Article Text
Abstract
Objective To examine the mental ill health burden associated with allergic and atopic disorders, in a UK primary care cohort.
Design Population-based retrospective open cohort study.
Setting United Kingdom.
Participants 2 491 086 individuals with primary-care recorded atopic disorder (food allergy, drug allergy, anaphylaxis, urticaria, allergic rhino-conjunctivitis) diagnosis were matched by sex, age (± 2 years), and socio-economic deprivation (Townsend quintile score) at index to 3 120 719 unexposed individuals. The mean age of exposed patients at cohort entry was 39.42 years (SD (SD) 23.65) compared with 35.81 years (SD 22.17) for unexposed patients.
Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite of mental ill health (severe mental illness, anxiety, depression, eating disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and self-harm), identified using Read codes. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the composite mental ill health outcome and each of the individual mental health disorders. Covariates adjusted for were age, sex, alcohol use, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), Townsend deprivation quintile score, asthma exposure, and eczema exposure at baseline.
Results Between first January 1995 to 31st January 2022, a total of 2 491 086 eligible individuals were identified with a primary care recorded diagnosis of atopic disease and were matched to 3 120 719 unexposed individuals. 229 124 exposed individuals developed a mental ill health outcome during the study period (incidence ratio (IR) 144.13 per 10 000 person-years) compared with 203 450 in the unexposed group (IR 117.82 per 10 000 person-years). This translated to an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.16 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.17). Notably, the risk of anxiety was greatest, aHR 1.22 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.23). Our findings were robust to a sensitivity analysis, where individuals were also matched for asthma and eczema.
Conclusion There is an increased risk of mental ill health disorders among patients with diagnosis of an allergic and atopic disorders. There is a need to consider dual delivery of allergy and psychology services to optimise mental well-being among this cohort.
- MENTAL HEALTH
- Allergy
- EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES
- PUBLIC HEALTH
- Primary Care
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The data and analysis code can be obtained from the corresponding author following appropriate ethical approval.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
Large study sample of approximately 2.5 million patients which is representative of the UK general population with respect to demographics and comorbid conditions.
Data (diagnoses for exposure and outcomes of interest) are derived from electronic primary care records reducing recall bias, as diagnoses are recorded at the time of consultation.
Risk of heterogeneity in recording which can create misclassification bias, although this affects both the exposures and outcomes of interest.
Due to poor recording in the primary care database, we are unable to perform stratification by disease severity status and account for confounders such as educational level and parental psychiatric history.
Introduction
Atopic and allergic disorders (food allergy, drug allergy, anaphylaxis, urticaria, and allergic rhino-conjunctivitis) are common chronic conditions globally and in the UK population,1 with significant associated morbidity.2 These disorders are caused by an aberrant immune system response, mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibiodies to otherwise innocuous antigens (allergens). The effects can range from mild and local responses (eg, mild allergic rhinitis) to life-threatening (eg, anaphylaxis).
Mental health disorders are also highly prevalent in the UK, with a 2014 survey showing that 1 in 6 people aged 16 years and older in England met the criteria for a common mental disorder (CMD).3 CMDs comprise of mental health disorders that interfere with daily functioning, but not insight or cognition. This includes different types of depression and anxiety, mixed depression-anxiety, phobias, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and panic disorder.4 Mental health disorders are an important cause of disability and are a risk factor for premature mortality.5 6 Severe mental illness (SMI), by contrast, is a subset of mental health disorders characterised by a greater degree of functional and occupational impairment, limiting major life activities and typically includes psychoses and bipolar disorder.7 Data from England in 2018 to 2020 shows that people with SMI are five times more likely to die prematurely (before age 75 years) than those without an SMI.8
Increasingly, research suggests a relationship between atopic disease and mental health conditions.9 Epidemiological research has shown associations between allergic rhinitis and mood disorders,10 11 suicidal ideation,12 and anxiety disorders.13 Although less well studied, some research has shown that urticaria is also associated with reduced quality of life and greater symptoms of depression and anxiety.14 15 Food allergy has been associated with reduced quality of life, anxiety and depression,16 17 as has anaphylaxis.18 The majority of this research has been in non-UK cohorts and is limited by small sample sizes and cross-sectional design. Given the high prevalence of both atopic and mental health disorders, understanding any association between the two is vital for improving patient care and for targeting interventions to reduce the burden associated with both. Using UK primary care data, we investigated the associations between atopic disorders and the subsequent risk of developing mental ill health disorders. As there is already a strong evidence base for asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis,9–11 we focused our analysis on food allergy, drug allergy, anaphylaxis, urticaria, allergic rhino-conjunctivitis.
