Ordinal logistic models between HLC travel and RPM consumption, stratified by gender (n=412 299)
Travel variables | Males (n=195 131) | Females (n=217 168) | ||
Model 1† | Model 2‡ | Model 1† | Model 2‡ | |
OR (95% CI) | ||||
Any active travel (ref: none) | 0.87*** | 0.89*** | 0.85*** | 0.88*** |
(0.85 to 0.88) | (0.87 to 0.91) | (0.84 to 0.87) | (0.87 to 0.90) | |
Any walking (ref: none) | 0.91*** | 0.94*** | 0.88*** | 0.91*** |
(0.89 to 0.93) | (0.92 to 0.95) | (0.86 to 0.89) | (0.89 to 0.92) | |
Any cycling (ref: none) | 0.75*** | 0.76*** | 0.67*** | 0.72*** |
(0.73 to 0.77) | (0.74 to 0.78) | (0.65 to 0.69) | (0.69 to 0.74) | |
Non-work travel§ (ref: car only) | ||||
Car+public transport | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.12*** | 1.09*** |
(0.94 to 1.04) | (0.95 to 1.06) | (1.07 to 1.17) | (1.04 to 1.14) | |
Car+mixed (public and active) | 0.92*** | 0.96* | 0.93*** | 0.95*** |
(0.89 to 0.94) | (0.94 to 0.99) | (0.91 to 0.96) | (0.93 to 0.98) | |
Car+active travel | 0.95*** | 0.96*** | 0.94*** | 0.94*** |
(0.93 to 0.98) | (0.94 to 0.98) | (0.92 to 0.96) | (0.92 to 0.97) | |
Public transport only | 0.91*** | 0.89*** | 0.87*** | 0.88*** |
(0.87 to 0.95) | (0.85 to 0.94) | (0.84 to 0.90) | (0.84 to 0.91) | |
Public transport+active travel | 0.78*** | 0.77*** | 0.71*** | 0.76*** |
(0.75 to 0.81) | (0.74 to 0.81) | (0.69 to 0.74) | (0.73 to 0.79) | |
Walking only | 0.76*** | 0.75*** | 0.70*** | 0.71*** |
(0.73 to 0.78) | (0.72 to 0.78) | (0.68 to 0.72) | (0.69 to 0.74) | |
Cycling/cycling+walking | 0.56*** | 0.57*** | 0.50*** | 0.54*** |
(0.53 to 0.59) | (0.54 to 0.60) | (0.46 to 0.54) | (0.50 to 0.59) | |
Commuting travel¶ (ref: car only) | ||||
Car+public transport | 0.94** | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.04 |
(0.89 to 0.98) | (0.95 to 1.06) | (0.96 to 1.05) | (0.99 to 1.09) | |
Car+mixed (public and active) | 0.82*** | 0.89** | 0.83*** | 0.93* |
(0.76 to 0.87) | (0.84 to 0.96) | (0.78 to 0.89) | (0.86 to 0.99) | |
Car+active travel | 0.82*** | 0.83*** | 0.92*** | 0.89*** |
(0.78 to 0.86) | (0.79 to 0.87) | (0.88 to 0.96) | (0.85 to 0.93) | |
Public transport only | 0.86*** | 0.95 | 0.89*** | 0.97 |
(0.82 to 0.90) | (0.91 to 1.01) | (0.85 to 0.92) | (0.93 to 1.01) | |
Public transport+active travel | 0.70*** | 0.79*** | 0.71*** | 0.84*** |
(0.66 to 0.74) | (0.74 to 0.84) | (0.67 to 0.75) | (0.79 to 0.89) | |
Walking only | 0.76*** | 0.80*** | 0.89*** | 0.86*** |
(0.71 to 0.81) | (0.75 to 0.86) | (0.85 to 0.93) | (0.82 to 0.91) | |
Cycling/cycling+walking | 0.58*** | 0.60*** | 0.51*** | 0.55*** |
(0.54 to 0.62) | (0.56 to 0.64) | (0.46 to 0.55) | (0.50 to 0.60) |
*p<0.05; ** p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
†Model 1: unadjusted.
‡Model 2: adjusted for age, ethnic group, education, occupational class, household income, household size, number of cars, assessment centre location, population density, Townsend score (see full models in online supplementary appendix).
§n=194 774 males, n=216 827 females.
¶n=113 086 males, n=121 062 females.
HLC, healthy, low carbon; RPM, red and processed meat.