PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Bowie, Paul
AU  - Halley, Lyn
AU  - McKay, John
TI  - Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice
AID  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004245
DP  - 2014 Feb 01
TA  - BMJ Open
PG  - e004245
VI  - 4
IP  - 2
4099  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/2/e004245.short
4100  - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/2/e004245.full
SO  - BMJ Open2014 Feb 01; 4
AB  - Objective To explore experiences and perceptions of frontline administrators involved in the systems-based management of laboratory test ordering and results handling in general medical practice. Design Qualitative using focus group interviews. Setting West of Scotland general medical practices in three National Health Service (NHS) territorial board areas. Participants Convenience samples of administrators (receptionists, healthcare assistants and phlebotomists). Methods Transcript data were subjected to content analysis. Results A total of 40 administrative staff were recruited. Four key themes emerged: (1) system variations and weaknesses (eg, lack of a tracking process is a known risk that needs to be addressed). (2) Doctor to administrator communication (eg, unclear information can lead to emotional impacts and additional workload). (3) Informing patients of test results (eg, levels of anxiety and uncertainty are experienced by administrators influenced by experience and test result outcome) and (4) patient follow-up and confidentiality (eg, maintaining confidentiality in a busy reception area can be challenging). The key findings were explained in terms of sociotechnical systems theory. Conclusions The study further confirms the safety-related problems associated with results handling systems and adds to our knowledge of the communication and psychosocial issues that can affect the health and well-being of staff and patients alike. However, opportunities exist for practices to identify barriers to safe care, and plan and implement system improvements to accommodate or mitigate the potential for human error in this complex area.