female | 397 (65.8) | ||
Age | 44,5 (15.7) | 1 (0.2) | |
44,0 (31–56) | |||
Symptoms | |||
Pain intensity at baseline (0–10) Higher scores indicate a higher degree of pain. | 5,9 (1.9) 6 (5–7) | 0 (0) | |
Duration of neck pain | 4.5 (2.9) | 0 (0) | |
Number of weeks | 4 (2–6) | ||
Recurrent pain | 1 (0.2) | ||
1=No | 198 (32.8) | ||
2=Yes | 404 (67) | ||
Reported pain in different body regions | 4 (0.7) | ||
1=No | 210 (34.8) | ||
2=Yes | 389 (64.5) | ||
Accompanying headache | 5 (0.8) | ||
1=No | 247 (41) | ||
2=Yes | 281 (46.6) | ||
3=I had headache(s) before the neck pain. | 70 (11.6) | ||
Disability (0–7) Higher scores indicate higher interference of pain with daily activity. The sum score divided by the entered items. | 2.73 (2.1) 2.3 (1.0–4.1) | 1 (0.2) | |
Work related factors | |||
Work status | 10 (1.7) | ||
1=Yes | 501 (83.1) | ||
2=No | 92 (15.3) | ||
Education | 16 (2.7) | ||
0=Low level of education | 313 (51.9) | ||
1=High level of eduction | 274 (45.4) | ||
Happiness at work | 23 (3.8) | ||
1=Happy (ref) | 376 (62.4) | ||
2=Neutral or not happy | 112 (18.6) | ||
3=Not working | 92 (19) | ||
Job satisfaction | 21 (3.5) | ||
1=Satisfied (ref) | 404 (67) | ||
2=Neutral or not satisfied | 86 (14.3) | ||
3=Not working | 92 (18.7) | ||
Potential to self-modify posture | 25 (4.2) | ||
1=Possible (ref) | 372 (61.7) | ||
2=Neutral or impossible | 114 (18.9) | ||
3=Not working | 92 (19.4) | ||
General factors | |||
Physical activity | 8 (1.3) | ||
0=Achieving the Dutch Healthy Exercise Norm | 219 (36.3) | ||
1=Not achieving the Dutch Healthy Exercise Norm | 376 (62.3) | ||
Smoking | 3 (0.5) | ||
1=No | 528 (87.6) | ||
2=Yes | 72 (11.9) | ||
Alcohol | 5 (0.8) | ||
1=No | 129 (21.4) | ||
2=Yes | 469 (77.8) | ||
Body mass index (BMI) | 25.31 (4.3) 24.66 (22.5–27.7) | ||
Sleep quality | 2 (0.3) | ||
0=No negative experience with sleeping | 130 (21.6) | ||
1=Negative experience with sleeping | 471 (78.1) | ||
Psychological and behaviour factors | |||
Catastrophising (0–24) Higher scores indicate more catastrophic thoughts | 4.58 (4.6) 3 (1–7) | 3 (0.5) | |
Illness beliefs about recovery (Duration 0–10) 0 a very short time–10 forever. Higher scores indicate a maladaptive illness perception | 4.13 (2.7) 3 (2–6) | 10 (1.7) | |
Illness beliefs about recovery (Concerned 0–10) 0 not at all concerned–10 extremely concerned. Higher scores indicate a maladaptive illness perception. | 3.96 (2.6) 4 (2–6) | 8 (1.3) | |
Treatment beliefs (0–10) 0 not at all–10 extremely helpful. A lower score indicates a maladaptive illness perception. | 7.82 (1.9) 8 (7–9) | 12 (2.0) | |
Depression (0–21) Higher scores indicate a higher degree of depression. | 2.47 (3.3) 1 (0–4) | 3 (0.5) | |
Kinesiophobia (11–44) Higher scores indicate a higher degree of kinesiophobia. | 16.5 (5.2) 15 (12–20) | 3 (0.5) | |
Distress (0–21) Higher scores indicate a higher degree of stress. | 4.4 (4.1) 3 (1–7) | 3 (0.5) | |
Coping | 5 (0.8) | ||
0=Passive coping | 120 (19.9) | ||
1=Active coping | 478 (79.3) | ||
Illness beliefs about pain identity (0–10) 0 don’t understand at all—10 understand very clearly. A lower score indicates a maladaptive illness perception. | 6.11 (2.3) 6 (5–8) | 14 (2.3) | |
Hypervigilance (0–80) Higher scores indicate a higher degree of vigilance. | 31.0 (11.4) 31 (23–38) | 3 (0.5) | |
Self-efficacy (0–12) Higher scores indicate a higher degree of self-efficacy. | 10.31 (2.3) 11 (10–12) | 2 (0.3) | |
Remaining factors | |||
Therapeutic relation (0–10) 0 no trust at all–10 very much confidence. | 8.79 (1.4) 9 (8–10) | 10 (1.7) | |
Healthcare provider attitude | 49 (8.1)* | ||
1=Biomedical | 134 (22.2) | ||
2=Biopsychosocial | 420 (69.7) |
*We missed the attitude measurement for 14 of the 94 physiotherapists, including a total of 49 patients.