Methods
Study design, data source, and population
A UK population-based, retrospective, open cohort study was undertaken using data from the IQVIA Medical Research Database (IMRD) from first January 1995 to 28th February 2021. The IMRD UK database contains de-identified electronic medical records from UK primary care general practices using the Vision software system. It is nationally representative of the UK population, with respect to demographic structure and the prevalence of common comorbidities.19 20 Patient data regarding symptoms, examination findings, and diagnoses is recorded using Read codes21 - a hierarchical clinical coding system used in UK primary care.
The ‘Data extraction for epidemiological research (DExtER)’ tool22 was used to facilitate data extraction, transformation and loading in this study. The data analysis and reporting adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement (online supplemental appendix A).23
Supplemental material
To ensure accurate coding and reduce underreporting of outcomes, general practices were only eligible for inclusion from the later of the following two dates: 1 year after the installation of the Vision software system or the date acceptable mortality recording (AMR) was achieved.24 AMR date is determined by the comparison between recording of death by practices and the predicted mortality, using national data, accounting for the demographic of a practices’ catchment area. The AMR date is defined as the point where the national and practice mortality rates align.
Exposure and outcome definition
The aim of this study was to compare the risk of mental ill health (composite measure: defined through Read codes describing depression, anxiety, severe mental illness [psychosis, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia], eating disorders, OCD, and self-harm) in exposed patients (Read codes for food allergy, drug allergy, anaphylaxis, urticaria, allergic rhino-conjunctivitis) with unexposed patients (those without such codes). For this analysis, self-harm includes any deliberate act of inflicting harm on oneself, regardless of suicidal intent. Codes for allergic and atopic disorders and mental ill health were selected with the help of general health practitioners, public health clinicians and immunologists to define the exposed cohort (see Appendix B for the codes used in this study). The primary outcome of interest was a composite of mental ill health but each of the aforementioned mental health disorders was also analysed separately. Patients with mental health disorders at baseline were excluded from the study.
Individuals with atopic disorders were matched to up to four unexposed individuals randomly selected from the remaining pool of eligible patients, by general practice, age (± 2 years), sex and Townsend deprivation quintile score25 at baseline. The Townsend deprivation quintile score is a measure of socioeconomic status derived from national census data, including variables such as home ownership and employment.26 A higher score correlates to greater socio-economic deprivation.
Follow-up period
Index date for patients in the exposed group was defined as the date of first Read code relating to atopic disorder diagnosis (incident cases) or the date of eligibility of cohort entry for those with pre-existing recoded Read code (prevalent cases). To prevent immortal time bias,24 matched unexposed patients were assigned the same index date. An open cohort design allows patients to be enrolled at different timepoints, and for each patient to contribute person-years of follow-up from the point of entry (index date) to the point of exit (exit date). Exit date was defined as the earliest of (1) the outcome, (2) death, (3) patient left the general practice, (4) last date of data collection from the practice, or (5) study end date.
Study covariates
Co-variates adjusted for in the analysis were: age, sex, alcohol use, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), Townsend deprivation quintile score, asthma exposure, and eczema exposure at baseline. These co-variates were selected due to their potential independent relationship with the development of mental ill health.27 28 Our matching criteria included age, sex, and Townsend deprivation quintile score, however we also included these as covariates in the study models to account for any residual confounding.
BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared and categorised as per the WHO criteria (underweight<18·5 kg/m2, normal 18·5–24·9kg/m2, overweight 25·0–29·9kg/m2, obese>30·0kg/m2). Smoking status (current smoker, non-current smoker, not available) and alcohol use (current drinker, non-current drinker, not available) were self-reported.
