Article Text
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to assess patients’ healthcare-seeking preferences in mild, chronic, and serious illness; identify influential factors; and examine the reasons underlying patients’ healthcare-seeking preference.
Design A retrospective study.
Setting The study was conducted in 14 tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China.
Participants Questionnaires were distributed to 1519 patients, and 1114 were completed and returned. All patients participated in the study voluntarily, provided written informed consent, and possessed the ability to complete the questionnaire.
Main outcome measures We measured and compared preferences and choice of healthcare providers in patients if they had experienced mild, chronic, or serious illness.
Results More than 50% of participants, including those who were >60 years of age, had consulted a doctor more than three times during the preceding year, were single, and were most likely to decide not to seek medical treatment. Community health facilities were the most frequently selected healthcare provider in mild illness. In addition, patients who had no personal preference, did not express a preference for a good environment or first-class medical technology, were concerned about close proximity and short waiting times, and pursued low medical costs were most likely to choose a community health facility. General hospitals were the most frequently selected healthcare provider in chronic and serious illness. In addition, patients who earned higher monthly incomes, did not pursue low medical costs, were not concerned about short waiting times or close proximity, and expressed a preference for first-class medical technology, were most likely to choose general hospitals.
Conclusion Patients’ healthcare-seeking preference was influenced mainly by healthcare providers’ characteristics, illness severity, and sociodemographic characteristics. These findings indicate that patients’ current healthcare-seeking preference was not ideal and requires optimisation.
- preference
- choice
- healthcare
- patient
- influential factor
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Three authors, WY, ML, and FY, contributed equally to this research. WY, ML, FY, CX, and LZ prepared the manuscript. WY made substantial contributions to the study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, and revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. ML and FY made substantial contributions to the study conception and design, interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. CX contributed to the data collection and manuscript revision. LZ made substantial contributions to the study conception and design. All of the authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed with submission for publication.
Funding The project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71233008, 71303248, 71673291), Important Disease Joint Research Project in Health Systems of Shanghai (2013ZYJB0006), and Military Health Support Strategy and Key Technology Research for Special Injuries in the South China Sea Region (AWS12J002).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Ethics Committee of Second Military Medical University.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.