Table 3

Weighted percentage difference in cost of smoking for sociodemographics and cost-minimising strategies from GAM, stratified by social grade

Social gradeP value for interaction, high vs low
Low (n=7032)Middle (n=8138)High (n=1797)
100β with 95% CI100β with 95% CIP value for interaction, middle vs low100β with 95% CI
Age
 Per 10 years increase−0.23 (−1.04 to 0.59)−0.18 (−0.65 to 1.00)0.27 (−1.65 to 2.19)
Gender
 Malerefrefref
 Female0.54 (2.10 to 3.18)0.17 (−2.44 to 2.78)−1.55 (−7.56 to 4.46)
Factory-made cigarette consumption
 Per 10 cigarettes decrease−11.70 (−11.41 to −11.98)−13.20 (−12.93 to −13.47)<0.001−15.36 (−14.74 to −15.98)<0.001
RYO cigarette consumption
 Per 10 cigarettes decrease−4.95 (−4.68 to −5.21)−6.15 (−5.84 to −6.45)0.007−7.90 (−7.10 to −8.70)0.004
Use of illicit sources
 No use of illicit sources in last 6 monthsrefrefref
 Used illicit sources in last 6 months−12.25 (−16.72 to −7.78)−7.11 (−12.02 to −2.21)0.028−5.63 (−19.09 to 7.84)0.078
Cross-border purchase
 No cross-border purchase in last 6 monthsrefrefref
 Cross-border purchase in last 6 months−13.01 (−19.03 to −6.72)−9.99 (−14.46 to −5.53)0.264−7.24 (−15.80 to 1.33)0.053
  • All models were adjusted for all variables in the table.

  • GAM, generalised additive models; RYO, roll -your-own.