Statistical analysis
STATA version 1829 was used for all analyses. Missing data was included as a separate missing category and was included in the regression analysis, in keeping with previously published work.30–32
Crude incidence rates (IR) were calculated for the exposed and unexposed groups by dividing the number of outcomes by person-years. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to derive unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs describing the association between atopic disorders and the risk of mental ill health (composite outcome) and then for each mental health disorder included in the study individually. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. A sensitivity analysis was undertaken by matching participants for asthma and eczema exposure.
Patient and public involvement
Patients and/or the public were not involved in setting the research or interpretation and write up of results. This was deemed unnecessary as all patient related data used was anonymised.
Results
In this study, 2 491 086 individuals were identified with a primary care recorded diagnosis of atopic disease and they were matched to 3 120 719 unexposed individuals. All data describing baseline characteristics are outlined in table 1. The exposed cohort had a median follow-up period of 5.10 person years (IQR 2.02–9.68) vs 4.11 (1.59–8.37) in the unexposed cohort. Due to matching, the mean age at cohort entry and sex distribution were similar, although exposed individuals were more likely to be female than unexposed individuals (54.64 vs 49.98%). Data on BMI, smoking status, drinking status, Townsend index, and ethnicity were missing in both groups. Where recorded, data on smoking status, drinking status, and Townsend index were similar between the groups. However, individuals in the exposed group were more likely to be obese (13.99% vs 9.94%) and of white ethnicity (42.19% vs 35.72%) compared with those in the unexposed group.
Baseline characteristics
During the study period, there were 229 124 recorded outcomes of mental ill health in the exposed group (IR 144.13 per 10 000 person-years) compared with 203 450 in the unexposed group (IR 117.82 per 10 000 person-years); (table 2). This translated to an aHR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.17). The risk of anxiety (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.23), depression (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.16), eating disorders (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11), OCD (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.26), and self-harm (aHR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04) were greater in the exposed group compared with the unexposed group. By contrast, there was no difference in the risk of SMI between the two groups, aHR 0.99 (9% CI 0.95 to 1.03).
Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mental ill health among patients with any atopic or allergic disorder compared with matched unexposed individuals
Table 3A–E describe the risk of mental ill health outcomes associated with each type of atopic disorder included in the exposure for this study (food allergy, drug allergy, anaphylaxis, urticaria, and allergic rhinitis respectively). All individual atopic disorders were associated with greater risk of mental ill health compared with non-exposed individuals: food allergy (aHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11); drug allergy (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.29); anaphylaxis (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.54); urticaria (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.17); allergic rhinitis (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.14) (table 3A–E).
Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mental ill health among patients with specific atopic and allergic disorders
Notably, our results demonstrated that food allergy and drug allergy exposure were associated with increased risk of all mental health outcomes. Individuals with anaphylaxis exposure had the greatest risk of anxiety (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.79), OCD (aHR 2.37, 95% CI 1.28 to 4.40), and depression (aHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.50); (table 3c).
We carried out a sensitivity analysis, matching both groups for asthma and eczema in addition to other baseline characteristics (online supplemental table S1). The findings of the sensitivity analysis were similar to that of the main cohort. There was an increased risk of all mental ill health outcomes in those with atopic disease exposure compared with those without, aHR 1.16 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.16). The risk of all individual mental health outcomes except SMI was increased, reflecting the main cohort analysis: SMI (aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.03); anxiety (aHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.23); depression (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.16); eating disorders (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10); OCD (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.24); self-harm (aHR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05).
Supplemental material
Online supplemental tables S3–S7 describe the risk of mental ill health outcomes associated with each type of atopic disorder, in the sensitivity analysis, with patients also matched for asthma and eczema.
Discussion
Principal findings
In this population-based UK retrospective cohort study, we found that individuals with primary care recorded exposure to atopic disease had a 16% higher risk of having a subsequent mental health diagnosis, compared with those with no such exposure. Analysis of each individual mental health outcome showed a positive association with atopy exposure, except SMI. These findings were robust to a sensitivity analysis, suggesting that the impact was related to atopy rather than eczema or asthma.
