Frequency of rationales, study designs, main findings and recommendations from non-randomised studies designed study to consider recruitment within proposed hypothetical RCTs (ie, Category D studies, commonly known as community consultations)
Recruitment study characteristic | Description | Frequency in Category D recruitment studies (n=11)* |
Rationale | Patients too unwell to provide IC | 9 |
Limited time for IC in host RCT due to the clinical condition requiring urgent treatment | 6 | |
To explore the accuracy of decisions made by NOK when acting as SDM | 1 | |
Recruitment study design | Questionnaire survey | 5 |
Face-to-face interview | 4 | |
Telephone survey | 1 | |
Focus group meetings | 1 | |
Recommendations for optimising recruitment in future RCTs or main findings† | To use a physician as a SDM | 4 |
To use NOK as a SDM | 4 | |
To use EFIC | 3 | |
Not to use NOK as a SDM | 2 | |
To provide RCT information verbally and allow a verbal consent process | 1 | |
To allow recruitment in prehospital setting | 1 | |
To perform community consultations to estimate host RCT recruitment rates† | 1 | |
Not to use a physician as a SDM | 1 | |
Not to use EFIC | 1 | |
To perform community consultations to aid selection of relevant study outcomes† | 1 |
*Each study may appear more than once in the relevant characteristics section (eg, if it described >1 rationale or produced >1 finding/recommendation).
†Items reported as main findings, but not recommendations for optimising recruitment.
EFIC, exception from informed consent; IC, informed consent; NOK, next of kin; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SDM, surrogate decision-maker.