Table 2

Prevalence ratios and 95% CIs of frequency of laughing according to equivalised income

Equivalised income*
Q1Q2Q3Q4P for trend†
Men
 Number of participants2628245427392480
 Number of participants laughing almost every day81286610601096
 CrudeReference1.14 (1.06–1.24)1.25 (1.16–1.35)1.43 (1.33–1.54)<0.0001
 Age adjustedReference1.13 (1.05–1.22)1.25 (1.16–1.34)1.43 (1.33–1.54)<0.0001
 Multiadjusted model 1‡Reference1.04 (0.96–1.13)1.12 (1.04–1.21)1.24 (1.16–1.34)<0.0001
 Multiadjusted model 2§Reference1.03 (0.96–1.11)1.12 (1.05–1.21)1.21 (1.13–1.30)<0.0001
Women
 Number of of participants2688216928632731
 Number of participants laughing almost every day112687914621507
 CrudeReference0.97 (0.90–1.04)1.22 (1.15–1.29)1.32 (1.25–1.39)<0.0001
 Age adjustedReference0.96 (0.89–1.02)1.19 (1.13–1.26)1.30 (1.23–1.38)<0.0001
 Multiadjusted model 1Reference0.92 (0.86–0.99)1.09 (1.03–1.15)1.16 (1.10–1.23)<0.0001
 Multiadjusted model 2Reference0.98 (0.92–1.05)1.06 (1.00–1.12)1.14 (1.08–1.20)<0.0001
  • *Q1 (men; <€12 041, women; <€9518), Q2 (men; €12 041–€15 543, women; €9518–€14 957), Q3 (men; €15 544–€24 426, women; €14 958–€21 153), Q4 (men; ≥€24 427, women; ≥€21 154).

  • †P for trend was calculated by categorical variables.

  • ‡Model 1 is adjusted for age (5 years category), instrumental activities of daily living (independent, not independent, missing), depression (no depression, depression, missing).

  • §Model 2 is adjusted for the covariates in model 1 plus frequency of meeting friends (<2 times/week, ≥2 times/week, missing), number of social groups (0, 1 or 2, ≥3, missing), family structure (alone, ≥2 without partner, ≥2 with partner, missing).