Consideration of individual atopic and allergic disorders showed that individuals with anaphylaxis exposure had the greatest risk of subsequent mental health diagnosis, with 43% increased risk compared with those without. They were most likely to be diagnosed with OCD, anxiety, or depression (137%, 59% and 36% increased risk respectively). Notably, only drug allergy and food allergy exposure conferred an increased risk of SMI.
Comparison with previous studies
The evidence base for atopic disorders (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) and their relationship with mental health disorders is still emerging, especially for diagnoses other than depression and anxiety. Our study expands on the existing global literature. It supports the findings of previous studies demonstrating a relationship between atopic disorders and common mental health disorders (depression and anxiety). Although the strength of associations previously found varies across the conditions being assessed and the majority of previous studies explored mental health outcomes in those with allergic rhinitis, asthma, and/or eczema. Some evidence has also linked allergy, eating disorders,33 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and suicides.34 Our study has examined these associations in a large sample, representative of the general UK population where previous studies have often included small sample sizes of clinical population, which may differ in their demographics from the general population.
Previous research has indicated a strong association between food allergy and anxiety, which could be driven by the fear of a life-threatening reaction.17 Our study’s findings provide support to this association. Individuals with food allergy in our study demonstrated a 15% increase in anxiety (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.22); (table 3a).
Previous research indicates the relationship between atopic disorders and mental health disorders appears to be bidirectional. Some studies have shown that individuals with depression are more likely to have a concomitant diagnosis of allergies, including non-food allergies.35–38 A twin study from Finland suggested the possibility of a genetic link between allergy and depression.39 Birth cohort studies from northern Finland have demonstrated strong association between depression and allergy, especially in females.40 41 One study demonstrated that females with atopy had an 80% increased risk of developing depression (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.6).41
Potential underlying mechanisms
It has been suggested that patients with allergies and mental health disorders have similar disruptions in immune pathways.42 Depression and anxiety can enhance the inflammatory Th2 and Th17 pathways34 which are also implicated in the aetiology of allergy.43 Indeed, there is clinical evidence to suggest that this relationship could be bi-directional - that is, having a diagnosis of either allergy or a mental health disorder can increase the risk of the other (Zhang et al., 2022). In further support of this hypothesis, medication for depression has been shown to improve allergy symptoms42 and vice-versa.44 Poor allergy management can worsen outcomes too: a Canadian study found increased tics, anxiety and disruptive behaviour patterns in children aged 5–10 years receiving hydroxyzine, a first-generation antihistamine.45
The data on the relationship between severity of allergy and mental health disease are less clear. One study suggested that the likelihood of mental health disease increases with increased severity of atopic dermatitis,46 but there are no data on the risks related to other allergic conditions. One hypothesis is that immunological and inflammatory responses associated with atopy may predispose to increased risk of mental health disorders, particularly depression.47 In sensitised individuals, exposure to an allergen results in IgE-mediated activation of mast cells, causing mass secretion of chemicals such as histamine and cytokines (eg, interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13). Recent evidence suggests that these cytokines can alter neurotransmitter systems, contributing to the development of psychiatric disorders.48 Pro-inflammatory cytokine exposure has been shown to induce symptoms of anhedonia, lethargy, sleep disturbance, and anorexia- all of which are established symptoms of depression.49 50 Many pathophysiologic pathways in the nervous system are posited to be involved in depression, including the monoaminergic pathway, dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA), and glutamate transmission.48 51
A second hypothesis that can explain the observed relationship is that the chronicity of atopic and allergic disorders results in increased psychosocial stress. A review by Golding et al16 reported that food allergies are associated with reduced reported health-related quality of life (HRQL), and greater symptoms of depression and anxiety, related to the vigilance required to avoid exposure to triggers and associated social consequences. Furthermore, the management for atopic and allergic disorders focuses on controlling symptoms and preventing flare ups; there are no curative treatments. Repeated relapses, unsuccessful lines of treatment, and the subsequent impact on functional status represent another source of stress for individuals,52 which can predispose to adverse mental health. This is particularly relevant to children; many of these disorders develop in early childhood and early childhood experiences can be fundamental to the development of mental ill health and through epigenetic modifications can predispose abnormal stress responses in adults,53 which is a risk factor for mental health disorders. Several studies demonstrate chronic physical illness and association with mental health disorders like depression, anxiety, and ADHD.54 55
It is possible (indeed likely) that both of these factors contribute to the relationship between atopic disorders and mental ill health.
