Study characteristics
Author (year) Country | Clinical setting | Study design and n per arm | Intervention PROM | Method and frequency of PROM completion | Summary of actions based on PROM responses | Control arm |
Cummings et al
40
(2019) USA | Adults with symptoms of distress and/or depression attending general practice | 12-month RCT: Intervention n=67/usual care n=72 | PHQ-9* DDS-17† | In-person completion with trained study team member twice, 6 months apart | Stratified treatment to 16 sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy or lifestyle coaching based on PROM responses | Educational materials and usual care with GP. |
Dobler et al
44
(2018) Germany | Adults attending specialist outpatient clinic, recruitment during inpatient rehabilitation stay | 12-month RCT: Intervention n=98/Control n=101 | PAID†, WHO-5, PHQ-9* | Telephone completion with trained study team member, monthly | Behaviour motivation plan developed. Monthly follow-up telephone calls using PHQ-2 (with progression to PHQ-9 if PHQ score >3) to identify and address emotional problems. Severity of symptoms guided counselling techniques, increase in call frequency or referral | Written information on diet, physical activity by mail at 3 and 9 months. |
Fortmann et al
42
(2020) USA | Adults attending two primary care clinics | 12-month case control study: Intervention n=236/n=239 | PHQ-2*, PHQ-9* | In-person completion with the registered nurse or certified diabetes educator, once | Positive screening on PROM resulted in referral to depression care manager with group-based cognitive behavioural therapy. Depression screening was part of a collaborative care model focused on cardiometabolic targets | Standard diabetes care without depression screening. |
Ell et al
38
(2011) USA | Adults with PHQ9 response ≥10, attending primary care safety net clinics | 24-month RCT: Intervention n=193/Enhanced usual care n=194 | PHQ-9* | Telephone completion with trained study team member once | Collaborative care model using structured stepped-care algorithm, with patient preferences for problem-solving therapy or antidepressants guiding treatment | Standard care, depression educational pamphlets and social resource list. GPs informed of depression diagnosis. |
Johnson et al
41
(2014) USA | Adults with PHQ >10, attending general practice | 12-month case control: Intervention n=95/Active control n=62/usual care n=71 | PHQ-9* | Telephone completion with trained study team member at least monthly until PHQ-9 <10 | Case-managers delivered individualised care, in collaboration with psychiatrist and endocrinologist, with treatment recommendations to GP based on a treatment algorithm and PROM responses | GP notified by letter of elevated PHQ-9 responses. |
Naik et al
37
(2019) USA | Adults attending hospital and outpatient community Veterans Affairs clinics | 12-month RCT: Intervention n=136/Enhanced usual care (EUC) n=89 | PHQ-9* | Telephone completion with trained study team member once | Nine telephone coaching sessions with trained study members using workbooks guiding the discussion and tracking progress to set and assess goals related to wellness, diet, exercise medication management. | Participants informed of PHQ-9 responses with educational materials. |
Rees et al
43
(2017) Australia | Adults with diabetes related retinopathy and moderate diabetes distress attending specialist outpatient clinic | 6-month pilot RCT: Intervention n=21/control n=19 | DDS† | In-person completion with trained study member once | PROM responses guided eight 45–60 min problem solving therapy sessions | Pamphlets on diabetes-specific topics |
Sigurdardottir et al
45 (2009) Iceland | Adults attending specialist outpatient clinic | 6-month RCT: Intervention n=28/Control n=25 | PAID†
DKT, DES, Summary of diabetes self-care measure | In-person completion at clinic with diabetes educator once | Diabetes educators delivered individual educational sessions based on empowerment theory. PROM responses identified barriers to goals with a weekly follow-up call for 5 weeks | Information booklet about T2D and attended usual diabetes clinics. |
Wu et al
39
(2018) USA | Adults attending primary care or hospital-based safety net clinics | 6-month observational: Technology-facilitated care n=432/supported care n=461/usual care n=416 | PHQ-2, PHQ-9* | Initially completed via telephone with trained study member. Then monthly—quarterly completion via automated calls | PROM responses linked to clinical decision support that generated action reminders for healthcare professionals depending on PROM responses | Standard primary care. GPs offered optional training. |
*Depression.
†Diabetes distress.
DDS, Diabetes Distress Scale; DES, Diabetes Empowerment Scale; DKT, Diabetes Knowledge Test; GP, general practitioner; PAID, Problem Area In Diabetes scale; PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire (2 items or 9 items); PROM, patient-reported outcome measure; RCT, randomised controlled trial; T2D, type 2 diabetes; WHO-5, WHO five-item Well-Being Index.