Table 4

Candidate outcomes ratings in two rounds Delphi and voting at consensus meetings

Candidate outcomesRound 1 (n=39)Round 2 (n=39)Redefined outcomesConsensus meeting voting (n=24)
% score 1–3% score 4–6% score 7–9% score 1–3% score 4–6% score 7–9% yes
Pain0%5%95%nrnrnrPain/discomfort100%
Function3%5%92%nrnrnrLumbar function100%
ADL0%5%95%nrnrnrADL92%
ROM10%26%64%5%18%77%ROM50%
Symptoms5%15%79%5%8%87%nrnr
Measure of walking5%28%67%0%8%92%Walking function96%
Global rating of change3%26%72%3%15%82%PGA88%
AE0%21%79%0%15%85%AE100%
Biomarks28%41%31%21%51%28%Biomarks4%
Radiographic changes5%33%62%3%31%67%Radiographic changes38%
CM-specific outcomes8%28%64%3%21%77%CM-specific outcomes88%
Mental health5%36%59%3%38%59%Mental health63%
Satisfaction index0%28%72%0%26%74%Satisfaction index21%
Quality of life3%13%85%nrnrnrHRQoL96%
Adherence and attrition8%33%59%5%31%64%Adherence and attrition4%
Psychosocial49%38%13%49%41%10%Psychosocial21%
Resource use8%26%67%5%23%72%Resource use58%
  • ADL, activities of daily living; AE, adverse events; CM, Chinese medicine; HRQoL, health-related QOL; nr, not reported; PGA, patient global assessment; QOL, quality of life; ROM, range of movement.