Methodology at a glance
Phase 1 (formative phase) | Phase 2 (quantitative cross-sectional survey) | Phase 3 (explanatory phase for formulating interventions) | |||
Literature review | Qualitative interview | Explanatory phase | Intervention formulation | ||
Methodology | Qualitative | Quantitative | Qualitative | ||
Data collection technique | Evidence synthesis through review of global and national documents, scientific articles, guidelines, etc. | IDI, FGD, KII | Survey | IDI, KII | Intervention design workshops, validation workshop |
Study population | IDI and FGD: MSM, MSW, hijra engaged in chemsex KII: DIC service providers, researchers, academicians, programme personnel, policymakers, sexologists, gender specialist and other relevant stakeholders | MSM, MSW and hijra who are aged between 18 and 70 years, and enlisted in the participant list of the selected DICs | IDI: MSM, MSW, hijra engaged in chemsex KII: service providers and stakeholders knowledgeable about chemsex | Relevant stakeholders | |
Sample size and sampling method (total number of interviews: Qualitative (IDI, KII, FGD): 37–58 Quantitative: 458) | IDI (15-20): maximum variation sampling KII (10-15): intensity sampling FGD (2-3): convenience sampling | Sample size: 458 Sampling: the sample size will be proportionately distributed among MSM/MSW/hijra enlisted at four DICs and selected randomly from the mother list | IDI (5-10): maximum variation sampling KII (5-10): intensity sampling |
| |
Data collection tool | Interview and FGD guidelines | Survey questionnaire | Interview guidelines | ||
Data analysis | Thematic analysis | Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis | Thematic analysis | ||
Expected outcome of the phase |
| To measure the prevalence of chemsex, reasons for engaging in chemsex and sexual risk behaviour associated with chemsex |
|
DIC, drop-in centre; FGD, focus group discussion; IDI, in-depth interviews; KII, key informant interviews; MSM, men who have sex with men; MSW, male sex workers.