Study quality characteristics using QUADAS tool
QUADAS tool item | Hux et al21 | Robinson et al22 | Borzecki et al13 | Wilchesky et al23 | Crane et al14 | So et al24 | Chen et al25 | Nedkoff et al28 | Quan et al26 | Young et al27 | Hebert et al15 | Ngo et al16 | Rector et al17 | Miller18 | Singh19 | O’Connor et al20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Was the spectrum of patients representative of the patients who will receive the test in practice? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were selection criteria clearly described? | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Is the time period between reference standard and index test short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did not change between the two tests? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Did the whole sample or a random selection of the sample, receive verification using a reference standard of diagnosis? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Did patients receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was the reference standard independent of the index test (ie, the index test did not form part of the reference standard)? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was the execution of the index test described in sufficient detail to permit replication of the test? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was the execution of the reference standard described in sufficient detail to permit its replication? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were the same clinical data available when test results were interpreted as would be available when the test is used in practice? | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear |
Were uninterpretable/intermediate test results reported? | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
Were withdrawals from the study explained? | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | No | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | No | Unclear | Unclear |
Score (maximum 14) | 11 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Bias assessment (maximum 5) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
QUADAS tool is extracted from table 2 of Whiting et al.12
QUADAS, Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.