Implications for clinical practice
A growing body of evidence demonstrates the impact of allergic disorders on long-term mental health outcomes, but few clinical guidelines or allergy services address this. There is a global unmet need for psychological support for patients in allergy clinics.56 57 A recent global survey of psychological support needs found that for adults and parents in the UK, over 80% reported psychological distress related to their or their child’s food allergy but less than 25% had been assessed for food allergy related distress and only 40% of those who needed it had been seen by a mental health professional.56 This pattern was similar across many other countries in Europe and North and South America. This study reinforces the growing evidence base for the integration of psychological services into standard allergy care.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths of this study include its large and diverse sample, which is generalisable to the UK population with respect to demographics and prevalence of chronic conditions.19 20 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large-scale UK primary-care based cohort study examining the relationship between atopic disorders and mental health disorders. The use of electronic health records from a primary care database reduces recall bias as data is recorded during patient consultations. The study is novel for inclusion of a range of atopic and mental health disorders- many of which are poorly studied in the existing literature.
This study has a few key limitations which must be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the study uses data from electronic healthcare records which relies on accurate documentation by healthcare professionals in general practices contributing to the dataset. Heterogeneity in recording, which can affect both the exposure and outcomes of interest, can result in misclassification bias. However, the coding of mental health disorders is more likely to be complete as SMI feature in the in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF; which is a UK primary care performance management reward scheme).58 Additionally, while we recognised post-traumatic stress disorder as an important outcome, we could not include it in this analysis due to underdiagnosis in UK primary care settings and subsequent inconsistent coding in the database.59 Another limitation related to coding is that we are unable to stratify included patients by disease severity which could provide useful findings by sensitivity analysis. Similarly, factors such as educational status, parental psychiatric history which could be confounders cannot be included due to poor recording.
Recommendations for future research
Further longitudinal studies of large community-representative samples are required to further explore the association between the broad range of atopic disorders and mental health disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder. Future studies could explore with sub-group analyses differences in outcomes by age-of-onset and disease severity. Effect of psychological interventions, particularly on the most affected subgroups (eg, those with history of anaphylaxis), should also be measured systematically.
Conclusion
Individuals with allergies and atopic disease were at an increased risk of developing mental ill health in this UK primary care cohort. A positive association was found between allergy and all mental health disorders (anxiety, depression, eating disorders, OCD, and self-harm) except SMI. Given the high prevalence of allergic and atopic disorders, this association underscores a substantial public mental health burden. Primary and secondary healthcare services should be aware of the potential risk of mental health disorders in patients presenting with allergic and atopic disorders. Appropriate referrals for suitable psychological support should be made where possible.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. The data and analysis code can be obtained from the corresponding author following appropriate ethical approval.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
Anonymised data was used from the data provider to the University of Birmingham. The use of IQVIA Medical Research Data is approved by the United Kingdom Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 18/LO/0441); in accordance with this approval, the study protocol must be reviewed and approved by an independent Scientific Review Committee (SRC). The protocol has been approved for this project by the independent SRC (22SRC027). IQVIA Medical Research Data incorporates data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a Cegedim Database. Reference made to THIN is intended to be descriptive of the data asset licensed by IQVIA. This work has used de-identified data provided by patients as a part of their routine primary care. As the data is de-identified there is no opportunity/ability for the research team to seek independent written consent from those who contribute to the dataset.
References
Footnotes
LD and NA are joint senior authors.
Contributors Conceptualization (LD, RK, JSC, NA), data curation (JSC, NA), data analysis (SM, NA, JSC), methodology (NA, JSC), writing - original draft (SM), writing - review and editing (all authors: SM, RK, JSC, NA, LD). All authors approved the final version. LD is the guarantor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.