Table 3

Five comparisons using multiple logistic regressions for the associations, outcome as susceptible to cigarette smoking—YSS 2012/2013—student grade 9–12

Susceptible to cigarette smoking*OR crudeOR adjusted
Outcomesn (%)(95% CI)(95%CI)
Comparison 1 (n=17 090)†
 Never tried cigarette smoking, but ever tried other types of tobacco775 (45.7)2.18 (1.84 to 2.59)1.96 (1.59 to 2.42)
 Never tried cigarette smoking, never tried any types of tobacco (ref)4220 (27.8)1.001.00
Comparison 2 (n=16 231)†
 Never tried cigarette smoking, but ever tried some flavoured tobacco376 (47.5)2.35 (1.84 to 3.00)2.20 (1.63 to 2.96)
 Never tried cigarette smoking, never tried any types of tobacco (ref)4220 (27.8)1.001.00
Comparison 3 (n=16 770)‡
 Never tried cigarette smoking, but some flavoured tobacco in past 30 days200 (51.4)2.61 (1.81 to 3.77)1.69 (1.08 to 2.64)
 Never tried cigarette smoking, no tobacco in past 30 days (ref)4644 (28.9)1.001.00
Comparison 4 (n=1682)§
 Never tried cigarette smoking, but ever tried some flavoured tobacco376 (47.5)1.16 (0.85 to 1.59)1.21 (0.88 to 1.67)
 Never cigarette, never flavoured tobacco, but ever other types of tobacco (ref)436 (43.8)1.001.00
Comparison (n=683)§
 Never tried cigarette smoking, but some flavoured tobacco in past 30 days200 (51.4)1.08 (0.63 to 1.85)0.93 (0.52 to 1.64)
 Never cigarette, no flavoured in past 30 days, but ATP in past 30 days (ref)153 (49.6)1.001.00
  • *Unweighted number and per cent of participants who were classified to be susceptible to cigarette smoking in each group.

  • †Variables considered as confounders in the final model: gender, grade, ethnicity, overall self-esteem score, family member smoking, number of closest friends smoking and risk of having an alcohol or drug-related disorder.

  • ‡Variables considered as confounders in the final model: gender, grade, family member smoking and risk of having an alcohol or drug-related disorder.

  • §Variables considered as confounders in the final model: gender, grade and family member smoking.