Child–parent concordance on the CHU9D adolescent version
Pearson’s correlation | Parent–child | Mother–child | Father–child | ||||||
N | CC | 95% CI | N | CC | 95% CI | N | CC | 95% CI | |
Adolescent algorithm for parents | 1786 | 0.13 | 0.09 to 0.18 | 1570 | 0.14 | 0.10 to 0.19 | 216 | 0.04 | −0.09 to 0.18 |
Sensitivity analysis | |||||||||
Adult algorithm for parents | 1786 | 0.15 | 0.10 to 0.19 | 1570 | 0.16 | 0.11 to 0.20 | 216 | 0.06 | −0.08 to 0.19 |
Adjusted linear regression | N | RC | P value | N | RC | P value | N | RC | P value |
Adolescent algorithm for parents | 1783 | 0.12 | <0.001 | 1569 | 0.13 | <0.001 | 214 | 0.04 | 0.53 |
Sensitivity analysis | |||||||||
Adult algorithm for parents | 1783 | 0.13 | <0.001 | 1569 | 0.14 | <0.001 | 214 | 0.05 | 0.42 |
Non-biological caregivers were excluded from these analyses (n=16). Covariates in adjusted linear regression models include parent and child age, SEIFA disadvantage index, BMI and parent and child sex in models including both sexes.
BMI, body mass index; CC, correlation coefficients for Pearson; CHU9D, Cchild Hhealth Utility 9 Dimension; n, number of biological child–parent pairs with this measure; RC, estimated regression coefficient; SEIFA, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas.