Table 4

Number (percentage) of participants reporting global improvement or achieving an improvement of 1.8 NRS units in the primary outcome (change in knee pain on walking; baseline minus 6 months), and relative risks* and risk differences*

Motion control shoes
(n=18)
Neutral shoes
(n=22)
Relative risk (95% CI)†P valueRisk difference (95% CI)‡P value
Improved pain§6/18 (33)10/22 (46)1.36 (0.61 to 3.01)0.450.12 (−0.18 to 0.42)0.44
Improved function§4/18 (22)7/22 (32)1.43 (0.50 to 4.10)0.500.10 (−0.18 to 0.37)0.49
Improvement >1.8 NRS units¶9/18 (50)14/22 (64)1.28 (0.74 to 2.24)0.380.14 (−0.16 to 0.44)0.36
  • *Relative risk and risk difference adjusted for radiographic severity (Kellgren and Lawrence grade).

  • †Relative risks <1 favour the motion control shoe group.

  • ‡Risk differences <0 favour the motion control shoe group.

  • §Rated using 7-point scales with the terminal descriptors ‘much worse’ to ‘much better’, with participants indicating ‘moderately better’ or ‘much better’ classified as improved.

  • ¶Improvement of >1.8 NRS units chosen as this is the minimum clinically important difference in the primary outcome, change in knee pain on walking (baseline–6 months).

  • NRS, Numeric Rating Scale.