Table 3

Overall ethics implementation attitude to MAI social experiments among physicians, nurses and health information technicians in paediatrics (N=322)

AttitudeDisagree, n (%)Neutral, n (%)Agree, n (%)
A1 AI experts should be involved in the research ethics committee for MAI social experiments in paediatrics.18 (5.4)66 (19.9)248 (74.7)
A2 Principles, norms and guidelines on implementing ethics in MAI social experiments in paediatrics should be easy to understand and be transformed into a workable process.5 (1.5)47 (14.2)280 (84.3)
A3 Ethical researchers should be involved in MAI social experiments in paediatrics.4 (1.2)56 (16.9)272 (81.9)
A4 A unified ethical review can be a barrier to performing MAI social experiments in paediatrics.87 (26.2)139 (41.9)106 (31.9)
A5 Clarified subjects of ethical responsibility in MAI social experiments in paediatrics can facilitate ethical supervision.4 (1.2)59 (17.8)269 (81.0)
A6 Participating in ethical education and training programmes focusing on MAI social experiments is helpful for ethical supervision.3 (0.9)46 (13.9)283 (85.2)
A7 It is necessary to take children’s and guardians' opinions into account while performing MAI social experiments in paediatrics. When children’s views are contrary to the guardians', we should adopt the guardians' views.62 (18.7)81 (24.4)189 (56.9)
A8 Establishing an effective supervision mechanism is helpful.4 (1.2)42 (12.7)286 (86.1)
A9 Content of ethical supervision can be dynamically adjusted according to the clinical context.12 (3.6)63 (19.0)257 (77.4)
A10 The number of children or guardians against MAI will increase after having a comprehensive understanding of the ethical risk of MAI social experiments in paediatrics.73 (22.0)139 (41.9)120 (36.1)
A11 Strict ethical risk management can hinder performing MAI social experiments in paediatrics.79 (23.8)139 (41.9)114 (34.3)
  • AI, artificial intelligence; MAI, medical AI.