Table 2

Characteristics of included articles

AuthorYearCountrynType of articleConditionDescription of use of advance consent
Backlar241999USA369CommentaryPsychiatric: schizophreniaAuthor discusses the theoretical use of research advance directives.
Biros et al261995USA303Consensus statementNo specific condition mentioned: ‘emergency conditions’Authors discuss the theoretical use of research advance directives in the context of federal regulations in the USA.
Cole et al292019USA1165CohortPsychiatric: agitationAuthors employ the use advance consent for enrolment in an randomised controlled trial.
Observational cohort study of patients screened and who consented in advance for potential future enrolment in a randomised trial examining treatments for acute agitation in the emergency department.
Corneli et al272018USA1095InterviewRespiratory: pneumoniaAuthors interview stakeholders to determine the perceived acceptability of the use advance consent for enrolment in a theoretical RCT.
Karlawish et al281997USA340Historical reviewNo specific condition mentioned: emergency medicineAuthors explain research advance directives and discuss the ethics and regulations in the USA concerning the use of advance consent for research on emergency conditions.
McGehrin et al252018USA811CommentaryNeurological: ischaemic strokeAuthors outline the use of a standardised document which allows patients to record their preferences regarding acute stroke treatment interventions, as well as for preferences for participation in future stroke clinical trials.